Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Systematic study of fully heavy-flavored tetraquarks Q1Q2Q¯1Q¯2 (Q1,2{b,c}): Mass spectra, threshold analysis, and confrontation with LHC data

A. A. Atangana Likéné1,2,*, F. Rothen1,†, D. Nga Ongodo2,‡, G. H. Ben-Bolie2,§, and T. Golling1,∥

  • 1Department of Particle Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Geneva, P.O. Box 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 2Laboratory of Nuclear, Atomic and Molecular Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I, P.O. Box 812, Yaounde, Cameroon

  • *Contact author: Andre.Atangana@etu.unige.ch, aandreaime@yahoo.fr
  • Contact author: franck.rothen@unige.ch
  • Contact author: ngadieudonne@yahoo.fr
  • §Contact author: gbenbolie@yahoo.fr
  • Contact author: tobias.golling@unige.ch

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034025 – Published 12 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y15p-jk18

Abstract

Experimental searches for fully heavy flavored tetraquark states are actively pursued at the LHC. The LHCb, CMS, and ATLAS collaborations have investigated fully charmed ccc¯c¯, doubly charmed-bottom bcb¯c¯ and fully bottom bbb¯b¯ tetraquarks. Fully charmed states are probed as intermediate resonances in processes like p+pJ/ψJ/ψ and p+pJ/ψμ+μ at s=7,8, and 13 TeV. Notably, narrow structures such as X(6200), X(6900), and X(7300) observed in the di-J/ψ mass spectrum have ignited theoretical interest. In this study, we use a nonrelativistic model to perform a detailed study of the mass spectra for the ground (1S) and excited (1P, 2S, 1D, 2P, 3S, and 4S) states of fully heavy tetraquarks Q1Q2Q¯1Q¯2 (Q1,2{b,c}) in the diquark-antiquark picture. Tetraquarks are modeled as color-singlet bound states build from an axial-vector diquark ([Q1Q2]s=1) and axial-vector antidiquark ([Q¯1Q¯2]s=1) in the 3¯ and 3 color representations, respectively, bound together by color forces. With this setup, the Schrödinger equation is solved numerically for a modified version of the Cornell potential, using the three-point difference central method. The spin-dependent terms are dealt with nonperturbatively and are used to describe the splitting structure of the diquark. The tetraquark states are investigated for a wide range of JPC quantum numbers including 0++, 1+, 2++ for S-waves, 0+, 1±, 2±, 3 for P-waves, and 0++, 1+±, 2+±, 3+±, 4++ for D-waves. Following the same line as many previous works, we attempt, through this study of tetraquark mass spectra, to provide their possible signatures in narrow structures recently discovered in the di-J/ψ production spectrum by the LHCb, CMS, and ATLAS collaborations. Our results provide precise mass predictions, analyze stability against strong fall-apart decays, and are directly compared with recent LHC observations and other relevant theoretical models. Our findings supports the interpretation of these discovered exotic heavy resonances as the different excitations of the fully charmed tetraquark, offering a crucial guide for ongoing experimental identification.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (82)

  1. Y. Iwasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 492 (1975).
  2. L. Heller and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. D 32, 755 (1985).
  3. S. L. Olsen, Front. Phys. 10, 101401 (2015).
  4. A. Esposito, A. L. Guerrieri, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1530002 (2014).
  5. N. Brambilla et al. (Heavy Quarkonium Working Group), Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1534 (2011).
  6. M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rep. 497, 41 (2010).
  7. X. W. Kang and J. A. Oller, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 399 (2017).
  8. R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 222002 (2014).
  9. M. Nielsen and F. S. Navarra, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1430005 (2014).
  10. S. K. Choi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262 (2003).
  11. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2025, 083C01 (2025).
  12. N. A. Tornqvist, Phys. Lett. B 590, 209 (2004).
  13. R. Aaij et al., Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020).
  14. The CMS Collaboration, Observation of new structures in the J/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum in pp collisions at s=13mTeV, Report No. CMS-PAS-BPH-21-003; Technical report; CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  15. The ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of an excess of di-charmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2022-040; Technical report; CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  16. R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  17. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  18. R. Aaij et al., J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 086.
  19. V. Khachatryan et al., J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 013.
  20. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Phys. Lett. B 808, 135578 (2020).
  21. L. C. Bland et al., arXiv:1909.03124.
  22. F. K. Guo, C. Manhart, U. G. Meibner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018).
  23. A. Ali, L. Maiani, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Hadrons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019).
  24. I. Bigi, Y. Dokshitzer, V. Khoze, J. Kühn, and P. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 181, 157 (1986).
  25. D. Nga Ongodo, A. A. Atangana Likéné, J. M. Ema’a Ema’a, P. Ele Abiama, and G. H. Ben-Bolie, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 400 (2025).
  26. D. Nga Ongodo, A. A. Atangana Likéné, J. M. Ema’a Ema’a, P. Ele Abiama, and G. H. Ben-Bolie, Nucl. Phys. A1063123215 (2025).
  27. W. J. Deng, H. Liu, L. C. Gui, and X. H. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074002 (2017).
  28. B. Q. Li and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094004 (2009).
  29. K. T. Chao and J. H. Liu, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Weak Interactions and CP Violation, Beijing, 1989, edited by T. Huang and D. D. Wu (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990), p. 109.
  30. Y. B. Ding, K. T. Chao, and D. H. Qin, Chin. Phys. Lett. 10, 460 (1993).
  31. B. Q. Li and K. T. Chao, Commun. Theor. Phys. 52, 653 (2009).
  32. E. Laermann, F. Langhammer, I. Schmitt, and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 173, 437 (1986).
  33. K. D. Born, E. Laermann, N. Pirch, T. F. Walsh, and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1653 (1989).
  34. For a recent example, using a lattice gluon progagator see: A. Cucchieri, T. Mendes, and W. M. Serenone, Braz. J. Phys. 49, 548 (2019).
  35. C.-H. Cai and L. Li, Chin. Phys. C 27, 1005 (2003).
  36. D. R. Bipolo, S. Y. Loemba Mouandza, A. A. Atangana Likéné, H. D. Yia Etolo, T. B. Ekogo, and G. H. Ben-Bolie, Nucl. Phys. A1066, 123266 (2026).
  37. R. Mistry and A. Majethiya, Chin. J. Phys. (Taipei) 91, 932 (2024).
  38. V. R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, Chin. Phys. C 43, 013105 (2019).
  39. A. A. Atangana Likéné, D. Nga Ongodo, J. M. Ema’a Ema’a, P. Ele Abiama, and G. H. Ben-Bolie, Few Body Syst. 64, 83 (2023).
  40. R. Jamshidzadeh, M. Monemzadeh, and N. Tazimi, Phys. Scr. 100, 075304 (2025).
  41. E. Eichten et al., Phys. Rev. D 21, 203 (1980).
  42. E. Eichten, S. Godfrey, H. Mahlke, and J. L. Rosner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1161 (2008).
  43. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  44. D. M. Brink and F. Stancu, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4665 (1994).
  45. T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005).
  46. W. Lucha, F. F. Schöberl, and D. Gromes, Phys. Rep. 200, 127 (1991).
  47. H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of Atoms of One- and Two- Electrons (Springer, New York, 1957).
  48. V. R. Debastiani, Spectroscopy of the all-charm tetraquark, Master thesis, Instituto de Física, Universidade de Sao Paulo (2016), doi:10.11606/D.43.2016.tde-08072016-001417.
  49. F. Stancu, Group Theory in Subnuclear Physics (Oxford University Press, 1996).
  50. D. M. Brink and F. Stancu, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6778 (1998).
  51. W. Park and S. H. Lee, Nucl. Phys. A925, 161 (2014).
  52. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloe, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley-VHC, New York, 1978), Vol. 2.
  53. L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005).
  54. L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 114010 (2014).
  55. D. Griffiths, Introduction to Elementary Particles, 2nd revised ed. (Wiley-VCH, New York, 2008).
  56. T. Muta, Foundations of Quantum Chromodynamics: An Introduction to Perturbative Methods in Gauge Theories, 3rd ed., World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 78 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010).
  57. R. Fayyazuddin, A Modern Introduction to Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2011).
  58. N. Amiri, S. M. Moosavi Nejad, A. Armat, and M. Farhadi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 498 (2022).
  59. M. Salajegheh, S. M. Moosavi Nejad, H. Khanpour, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Soleymaninia, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114001 (2019).
  60. S. M. Moosavi Nejad and M. Balali, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 173 (2016).
  61. M. Salajegheh, S. M. Moosavi Nejad, H. Khanpour, and S. A. Tehrani, Phys. Rev. C 97, 055201 (2018).
  62. S. M. Moosavi Nejad, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114021 (2017).
  63. M. Karliner, S. Nussinov, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034011 (2017).
  64. A. V. Berezhnoy, A. V. Luchinsky, and A. A. Novoselov, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034004 (2012).
  65. R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and E. M. Savchenko, Symmetry 14, 2504 (2022).
  66. D. V. Bugg, J. Phys. G 35, 075005 (2008).
  67. J. Gasser, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. Rusetsky, Phys. Rep. 456, 167 (2008).
  68. J. Vijande, N. Barnea, and A. Valcarce, Nucl. Phys. A790, 542 (2007).
  69. J. M. Richard, A. Valcarce, and J. Vijande, Phys. Rev. D 95, 054019 (2017).
  70. J. M. Richard, A. Valcarce, and J. Vijande, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 412, 168009 (2020).
  71. X. K. Dong, V. Baru, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and A. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 132001 (2021).
  72. C. Hughes, E. Eichten, and C. T. H. Davies, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054505 (2018).
  73. A. Hayrapetyan et al., Nature (London) 648, 58 (2025).
  74. R. J. Lloyd and J. P. Vary, Phys. Rev. D 70, 014009 (2004).
  75. V. R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, Proc. Sci., Hadron2017 (2018) 238.
  76. R. Tiwari, D. P. Rathaud, and A. K. Rai, Indian J. Phys. 97, 943 (2023).
  77. J. Zhao, S. Shi, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114001 (2020).
  78. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114039 (2020).
  79. J. A. Lesteiro-Tejeda, D. A. Ramírez-Zaldívar, C. E. Gracía-Trápaga, and F. Guzmán-Martínez, arXiv:2101.03192.
  80. F. X. Liu, M. S. Liu, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116029 (2021).
  81. Q. F. Lü, D. Y. Chen, and Y. B. Dong, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 871 (2020).
  82. M. S. liu, F. X. Liu, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, arXiv:2006.11952.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation