Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gravitational vacuum polarization: Decoupling and the conformal anomaly

Emil Mottola*

  • *Contact author: mottola.emil@gmail.com, emottola@unm.edu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 105010 – Published 9 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zfr1-2dwf

Abstract

A compact form of the stress-tensor ⟨TabTcd⟩ correlation function of a quantum scalar field of arbitrary mass m and curvature coupling ξ is presented, with particular emphasis on decoupling in the m→∞ limit and the IR origin of the conformal anomaly as m→0. The Ward identity (WI) of covariant conservation is verified for the full second-order metric variation of the one-loop effective action, of which ⟨TabTcd⟩ is part, including local contact terms. This WI is satisfied by two tensors, one spin-2 (traceless) and the second spin-0 (traceful), each multiplied by a Lorentz-invariant form factor computed in n-dimensional regularization. Minimal subtraction of pole terms at n=4 produces form factors that fail to satisfy decoupling for general ξ≠1/6, but can be simply amended to do so. Particular attention is given to the ξ=1/6 case, in which the spin-0 form factor at n=4 is completely finite, requires no UV regularization or subtractions, and satisfies decoupling directly. Its imaginary part defines a spectral function that obeys a UV-finite sum rule for any m, while its real part unambiguously determines the □R term in the conformal anomaly in the massless limit. Its m2 dependence describes a Wilsonian renormalization group flow to an effective field theory limit at large distances. At m=0, the spin-0 spectral function becomes a Dirac δ function at zero energy, demonstrating the existence of a massless scalar Goldstone collective excitation due to the conformal anomaly in the low-energy effective theory of gravity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  2. H. Georgi, Effective field theory, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 209 (1993).
  3. A. V. Manohar, Introduction to effective field theories, in Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology, Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School 2017 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2020), pp. 47–136.
  4. A. A. Petrov and A. E. Blechman, Effective Field Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 2016).
  5. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared singularities and massive fields, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2856 (1975).
  6. B. S. DeWitt, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Phys. Rep. 19, 295 (1975).
  7. I. L. Shapiro, Effective action of vacuum: The semiclassical approach, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 103001 (2008).
  8. I. L. Buchbinder and I. L. Shapiro, Introduction to Quantum Field Theory with Applications to Quantum Gravity (Oxford University Press, New York, 2021).
  9. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  10. S. Weinberg, The cosmological constant problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989).
  11. J. Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask), C. R. Phys. 13, 566 (2012).
  12. T. M. C. Abbott et al., First cosmology results using type ia supernovae from the dark energy survey: Constraints on cosmological parameters, Astrophys. J. 872, L30 (2019).
  13. D. M. Capper and M. J. Duff, Trace anomalies in dimensional regularization, Nuovo Cimento A 23, 173 (1974).
  14. L. S. Brown, Stress-tensor trace anomaly in a gravitational metric: Scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1469 (1977).
  15. L. S. Brown and J. P. Cassidy, Stress-tensor trace anomaly in a gravitational metric: General theory, Maxwell field, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2810 (1977).
  16. M. J. Duff, Observations on conformal anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B125, 334 (1977).
  17. S. L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).
  18. R. A. Bertlmann, Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).
  19. S. Treiman, R. Jackiw, and D. J. Gross, Lectures on Current Algebra and Its Applications (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2015).
  20. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities, Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971).
  21. G. ’t Hooft, How instantons solve the U(1) problem, Phys. Rep. 142, 357 (1986).
  22. G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, in Recent Developments in Gauge Theories, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series Vol. 59 (1980), pp. 135–157, 10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5_9.
  23. M. Giannotti and E. Mottola, Trace anomaly and massless scalar degrees of freedom in gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79, 045014 (2009).
  24. A. Dolgov and V. Zakharov, On conservation of the axial current in massless electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B27, 525 (1971).
  25. J. Hořejší, Dispersive derivation of the triangle anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 32, 1029 (1985).
  26. E. Mottola, A. V. Sadofyev, and A. Stergiou, Axions and superfluidity in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134512 (2024).
  27. R. Armillis, C. Corianò, and L. Delle Rose, Anomaly poles as common signatures of chiral and conformal anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 682, 322 (2009).
  28. P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Weyl cohomology and the effective action for conformal anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 64, 104022 (2001).
  29. E. Mottola and R. Vaulin, Macroscopic effects of the quantum trace anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064004 (2006).
  30. E. Mottola, The effective theory of gravity and dynamical vacuum energy, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 037.
  31. C. Corianò, L. D. Rose, E. Mottola, and M. Serino, Solving the conformal constraints for scalar operators in momentum space and the evaluation of feynman’s master integrals, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 111.
  32. A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 153.
  33. A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 111.
  34. C. Corianò, M. M. Maglio, and E. Mottola, TTT in CFT: Trace identities and the conformal anomaly effective action, Nucl. Phys. B942, 303 (2019).
  35. P. R. Anderson, C. Molina-París, and E. Mottola, Linear response, validity of semiclassical gravity, and the stability of flat space, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024026 (2003).
  36. E. V. Gorbar and I. L. Shapiro, Renormalization group and decoupling in curved space, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2003) 004.
  37. I. L. Shapiro and J. Solà, On the possible running of the cosmological “constant”, Phys. Lett. B 682, 105 (2009).
  38. P. Mazur and E. Mottola, Spontaneous breaking of de sitter symmetry by radiative effects, Nucl. Phys. B278, 694 (1986).
  39. I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov, and I. L. Shapiro, Effective Action in Quantum Gravity (Routledge, 2017), 10.1201/9780203758922.
  40. R. Bertlmann and E. Kohlprath, Two-dimensional gravitational anomalies, Schwinger terms, and dispersion relations, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 288, 137 (2001).
  41. J. S. Dowker and R. Critchley, Stress-tensor conformal anomaly for scalar, spinor, and vector fields, Phys. Rev. D 16, 3390 (1977).
  42. S. Deser, M. Duff, and C. Isham, Non-local conformal anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B111, 45 (1976).
  43. M. Asorey, E. V. Gorbar, and I. L. Shapiro, Universality and ambiguities of the conformal anomaly, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 163 (2003).
  44. P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling, and W. G. Unruh, Energy-momentum tensor near an evaporating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2720 (1976).
  45. S. M. Christensen and S. A. Fulling, Trace anomalies and the Hawking effect, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2088 (1977).
  46. A. M. Polyakov, Quantum geometry of bosonic strings, Phys. Lett. 103B, 207 (1981).
  47. A. M. Polyakov, Quantum gravity in two dimensions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 02, 893 (1987).
  48. D. N. Blaschke, R. Carballo-Rubio, and E. Mottola, Fermion pairing and the scalar boson of the 2D conformal anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 153.
  49. E. V. Gorbar and I. L. Shapiro, Renormalization group and decoupling in curved space, II. The standard model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2003) 004.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation