Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

How theory-informed priors affect DESI evidence for evolving dark energy

Michael W. Toomey1,*, Gabriele Montefalcone2,†, Evan McDonough3,‡, and Katherine Freese2,4,5,§

  • *Contact author: mtoomey@mit.edu
  • Contact author: montefalcone@utexas.edu
  • Contact author: e.mcdonough@uwinnipeg.ca
  • §Contact author: ktfreese@utexas.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 123532 – Published 15 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/snyr-qs56

Abstract

Recent measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs) from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) have been interpreted to suggest that dark energy may be evolving. In this work, we examine how prior choices affect such conclusions. Specifically, we study the biases introduced by the customary use of uniform priors on the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameters, w0 and wa, when assessing evidence for evolving dark energy. To do so, we construct theory-informed priors on (w0,wa) using a normalizing flow (NF), trained on two representative quintessence models, which learns the distribution of these parameters conditional on the underlying Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) parameters. In the combined Planck CMB+DESI BAO analysis, we find that the apparent tension with a cosmological constant in the CPL framework can be reduced from 3.1σ to 1.3σ once theory-informed priors are applied, rendering the result effectively consistent with ΛCDM. For completeness, we also analyze combinations that include Type Ia supernova data, showing similar shifts toward the ΛCDM limit. Taken together, the observed sensitivity to prior choices in these analyses arises because uniform priors—often mischaracterized as “uninformative”—can actually bias inferences toward unphysical parameter regions. Consequently, our results underscore the importance of adopting physically motivated priors to ensure robust cosmological inferences, especially when evaluating new hypotheses with only marginal statistical support. Lastly, our NF-based framework achieves these results by postprocessing existing MCMC chains, requiring 1h of additional CPU compute time on top of the base analysis—a dramatic speedup over direct model sampling that highlights the scalability of this approach for testing diverse theoretical models.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (124)

  1. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 021.
  2. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14738.
  3. M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213 (2001).
  4. E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003).
  5. A. Chudaykin, M. M. Ivanov, and O. H. E. Philcox, arXiv:2507.13433.
  6. K. Lodha et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14743.
  7. K. Lodha et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, 023532 (2025).
  8. O. Luongo and M. Muccino, Astron. Astrophys. 690, A40 (2024).
  9. A. J. Shajib and J. A. Frieman, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063508 (2025).
  10. J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123519 (2024).
  11. D. Shlivko, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. L. Steinhardt, arXiv:2504.02028.
  12. G. Efstathiou, arXiv:2505.02658.
  13. Y. Wang and K. Freese, arXiv:2505.17415.
  14. H. Cheng, E. Di Valentino, L. A. Escamilla, A. A. Sen, and L. Visinelli, arXiv:2505.02932.
  15. P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Astrophys. J. Lett. 325, L17 (1988).
  16. B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3406 (1988).
  17. R. R. Caldwell, Phys. Lett. B 545, 23 (2002).
  18. W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 71, 047301 (2005).
  19. S. Das, P. S. Corasaniti, and J. Khoury, Phys. Rev. D 73, 083509 (2006).
  20. S. M. Carroll, A. De Felice, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023525 (2005).
  21. J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, arXiv:2503.16415.
  22. G. Huey and B. D. Wandelt, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023519 (2006).
  23. P. Brax, C. P. Burgess, and F. Quevedo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2024) 015.
  24. A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, arXiv:2410.11099.
  25. R. Chen, J. M. Cline, V. Muralidharan, and B. Salewicz, arXiv:2508.19101.
  26. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  27. T. Tröster et al., Astron. Astrophys. 633, L10 (2020).
  28. M. M. Ivanov, M. Simonović, and M. Zaldarriaga, arXiv:1912.08208.
  29. M. M. Ivanov, M. W. Toomey, and N. G. Karaçayl𝚤, arXiv:2405.13208.
  30. R. Trotta, arXiv:1701.01467.
  31. C. L. Steinhardt, P. Phillips, and R. Wojtak, arXiv:2504.03829.
  32. Z. Bayat and M. P. Hertzberg, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 065.
  33. D. Jimenez Rezende and S. Mohamed, arXiv:1505.05770.
  34. G. Papamakarios, T. Pavlakou, and I. Murray, arXiv:1705.07057.
  35. C. Wetterich, Astron. Astrophys. 301, 321 (1995).
  36. P. Binetruy, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063502 (1999).
  37. A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 123.
  38. S. Dutta and R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 78, 123525 (2008).
  39. J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins, and I. Waga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2077 (1995).
  40. G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, arXiv:1806.08362.
  41. P. Agrawal and G. Obied, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 103.
  42. D. Andriot, S. Parameswaran, D. Tsimpis, T. Wrase, and I. Zavala, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 117.
  43. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007).
  44. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010).
  45. I. Broeckel, M. Cicoli, A. Maharana, K. Singh, and K. Sinha, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 059; 01 (2022) 191(A).
  46. J. Halverson, C. Long, B. Nelson, and G. Salinas, Phys. Rev. D 100, 106010 (2019).
  47. V. M. Mehta, M. Demirtas, C. Long, D. J. E. Marsh, L. Mcallister, and M. J. Stott, arXiv:2011.08693.
  48. V. M. Mehta, M. Demirtas, C. Long, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, and M. J. Stott, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2021) 033.
  49. M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 092.
  50. M. Montero, A. M. Uranga, and I. Valenzuela, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 032.
  51. R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 52, 912 (1995).
  52. T. Banks, M. Dine, P. J. Fox, and E. Gorbatov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2003) 001.
  53. N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 060.
  54. D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035003 (2023).
  55. F. Baume and E. Palti, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 043.
  56. D. Klaewer and E. Palti, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 088.
  57. R. Blumenhagen, I. Valenzuela, and F. Wolf, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 145.
  58. M. Scalisi and I. Valenzuela, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 160.
  59. D. Shlivko and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138826 (2024).
  60. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 012.
  61. R. Calderon et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2024) 048.
  62. M. W. Toomey, M. M. Ivanov, and E. McDonough, arXiv:2409.09029.
  63. D. Jimenez Rezende and S. Mohamed, arXiv:1505.05770.
  64. G. Efstathiou and S. Gratton, arXiv:1910.00483.
  65. E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton, and G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 4620 (2022).
  66. J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein, and A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 039.
  67. D. Scolnic et al., arXiv:2112.03863.
  68. D. Brout et al., Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022).
  69. D. Rubin et al., arXiv:2311.12098.
  70. T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, L14 (2024).
  71. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2021) 057.
  72. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 034.
  73. R. M. Neal, arXiv:math/0502099.
  74. A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, Stat. Sci. 7, 457 (1992).
  75. A. Lewis, arXiv:1910.13970.
  76. A. Paszke et al., arXiv:1912.01703.
  77. C. Durkan, A. Bekasov, I. Murray, and G. Papamakarios, nflows: Normalizing flows in pytorch, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.4296287 (2020).
  78. G. Payeur, E. McDonough, and R. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 111, 123541 (2025).
  79. W. J. Wolf, C. García-García, D. J. Bartlett, and P. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083528 (2024).
  80. O. F. Ramadan, J. Sakstein, and D. Rubin, Phys. Rev. D 110, L041303 (2024).
  81. Y. Akrami, G. Alestas, and S. Nesseris, arXiv:2504.04226.
  82. G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 538, 875 (2025).
  83. L. Huang, R.-G. Cai, and S.-J. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 100413 (2025).
  84. M. Vincenzi et al. (DES Collaboration), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 2585 (2025).
  85. I. D. Gialamas, G. Hütsi, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, M. Vasar, and H. Veermäe, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043540 (2025).
  86. A. Notari, M. Redi, and A. Tesi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 048.
  87. D. Wang and D. Mota, arXiv:2504.15222.
  88. S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee, arXiv:2504.16868.
  89. E. M. Teixeira, W. Giarè, N. B. Hogg, T. Montandon, A. Poudou, and V. Poulin, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023515 (2025).
  90. H. Chaudhary, S. Capozziello, V. K. Sharma, I. Gómez-Vargas, and G. Mustafa, arXiv:2508.10514.
  91. S. L. Guedezounme, B. R. Dinda, and R. Maartens, arXiv:2507.18274.
  92. M. Cortês and A. R. Liddle, arXiv:2504.15336.
  93. G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu, and A. Silvestri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 181002 (2025).
  94. A. Chakraborty, T. Ray, S. Das, A. Banerjee, and V. Ganesan, arXiv:2403.14247.
  95. D. Wang, arXiv:2404.06796.
  96. W. Giarè, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 251003 (2024).
  97. T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, S.-J. Jin, H.-L. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Astrophys. J. 976, 1 (2024).
  98. A. Aboubrahim and P. Nath, arXiv:2411.11177.
  99. J. Pan and G. Ye, arXiv:2503.19898.
  100. Y. Cai, X. Ren, T. Qiu, M. Li, and X. Zhang, arXiv:2505.24732.
  101. W. J. Wolf, P. G. Ferreira, and C. García-García, Phys. Rev. D 111, L041303 (2025).
  102. G. Ye, arXiv:2411.11743.
  103. Y. Tiwari, U. Upadhyay, and R. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043530 (2025).
  104. A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, S. Das, and K. Dutta, arXiv:2503.10806.
  105. W. J. Wolf, C. García-García, T. Anton, and P. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081001 (2025).
  106. A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu, arXiv:2507.03090.
  107. P. Brax, arXiv:2507.16723.
  108. T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, P.-J. Wu, S.-J. Jin, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, arXiv:2501.07361.
  109. M. A. Sabogal, E. Silva, R. C. Nunes, S. Kumar, and E. Di Valentino, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043531 (2025).
  110. M. Tsedrik et al., arXiv:2502.03390.
  111. Y. Zhai, M. de Cesare, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, and E. Wilson-Ewing, arXiv:2503.15659.
  112. R. Shah, P. Mukherjee, and S. Pal, arXiv:2503.21652.
  113. E. Silva, M. A. Sabogal, M. Scherer, R. C. Nunes, E. Di Valentino, and S. Kumar, Phys. Rev. D 111, 123511 (2025).
  114. S. Pan, S. Paul, E. N. Saridakis, and W. Yang, arXiv:2504.00994.
  115. M. Yashiki, arXiv:2505.23382.
  116. B. Barman and S. Girmohanta, arXiv:2506.12589.
  117. Y.-H. Li and X. Zhang, arXiv:2506.18477.
  118. J.-Q. Wang, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, arXiv:2508.01759.
  119. V. Petri, V. Marra, and R. von Marttens, arXiv:2508.17955.
  120. M. van der Westhuizen, A. Abebe, and E. Di Valentino, arXiv:2509.04496.
  121. L. Herold and T. Karwal, arXiv:2506.12004.
  122. V. Stimper, D. Liu, A. Campbell, V. Berenz, L. Ryll, B. Schölkopf, and J. M. Hernández-Lobato, J. Open Source Software 8, 5361 (2023).
  123. C. Durkan, A. Bekasov, I. Murray, and G. Papamakarios, arXiv:1906.04032.
  124. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation