Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Test for eccentric binaries based on the spin-induced quadrupole moment

N. V. Krishnendu*

  • *Contact author: k.naderivarium@bham.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 124008 – Published 3 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xmv7-sxll

Abstract

The spin-induced quadrupole moment-based test of black hole nature is routinely used to probe the true nature of detected binary signals, assuming a circular orbit. We extend the applicability of the method to binaries in eccentric orbits. Considering simulated signals of varying masses, spins, and signal strengths, we demonstrate how the systematic errors resulting from neglecting orbital eccentricity compare with the statistical errors, using a semianalytic Fisher matrix-based formalism that accounts for both current and future detectors. Further, we quantify the systematic errors by developing a Bayesian inference framework for the current detector network. The inspiral-only aligned-spin gravitational wave waveform model for eccentric binaries, TaylorF2Ecc, is employed. For the current detector network, neglecting an initial eccentricity of e0inj=0.1 defined at 20 Hz can lead to a serious bias in binary parameter inference. Notably, a nearly equal mass, moderately spinning binary black hole in an eccentric orbit can be identified as a nonblack hole binary with extreme spins and asymmetric masses. We demonstrate the criticality of biased estimates that may arise when neglecting the orbital eccentricity while performing tests of black hole nature and discuss prospects.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (106)

  1. N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 091101 (2017).
  2. N. V. Krishnendu, C. K. Mishra, and K. G. Arun, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064008 (2019).
  3. N. V. Krishnendu, M. Saleem, A. Samajdar, K. G. Arun, W. Del Pozzo, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104019 (2019).
  4. F. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1845 (1997).
  5. V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084014 (2017); 95, 089901(A) (2017).
  6. V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084014 (2017).
  7. C. Pacilio, M. Vaglio, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 102, 083002 (2020).
  8. N. Uchikata and S. Yoshida, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 025005 (2016).
  9. N. Uchikata, S. Yoshida, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 94, 064015 (2016).
  10. N. K. Johnson-Mcdaniel, A. Mukherjee, R. Kashyap, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123010 (2020).
  11. G. Pappas and T. A. Apostolatos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 231104 (2012).
  12. G. Pappas and T. A. Apostolatos, arXiv:1211.6299.
  13. K. Yagi, K. Kyutoku, G. Pappas, N. Yunes, and T. A. Apostolatos, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124013 (2014).
  14. T. P. Sotiriou and T. A. Apostolatos, Phys. Rev. D 71, 044005 (2005).
  15. T. A. Apostolatos and T. P. Sotiriou, AIP Conf. Proc. 848, 677 (2006).
  16. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 993, L21 (2025).
  17. N. V. Krishnendu et al., arXiv:2511.17341.
  18. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, L44 (2020).
  19. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 102, 043015 (2020).
  20. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
  21. P. Saini and N. V. Krishnendu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024009 (2024).
  22. S. Marsat, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 085008 (2015).
  23. S. Marsat, A. Bohé, L. Blanchet, and A. Buonanno, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 025023 (2014).
  24. C. K. Mishra, A. Kela, K. G. Arun, and G. Faye, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084054 (2016).
  25. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), arXiv:2111.03606.
  26. Divyajyoti, N. V. Krishnendu, M. Saleem, M. Colleoni, A. Vijaykumar, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023016 (2024).
  27. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 970, L34 (2024).
  28. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 892, L3 (2020).
  29. S. Schmidt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 201401 (2024).
  30. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L5 (2021).
  31. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  32. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
  33. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
  34. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), arXiv:2508.18082.
  35. G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Astrophys. J. Lett. 1000, L2 (2026).
  36. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), arXiv:2508.18083.
  37. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), arXiv:2508.18081.
  38. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 995, L18 (2025).
  39. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), arXiv:2508.18079.
  40. P. Peters and J. Mathews, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963).
  41. P. Peters, Phys. Rev. 136, B1224 (1964).
  42. J. Samsing, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103014 (2018).
  43. R. M. O’Leary, F. A. Rasio, J. M. Fregeau, N. Ivanova, and R. W. O’Shaughnessy, Astrophys. J. 637, 937 (2006).
  44. G. Fragione and B. Kocsis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 4781 (2019).
  45. J. Kumamoto, M. S. Fujii, and A. Tanikawa, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 3942 (2019).
  46. L. Gondán and B. Kocsis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506, 1665 (2021).
  47. L. Gondán, B. Kocsis, P. Raffai, and Z. Frei, Astrophys. J. 855, 34 (2018).
  48. B.-M. Hoang, S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, F. A. Rasio, and F. Dosopoulou, Astrophys. J. 856, 140 (2018).
  49. J. H. VanLandingham, M. C. Miller, D. P. Hamilton, and D. C. Richardson, Astrophys. J. 828, 77 (2016).
  50. T. Osburn, N. Warburton, and C. R. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064024 (2016).
  51. J. Strader, L. Chomiuk, T. J. Maccarone, J. C. A. Miller-Jones, and A. C. Seth, Nature (London) 490, 71 (2012).
  52. L. Chomiuk, J. Strader, T. J. Maccarone, J. C. A. Miller-Jones, C. Heinke, E. Noyola, A. C. Seth, and S. Ransom, Astrophys. J. 777, 69 (2013).
  53. F. Antonini, S. Chatterjee, C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Astrophys. J. 816, 65 (2016).
  54. C. L. Rodriguez, S. Chatterjee, and F. A. Rasio, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084029 (2016).
  55. M. Lidov, Planet. Space Sci. 9, 719 (1962).
  56. Y. Kozai, Astron. J. 67, 591 (1962).
  57. L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, D. O’Neill, J. Takátsy, P. Kirkeberg, C. Tiede, J. Stegmann, J. Samsing, and D. J. D’Orazio, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063005 (2025).
  58. K. Kacanja, K. Soni, and A. H. Nitz, Phys. Rev. D 112, 122007 (2025).
  59. I. Romero-Shaw, J. Stegmann, H. Tagawa, D. Gerosa, J. Samsing, N. Gupte, and S. R. Green, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063052 (2025).
  60. M. d. L. Planas, S. Husa, A. Ramos-Buades, and J. Valencia, Astrophys. J. 995, 47 (2025).
  61. M. d. L. Planas, A. Ramos-Buades, C. García-Quirós, H. Estellés, S. Husa, and M. Haney, Phys. Rev. D 112, 123004 (2025).
  62. R. Dhurkunde and A. H. Nitz, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103018 (2025).
  63. A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, and J. Gair, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124063 (2023).
  64. H. L. Iglesias et al., Astrophys. J. 972, 65 (2024).
  65. N. Gupte et al., Phys. Rev. D 112, 104045 (2025).
  66. E. O’Shea and P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104018 (2023).
  67. I. M. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Astrophys. J. 940, 171 (2022).
  68. I. M. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Astrophys. J. Lett. 921, L31 (2021).
  69. K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, and G. Pratten, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043040 (2025).
  70. M. Favata, C. Kim, K. G. Arun, J. Kim, and H. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023003 (2022).
  71. M. Favata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 101101 (2014).
  72. P. Narayan, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, and A. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064003 (2023).
  73. P. Saini, M. Favata, and K. G. Arun, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084031 (2022).
  74. M. A. Shaikh, S. A. Bhat, and S. J. Kapadia, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024030 (2024).
  75. P. Dutta Roy and P. Saini, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024002 (2024).
  76. W. G. Laarakkers and E. Poisson, Astrophys. J. 512, 282 (1999).
  77. J. Vines and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. D 97, 064010 (2018).
  78. O. Sridhar, S. Bhattacharyya, K. Paul, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024026 (2025).
  79. S. U. Naqvi and C. K. Mishra, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3177, 012081 (2026).
  80. A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084043 (2009).
  81. B. Moore, M. Favata, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124061 (2016).
  82. S. V. Dhurandhar, A. Królak, B. Schutz, and J. Watkins (Unpublished).
  83. M. Favata, Phys. Rev. D 80, 024002 (2009).
  84. V. Cardoso, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. Vicente, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023015 (2021).
  85. S. Datta, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1138 (2025).
  86. M. Bošković, M. Koschnitzke, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 121401 (2024).
  87. S. Kumar, M. Melching, and F. Ohme, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104071 (2025).
  88. U. Dupletsa, J. Harms, K. K. Y. Ng, J. Tissino, F. Santoliquido, and A. Cozzumbo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024036 (2025).
  89. E. K. Porter and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 91, 104001 (2015).
  90. M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008).
  91. S. Babak, A. Petiteau, and M. Hewitson, arXiv:2108.01167.
  92. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017).
  93. D. Reitze et al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019).
  94. M. Punturo et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084007 (2010).
  95. S. Hild et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 094013 (2011).
  96. B. Sathyaprakash et al., in 46th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitational Waves and Experimental Gravity (2011), pp. 127–136, arXiv:1108.1423.
  97. N. V. Krishnendu and A. B. Yelikar, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 205019 (2020).
  98. B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and Virgo Collaborations), Living Rev. Relativity 19, 1 (2016).
  99. G. M. Harry (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084006 (2010).
  100. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  101. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  102. F. Acernese et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 23, S635 (2006).
  103. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1200087-v42/public (2022).
  104. G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084052 (2025).
  105. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/bear.
  106. Spin-induced quadrupole moment based test for eccentric binaries, GitLab repository, public data release, https://gitlab.com/KrishnenduGit/siqm_ecc.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation