Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scale-invariant open quantum systems

Carlos Argüelles1, Gabriela Barenboim2, Gonzalo Herrera1,3, Tanvi Krishnan1, and Héctor Sanchis2

  • 1Harvard University, Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 2Departament de Física Teórica and IFIC, Universitat de València-CSIC, E-46100, Burjassot, Spain
  • 3Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Phys. Rev. D 114, 056008 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/z1tw-kzbb

Abstract

We develop the complete theoretical framework for open quantum systems coupled to scale-invariant environments. Such environments, we show, are universally and uniquely described by unparticle baths [1] characterized by a single scaling dimension dU, which is a property of the bath operator entering the coupling, not of the probe. Different probes coupled to the same bath operator OE must yield the same dU, providing a nontrivial cross-probe consistency test for a fixed coupling channel. This companion paper provides the full proof of the uniqueness theorem, the mathematical formalism of the resulting non-Markovian dynamics, and worked applications to three physical realizations omitted from the shorter letter [2]. Starting from the uniqueness theorem, we derive the complete set of non-Markovian memory kernels, the exact noise kernel, including vacuum and thermal contributions via Matsubara summation, and the fractional generalization of the Caldeira-Leggett master equation for arbitrary dU. The unparticle dimension acts as a control parameter governing a rich phase structure, including a thermalization transition at dU=3/2, the Ohmic boundary at dU=2, and a decoherence phase transition at dU=5/2 in the thermal regime (dU=2 in the vacuum regime), beyond which quantum coherence is protected at long times. These transitions are universal for free-field, weakly interacting, and engineered power-law baths; for strongly interacting CFT baths they describe intermediate-time scaling in the window 1/ωUVt1/T. Three physical realizations are presented. For the quantum Ising model, dU is derived from first principles from the known CFT operator dimension. For inflationary cosmology, dU=2 is obtained by matching to established results; for heavy-fermion materials, dU=3/2 is inferred empirically from two-channel transport data. Coupling to the energy operator in (1+1) spacetime dimensions yields dU=3/2, providing a field-theoretic derivation of 1/f noise; the (2+1)D case yields dU1.413 from the conformal bootstrap [3]. For high-energy astrophysical neutrinos in the regime ET, the energy- and baseline-dependent decoherence rate ΓdecohB(E,TU)L52dU provides a direct observable imprint of the scaling dimension. A systematic comparison with the Caldeira-Leggett model, phenomenological Lindblad equations, and the non-Markovian literature establishes the precise relationship between these approaches and the unparticle framework. The regime of validity is analyzed for each physical system, including the crossover between vacuum and thermal regimes of the noise kernel. Experimental predictions and consistency tests are detailed for trapped-ion quantum simulators, neutrino telescopes, and superconducting qubits.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. H. Georgi, Unparticle physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 221601 (2007).
  2. C. Argüelles, G. Barenboim, G. Herrera, T. Krishnan, and H. Sanchis, Universal description of decoherence in scale-invariant environments, arXiv:2604.15445.
  3. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision islands in the Ising and O(N) models, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 036.
  4. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988).
  5. Y. Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, Phys. Rep. 569, 1 (2015).
  6. M. A. Luty, J. Polchinski, and R. Rattazzi, The a-theorem and the asymptotics of 4d quantum field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 152.
  7. G. Källén, On the definition of the renormalization constants in quantum electrodynamics, Helv. Phys. Acta 25, 417 (1952).
  8. H. Lehmann, On the properties of propagation functions and renormalization constants of quantized fields, Il Nuovo Cimento 11, 342 (1954).
  9. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
  10. I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017).
  11. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  12. A. Smirne and B. Vacchini, Nakajima-Zwanzig versus time-convolutionless master equation for the non-Markovian dynamics of a two-level system, Phys. Rev. A 82, 022110 (2010).
  13. N. Anto-Sztrikacs and D. Segal, Capturing non-Markovian dynamics with the reaction coordinate method, Phys. Rev. A 104, 052617 (2021).
  14. F. Giraldi and F. Petruccione, Survival of coherence for open quantum systems in thermal baths, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042102 (2013).
  15. O. Kálmán et al., Decoherence of a qubit coupled to a quantum-critical environment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021302 (2013).
  16. N. Bao, A. Chatwin-Davies, J. Pollack, and G. N. Remmen, Gravitational decoherence, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 065.
  17. M. Rai, L. Chen, and D. Boyanovsky, Infrared dressing in real time: Emergence of anomalous dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 104, 085021 (2021).
  18. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).
  19. A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, KITP Talks (2015), http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/.
  20. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  21. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 106.
  22. O. Trovarelli, C. Geibel, S. Mederle, C. Langhammer, F. M. Grosche, P. Gegenwart, M. Lang, G. Sparn, and F. Steglich, YbRh2Si2: Pronounced non-Fermi-liquid effects above a low-lying magnetic phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 626 (2000).
  23. H. v. Löhneysen, T. Pietrus, G. Portisch, H. G. Schlager, A. Schröder, M. Sieck, and T. Trappmann, Non-Fermi-liquid behavior in a heavy-fermion alloy at a magnetic instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3262 (1994).
  24. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory (Springer, New York, 1997).
  25. C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, J. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021).
  26. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  27. T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: Renormalization by point splitting, Proc. R. Soc. A 360, 117 (1978).
  28. C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, Quantum to classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 07, 455 (1998).
  29. T. Colas, J. Grain, G. Kaplanek, and V. Vennin, In-in formalism for the entropy of quantum fields in curved spacetimes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 047.
  30. D. J. Fixsen, The temperature of the cosmic microwave background, Astrophys. J. 707, 916 (2009).
  31. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The early universe, Frontiers in Physics Vol. 69 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990).
  32. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  33. B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, T.-H. Yeh, and C. Young, Big-bang nucleosynthesis after Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 010; 11 (2020) E02.
  34. E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Altshuler, 1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 361 (2014).
  35. P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019).
  36. A. Shnirman, Y. Makhlin, and G. Schön, Noise and decoherence in quantum two-level systems, Phys. Scr. 2002, 147 (2002).
  37. F. Yoshihara, K. Harrabi, A. O. Niskanen, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Decoherence of flux qubits due to 1/f flux noiser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167001 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation