- Letter
- Access by Xinjiang University
Cross-frequency stochastic gravitational-wave background anisotropy from compact topology: CMB -mode covariance as a transfer probe
Phys. Rev. D 114, L081301 – Published 2 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ynqz-ykc9
Abstract
Compact spatial topology restricts the eigenmodes of primordial tensor perturbations, and the resulting discreteness can render the primordial stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) anisotropic. Here we treat the CMB tensor -mode covariance as a transfer-filtered measurement of that ultra-low-frequency anisotropy. Writing the normalized angular tensor-power measure as and its nonmonopole moments as , we obtain an explicit kernel that maps onto the off-diagonal covariance . The kernel factorizes into tensor transfer functions and a spin-weighted Gaunt coefficient and obeys the parity rule even for and odd for . It is an exact source-response representation of the full compact covariance rather than an additional observable. For a cubic three-torus the geometry pins down a common cubic angular subspace and orientation across frequency bands, although the amplitudes of the allowed multipoles still depend on the radial shell and source spectrum. The same topology-restricted template can therefore be read out either through the CMB -mode kernel or through the anisotropy response of PTA/LISA/Taiji/TianQin searches. Using CAMB transfer functions and an invariant anisotropic-template statistic, we contrast this tensor channel with the scalar covariance. Independent direct angular-shell sums and -Gaunt contractions agree at to relative Frobenius residuals of . The scalar sector holds most of the practical CMB topology information; a fixed-template scan places the combined full-sky transition between and 2.36, while the -mode channel remains subthreshold but isolates the primordial SGWB contribution. We use these results to set out a cross-frequency template for future topology searches.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (32)
- M. Lachièze-Rey and J.-P. Luminet, Phys. Rep. 254, 135 (1995).
- J. Levin, Phys. Rep. 365, 251 (2002).
- N. J. Cornish, D. N. Spergel, and G. D. Starkman, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 2657 (1998).
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A18 (2016).
- P. Petersen et al. (COMPACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2023) 030.
- Y. Akrami et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 171501 (2024).
- J. R. Eskilt et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2024) 036.
- A. Samandar, J. Carrón Duque, C. J. Copi, M. Martin Barandiaran, D. P. Mihaylov, G. D. Starkman, Y. Akrami, S. Anselmi, F. Cornet-Gomez, J. R. Eskilt, A. H. Jaffe, A. Kosowsky, A. Negro, J. Noltmann, T. S. Pereira, and A. Tamosiunas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 015.
- M. Shiraishi, D. F. Mota, A. Ricciardone, and F. Arroja, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2014) 047.
- T. Hiramatsu, S. Yokoyama, T. Fujita, and I. Obata, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083522 (2018).
- A. Samandar, J. Carrón Duque, C. J. Copi, M. Martin Barandiaran, D. P. Mihaylov, T. S. Pereira, G. D. Starkman, Y. Akrami, S. Anselmi, F. Cornet-Gomez, J. R. Eskilt, A. H. Jaffe, A. Kosowsky, and A. Tamosiunas (COMPACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 020.
- M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1830 (1997).
- M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and A. Stebbins, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7368 (1997).
- J. R. Pritchard and M. Kamionkowski, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 318, 2 (2005).
- J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, Living Rev. Relativity 20, 2 (2017).
- C. M. F. Mingarelli, T. Sidery, I. Mandel, and A. Vecchio, Phys. Rev. D 88, 062005 (2013).
- S. R. Taylor and J. R. Gair, Phys. Rev. D 88, 084001 (2013).
- G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 956, L3 (2023).
- N. Bartolo et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2022) 009.
- Z.-C. Zhao and S. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 120411 (2024).
- J. N. Goldberg, A. J. Macfarlane, E. T. Newman, F. Rohrlich, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 2155 (1967).
- M. Hamermesh, Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1962).
- A. Riazuelo, J.-P. Uzan, R. Lehoucq, and J. Weeks, Phys. Rev. D 69, 103514 (2004).
- P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), arXiv:1702.00786.
- Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, W. Hu, and G. Jin, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A108 (2021).
- J. Luo et al. (TianQin Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 035010 (2016).
- M. A. Rubin and C. R. Ordóñez, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 25, 2888 (1984).
- K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68, 310 (1982).
- M. Tegmark, A. N. Taylor, and A. F. Heavens, Astrophys. J. 480, 22 (1997).
- A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000).
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP/Keck Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021).