Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Anomaly of 4D Weyl fermions with discrete symmetries

Zheyan Wan*

  • *Contact author: wanzheyan@bimsa.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 036032 – Published 25 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sq16-k99s

Abstract

We derive explicit anomaly-index formulas for four-dimensional Weyl fermions charged under the finite symmetries Spin×Zn and Spin×Z2FZ2mF. The strategy is to start from the standard perturbative anomaly indices for Spin×U(1) and Spin×Z2FU(1)=Spinc, and then restrict the continuous U(1) symmetry to a finite cyclic subgroup. On the level of invertible field theories this gives natural homomorphisms, TP5(Spin×U(1))TP5(Spin×Zn),TP5(Spinc)TP5(Spin×Z2FZ2mF). We compute these maps explicitly by evaluating reduced η invariants on geometric representatives of the finite anomaly groups. For Spin×Zn, the relevant backgrounds are the five-dimensional lens-space bundle X(n;1,1) and the product L(n;1)×K3. For Spin×Z2FZ2mF, the relevant backgrounds are L(m;1,1,1) and, depending on the parity of m, either L(m;1)×Enriques or L(m;1)×K3. The output is a pair of integer-valued anomaly indices for each finite symmetry. These indices are normalized in the cyclic factors of the finite anomaly group, so they can be used directly in anomaly-cancellation checks for fermions with discrete gauge or global symmetries. They also provide the input for symmetry-extension applications to topologically ordered quantum dark matter: in Standard Model examples, the indices identify the discrete B+L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly left by missing sterile right-handed neutrinos and the finite K-gauge topological sector that can match it.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. Juven Wang, Topological quantum dark matter via global anomaly cancellation, arXiv:2502.21319.
  2. Zheyan Wan and Juven Wang, Anomalous (3+1)D fermionic topological quantum field theories via symmetry extension, arXiv:2512.25038.
  3. Zheyan Wan, Juven Wang, and Shing-Tung Yau, Fermion families and Pontryagin class: Topological field theory via colour symmetry extension, arXiv:2605.26202.
  4. Luis E. Ibanez and Graham G. Ross, Discrete gauge symmetry anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 260, 291 (1991).
  5. John Preskill, Sandip P. Trivedi, Frank Wilczek, and Mark B. Wise, Cosmology and broken discrete symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B363, 207 (1991).
  6. Tom Banks and Michael Dine, Note on discrete gauge anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 45, 1424 (1992).
  7. Luis E. Ibanez, More about discrete gauge anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B398, 301 (1993).
  8. Chang-Tse Hsieh, Discrete gauge anomalies revisited, arXiv:1808.02881.
  9. Iñaki García-Etxebarria and Miguel Montero, Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 003.
  10. P. B. Gilkey, The eta invariant and the K-theory of odd-dimensional spherical space forms, Inventiones Math. 76, 421 (1984).
  11. Anthony Bahri and Peter Gilkey, The eta invariant, Pinc bordism, and equivariant Spinc bordism for cyclic 2-groups, Pac. J. Math. 128, 1 (1987).
  12. Peter B. Gilkey and Boris Botvinnik, The eta invariant and the equivariant spin bordism of spherical space form 2 groups, in New developments in differential geometry (Debrecen, 1994), Math. Appl. (Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht, 1996), Vol. 350, pp. 213–223.
  13. Boris Botvinnik, Peter Gilkey, and Stephan Stolz, The Gromov-Lawson-Rosenberg conjecture for groups with periodic cohomology, J. Diff. Geom. 45, 374 (1997).
  14. Egidio Barrera-Yanez and Peter B. Gilkey, The eta invariant and the connective K-theory of the classifying space for cyclic 2 groups, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 17, 289 (1999).
  15. Peter B. Gilkey, The Geometry of Spherical Space Form Groups, 2nd ed., Series in Pure Mathematics (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2018), Vol. 28, pp. xiii+493.
  16. Daniel S. Freed and Michael J. Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases, Geom. Topol. 25, 1165 (2021).
  17. Csaba Csaki and Hitoshi Murayama, Discrete anomaly matching, Nucl. Phys. B515, 114 (1998).
  18. Takeshi Araki, Tatsuo Kobayashi, Jisuke Kubo, Saul Ramos-Sanchez, Michael Ratz, and Patrick K. S. Vaudrevange, (Non-)Abelian discrete anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B805, 124 (2008).
  19. Juven C. Wang, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen, Field theory representation of gauge-gravity symmetry-protected topological invariants, group cohomology and beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 031601 (2015).
  20. Anton Kapustin, Ryan Thorngren, Alex Turzillo, and Zitao Wang, Fermionic symmetry protected topological phases and cobordisms, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 052.
  21. Kazuya Yonekura, Dai-Freed theorem and topological phases of matter, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2016) 022.
  22. Meng Guo, Kantaro Ohmori, Pavel Putrov, Zheyan Wan, and Juven Wang, Fermionic finite-group Gauge theories and interacting symmetric/crystalline orders via cobordisms, Commun. Math. Phys. 376, 1073 (2020).
  23. Edward Witten and Kazuya Yonekura, Anomaly Inflow and the η-invariant, in The Shoucheng Zhang Memorial Workshop (World Scientific, 2021).
  24. Clay Córdova and Kantaro Ohmori, Anomaly constraints on gapped phases with discrete chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 102, 025011 (2020).
  25. Meng Cheng, Juven Wang, and Xinping Yang, (3+1)D boundary topological order of (4+1)D fermionic SPT state, Phys. Rev. B 113, 125105 (2026).
  26. Pavel Putrov and Juven Wang, Categorical symmetry of the standard model from gravitational anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 110, 125028 (2024).
  27. Juven Wang, Topological leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, L022024 (2026).
  28. Luis Alvarez-Gaume and Edward Witten, Gravitational anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984).
  29. Luis Alvarez-Gaume and Paul H. Ginsparg, The structure of gauge and gravitational anomalies, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 161, 423 (1985); 171, 233(E) (1986).
  30. Xianzhe Dai and Daniel S Freed, η-invariants and determinant lines, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 35, 5155 (1994).
  31. Edward Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035001 (2016).
  32. Edward Witten, The “parity” anomaly on an unorientable manifold, Phys. Rev. B 94, 195150 (2016).
  33. H. Blaine Lawson and Marie-Louise Michelsohn, Spin Geometry, Princeton Mathematical Series (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989), Vol. 38.
  34. John W. Milnor and James D. Stasheff, Characteristic Classes, Annals of Mathematics Studies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974), Vol. 76.
  35. A. Franc, Spin structures and Killing spinors on lens spaces, J. Geom. Phys. 4, 277 (1987).
  36. Juven Wang, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Edward Witten, Symmetric gapped interfaces of SPT and set states: Systematic constructions, Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation