Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scalar vacuum polarization in loop-quantum-gravity black holes

Antonino Flachi1,* and Marco Pasini2,†

  • 1Department of Physics and Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan
  • 2Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Physics, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy

  • *Contact author: flachi@keio.jp
  • †Contact author: pasini.marco@spes.uniud.it

Phys. Rev. D 114, 105003 – Published 4 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/th33-bhyd

Abstract

A quantum macroscopic “Kruskal” black hole solution that incorporates quantum geometry effects has been derived in loop quantum gravity as the counterpart to the classical Schwarzschild solution with a distinct imprint outside the event horizon, even at scales much larger than the Planck length. This resulting black hole quantum geometry is supported by an effective energy density of quantum origin, outside the horizon, which prevents asymptotic flatness at large distances and confines massive particles to finite radii, thereby preventing their escape to infinity. In this work, we adapt to these solutions the extended Anderson-Candelas-Christensen-DeWitt approach to compute the quantum vacuum polarization in order to provide an accurate measure of the quantum activity around these black holes. We carry out a numerical implementation of the formalism and present, to our knowledge for the first time, the scalar vacuum polarization ⟨ϕ2⟩ exterior to this quantum-corrected geometry. We find that the quantum-gravity exponent ε enhances the near-horizon polarization and induces, farther out, a small negative tail that we identify—through a parameter-free DeWitt-Schwinger comparison—with the field’s response to the nonzero curvature of the background (absent for Ricci-flat Schwarzschild). The correction scales linearly with ε, the parameter tracking the quantum gravitational corrections, so that, for astrophysically realistic (i.e., tiny) ε, the result is numerically indistinguishable from Schwarzschild. The calculation furnishes a consistency check on the quantum activity around these solutions, the fluctuations tracking the local curvature without anomalous growth in the exterior.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. C. G. Boehmer and K. Vandersloot, Phys. Rev. D 76, 104030 (2007).
  2. D. W. Chiou, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064040 (2008).
  3. A. Corichi and P. Singh, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 055006 (2016).
  4. J. Olmedo, S. Saini, and P. Singh, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 225011 (2017).
  5. M. Bouhmadi-López, S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, P. Chen, and D.-h. Yeom, Phys. Dark Universe 30, 100701 (2020).
  6. A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241301 (2018).
  7. A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 98, 126003 (2018).
  8. A. Ashtekar and J. Olmedo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2050076 (2020).
  9. V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Symmetry 12, 1264 (2020).
  10. P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2185 (1980).
  11. B. S. DeWitt, Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965).
  12. S. M. Christensen, Phys. Rev. D 17, 946 (1978).
  13. P. R. Anderson, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1152 (1990); 39, 3785 (1989).
  14. K. Shiraishi and T. Maki, Classical Quantum Gravity 11, 695 (1994).
  15. A. Tomimatsu and H. Koyama, Phys. Rev. D 61, 124010 (2000).
  16. E. Winstanley and P. M. Young, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024008 (2008).
  17. A. Flachi and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064011 (2008).
  18. M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, Z. H. Saleem, and A. Satz, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 130.
  19. A. Flachi, G. M. Quinta, and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 94, 105001 (2016).
  20. T. Morley, E. Winstanley, and P. Taylor, Phys. Rev. D 103, 045007 (2021).
  21. G. M. Quinta, A. Flachi, and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124073 (2016).
  22. V. Frolov, S. V. Sushkov, and A. Zelnikov, Phys. Rev. D 67, 104003 (2003).
  23. C. Breen and P. Taylor, Phys. Rev. D 94, 125024 (2016).
  24. R. T. Thompson and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 80, 064017 (2009).
  25. C. Breen and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D 82, 084019 (2010).
  26. A. Boasso and F. D. Mazzitelli, Phys. Rev. D 112, 105016 (2025).
  27. F. Moulin, K. Martineau, J. Grain, and A. Barrau, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 125003 (2019).
  28. B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rep. 207, 49 (1991).
  29. K. Sanders, Lett. Math. Phys. 105, 575 (2015).
  30. C. Gérard, Rev. Math. Phys. 33, 2150028 (2021).
  31. P. R. Anderson, W. A. Hiscock, and D. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4337 (1995).
  32. C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 111, L081504 (2025).
  33. V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024014 (2022).
  34. 10.5281/zenodo.20983480.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation