- Access by Xinjiang University
Resurrecting vanilla power law inflation with the aid of continuous spontaneous localization in the ACT era
Phys. Rev. D 112, 023543 – Published 23 July, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rytr-blks
Abstract
The vanilla power law inflation is plagued with two severe drawbacks, the one being the issue of graceful exit, and the other being its compatibility with the existing data. There is yet another daunting problem generic to any inflationary model, and not particular to the power law inflation, is the issue of classicalization of the primordial quantum perturbation. This issue is often treated as an isolated problem primarily because decoherence is often invoked to tackle such problems and decoherence, in principle, does not leaves any observational imprints. However, that is not the case if one invokes the collapse models of quantum mechanics to resolve such a problem, because the collapse models do modify the Schrödinger evolution of the quantum system and the modified dynamics is bound to leave imprints. We show that collapsed modified power law inflation can indeed circumvent the issue with observations and can be made compatible with all the current data coming from Planck, ACT, DESI, and Baryon acoustic oscillations while resolving the classicalization issue associated with the quantum primordial fluctuations. Such an inflationary model also produces a more red-tilted tensor spectrum and no running for both the scalar and tensor spectral indices, which can be a litmus test for this model.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (32)
- T. Louis et al. (ACT Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14452.
- E. Calabrese et al. (ACT Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14454.
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
- A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 012.
- A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 021.
- A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. 91B, 99 (1980).
- F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B 659, 703 (2008).
- R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 198.
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP, Keck Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021).
- R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, arXiv:2503.21030.
- A. Berera, S. Brahma, Z. Qiu, R. O. Ramos, and G. S. Rodrigues, arXiv:2504.02655.
- S. Aoki, H. Otsuka, and R. Yanagita, arXiv:2504.01622.
- I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal, arXiv:2504.06002.
- A. Salvio, arXiv:2504.10488.
- F. Lucchin and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. D 32, 1316 (1985).
- C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, Adv. Sci. Lett. 2, 164 (2009).
- C. Kiefer, I. Lohmar, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 1699 (2007).
- C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 7, 455 (1998).
- D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, Classical Quantum Gravity 13, 377 (1996).
- A. Bassi and G. Ghirardi, Phys. Rep. 379, 257 (2003).
- A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471 (2013).
- P. Cañate, P. Pearle, and D. Sudarsky, Phys. Rev. D 87, 104024 (2013).
- J. Martin, V. Vennin, and P. Peter, Phys. Rev. D 86, 103524 (2012).
- S. Das, K. Lochan, S. Sahu, and T. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 88, 085020 (2013); 89, 109902(E) (2014).
- S. Das, S. Sahu, S. Banerjee, and T. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 90, 043503 (2014).
- V. Sahni and L.-M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 62, 103517 (2000).
- M. Alhallak, N. Chamoun, and M. S. Eldaher, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 533 (2023).
- A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D 49, 748 (1994).
- E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, E. D. Stewart, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6410 (1994).
- R. Kallosh and A. Linde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 002.
- R. Kallosh and A. Linde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2022) 017.
- R. Kallosh and A. Linde, arXiv:2505.13646.
