Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

DMRadio-Core: A new approach for GUT-scale axion searches

V. Ankel1,2, C. Bartram3,2, J. Begin4, C. Bell1,2, S. Chaudhuri4, H.-M. Cho3,2, J. Corbin1,2, W. Craddock3, S. Cuadra5 et al.

A. Droster1,2,3, J. Echevers6, E. Engelhardt7, J. T. Fry5, K. D. Irwin1,2,3, A. Keller1,2, R. Kolevatov4, A. Kunder1,2, N. Kurita3, N. Otto4, E. Pariset5, S. Puranam8, P. Quassolo9,10, N. M. Rapidis1,2,*, C. P. Salemi8,7, M. Simanovskaia1,2, J. Singh1,2, P. Stark1,3,2, E. C. van Assendelft1,2, K. van Bibber6,7, K. J. Vetter5, K. Wells1, J. Wiedemann4, L. Winslow5, D. Wright1,2, A. K. Yi3,2, and B. F. Zemenu1,3,2

  • *Contact author: rapidis@stanford.edu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 092004 – Published 5 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rwv6-8hr3

Abstract

Searches for QCD axions with masses in the neV/c2 mass range are strongly motivated by new physics at the grand unified theory (GUT) scale and by well-motivated preinflationary axion symmetry breaking scales. This parameter space is challenging to probe due to the small axion-photon couplings, which typically require large, high-field magnets with substantial stored energy. In this paper, we propose a new experimental geometry based on a narrow-bore, segmented solenoid that optimizes the collection of the axion-induced signal using LC resonators outside the high-field region of the magnet bore. This alternative optimization significantly reduces the required stored magnetic energy while preserving sensitivity, thus enabling a near-term experiment in the 30–200 MHz (120−830  neV/c2) range, with a cost-effective, staged scaling to a GUT-scale experiment in the 100 kHz–30 MHz (0.4−120  neV/c2) range.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  2. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977).
  3. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  4. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  5. J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. 120B, 127 (1983).
  6. L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. 120B, 133 (1983).
  7. M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. 120B, 137 (1983).
  8. M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984).
  9. P. Svrcek and E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2006) 051.
  10. J. P. Conlon, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 078.
  11. B. S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, and P. Kumar, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 105.
  12. M. Cicoli, M. D. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 146.
  13. J. Halverson, C. Long, B. Nelson, and G. Salinas, Phys. Rev. D 100, 106010 (2019).
  14. E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 149B, 351 (1984).
  15. J. N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. D 112, 066003 (2025).
  16. M. B. Wise, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 402 (1981).
  17. G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, and C. Tamarit, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2017) 001.
  18. R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 172.
  19. A. Ernst, A. Ringwald, and C. Tamarit, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 103.
  20. L. Di Luzio, A. Ringwald, and C. Tamarit, Phys. Rev. D 98, 095011 (2018).
  21. A. Ernst et al., Proc. Sci. CORFU2018 (2019) 054.
  22. P. Fileviez Pérez, C. Murgui, and A. D. Plascencia, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 093.
  23. P. Fileviez Pérez, C. Murgui, and A. D. Plascencia, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 091.
  24. P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 141.
  25. B. Cabrera and S. Thomas, Workshop Axions 2010 (University of Florida, Gainesville, 2008).
  26. P. Sikivie, N. Sullivan, and D.  B. Tanner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 131301 (2014).
  27. Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 141801 (2016).
  28. S. Chaudhuri, P. W. Graham, K. Irwin, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 92, 075012 (2015).
  29. C. P. Salemi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081801 (2021).
  30. J. L. Ouellet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 121802 (2019).
  31. N. Crisosto, P. Sikivie, N.  S. Sullivan, D.  B. Tanner, J. Yang, and G. Rybka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 241101 (2020).
  32. A. V. Gramolin, D. Aybas, D. Johnson, J. Adam, and A. O. Sushkov, Nat. Phys. 17, 79 (2021).
  33. A. Phipps et al., in Microwave Cavities and Detectors for Axion Research, edited by G. Carosi and G. Rybka (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020), pp. 139–145.
  34. V. Ankel et al., arXiv:2607.05771.
  35. V. Ankel et al. (to be published).
  36. N. M. Rapidis (DMRadio Collaboration), SciPost Phys. Proc. 12, 036 (2023).
  37. J. N. Benabou, J. W. Foster, Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and C. P. Salemi, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035009 (2023).
  38. http://cal-axion.org.
  39. L. Brouwer et al. (DMRadio Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 103008 (2022).
  40. A. AlShirawi et al. (DMRadio Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 052001 (2025).
  41. M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, Phys. Lett. 104B, 199 (1981).
  42. A. R. Zhitnitsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980).
  43. L. Brouwer et al. (DMRadio Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 112003 (2022).
  44. P. F. de Salas and A. Widmark, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 104901 (2021).
  45. S. Chaudhuri et al., arXiv:1803.01627.
  46. S. E. Kuenstner et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013281 (2025).
  47. V. Ankel et al., J. Appl. Phys. 138, 094505 (2025).
  48. R. Kolevatov, S. Chaudhuri, and L. Page, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 97, 024503 (2026).
  49. K. Altenmüller et al. (CAST Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 221005 (2024).
  50. V. Ankel et al., 10.5281/zenodo.21283056 (2026).
  51. N. Mitchell, D. Bessette, R. Gallix, C. Jong, J. Knaster, P. Libeyre, C. Sborchia, and F. Simon, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 18, 435 (2008).
  52. H. Maeda and Y. Yanagisawa, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 1 (2014).
  53. J. Choi, S. Ahn, B. R. Ko, S. Lee, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1013, 165667 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation