Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Perturbative analysis of CPT-odd Lorentz-violating scalar QCD

J. C. C. Felipe1,*, L. C. T. Brito2,†, A. C. Lehum3,‡, B. Altschul4,§, and A. Yu Petrov5,∥

  • *Contact author: jeanccfelipe@ufsj.edu.br
  • Contact author: lcbrito@ufla.br
  • Contact author: lehum@ufpa.br
  • §Contact author: altschul@mailbox.sc.edu
  • Contact author: petrov@fisica.ufpb.br

Phys. Rev. D 114, 035027 – Published 19 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yb6p-8q8s

Abstract

We perform a complete one-loop renormalization analysis of CPT-odd Lorentz-violating scalar quantum chromodynamics with adjoint scalar matter. Working to first order in the preferred background vector and treating the corresponding operators as perturbative insertions, we compute the ultraviolet-divergent parts of the relevant two-, three-, and four-point Green’s functions for the gauge, scalar, and ghost fields. We show that the gauge sector develops the expected Carroll-Field-Jackiw-type correction, which generically turns out to be divergent in our theory, although the divergence vanishes in a certain gauge, while the scalar sector displays the corresponding CPT-odd single-derivative term proportional to the background vector. We further demonstrate that several of the Lorentz-violating corrections the three- and four-point function are ultraviolet finite. All one-loop divergences may be absorbed into counterterms already allowed by the classical Lagrangian, providing an explicit proof of the multiplicative renormalizability of the theory at this order. We also obtain the associated renormalization constants and one-loop β functions for the gauge coupling, the Lorentz violation parameters, and the scalar self-interaction.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (32)

  1. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997).
  2. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998).
  3. V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 69, 105009 (2004).
  4. R. Jackiw, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14, 2011 (2000).
  5. R. Jackiw and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999).
  6. M. Pérez-Victoria, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2001) 032.
  7. B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 99, 125009 (2019).
  8. V. A. Kostelecký, C. D. Lane, and A. G. M. Pickering, Phys. Rev. D 65, 056006 (2002).
  9. T. Mariz, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Lorentz Symmetry Breaking—Classical and Quantum Aspects (Springer Nature, Cham, 2022).
  10. A. F. Ferrari, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 459 (2020).
  11. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 75, 105002 (2007).
  12. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 77, 085006 (2008).
  13. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 79, 125019 (2009).
  14. A. P. Baeta Scarpelli, H. Belich, J. L. Boldo, and J. A. Helayël-Neto, Phys. Rev. D 67, 085021 (2003).
  15. B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045008 (2012).
  16. L. C. T. Brito, H. G. Fargnoli, and A. P. Baêta Scarpelli, Phys. Rev. D 87, 125023 (2013).
  17. A. P. Baeta Scarpelli, L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 850 (2017).
  18. A. P. Baêta Scarpelli, J. C. C. Felipe, L. C. T. Brito, and A. Yu. Petrov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 37, 2250100 (2022).
  19. B. Altschul, L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, S. Karki, A. C. Lehum, and A. Yu. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D 107, 045005 (2023).
  20. B. Altschul, L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, S. Karki, A. C. Lehum, and A. Yu. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115002 (2023).
  21. A. C. Lehum, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138519 (2024).
  22. B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045004 (2006).
  23. O. W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 231602 (2002).
  24. R. Mertig, M. Böhm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
  25. T. Hahn and M. Pérez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  26. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  27. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 345 (2016).
  28. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2024).
  29. S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973); see also E. J. Weinberg, arXiv:hep-th/0507214.
  30. B. Altschul, Nucl. Phys. B705, 593 (2005).
  31. V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1818 (1998).
  32. Z. Bern, J. P. Gatica, E. Herrmann, A. Luna, and M. Zeng, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 131.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation