- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Ready-to-fit inhomogeneous cosmological model: The axially symmetric Szekeres spacetime

Marie-Noëlle Célérier*

  • *Contact author: marie-noelle.celerier@obspm.fr
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023510 – Published 6 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rttb-g97q

Abstract

The purpose of the present work is based on two main observations: the tensions encountered by the standard ΛCDM model when confronted to precision small scale cosmological data and the finding that the matter distribution is dipolar and the expansion of the Universe is axially symmetric roughly in the direction of the CMB dipole. Therefore, we propose, as a model for the inhomogeneous local universe, an axially symmetric Szekeres solution. After describing its main properties, we are left with three metric functions to be fitted to data between the observer and the transition to homogeneity which is an intrinsic feature of Szekeres spacetimes. So as to turn a difficult functional inference problem into a classical parameter estimation problem, we propose to use Chebyshev polynomial expansions, which, as a first step, we truncate after the second order terms. We are thus left with nine constant parameters: six for the metric functions, plus the observer’s location and the cosmological constant. Here are the proper ingredients needed to implement the data fitting to the model in the future.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. S. Casertano, G. Anand, R. I. Anderson, R. Beaton et al. (H0DN Collaboration), The local distance network: A community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at ∼1% precision, Astron. Astrophys. 708, A166 (2026).
  2. E. Di Valentino, J. Levi Said, A. Riess, A. Pollo et al. (CosmoVerse Network Collaboration), The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics, Phys. Dark Universe 49, 101965 (2025).
  3. C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
  4. N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays, Living Rev. Relativity 28, 3 (2025).
  5. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 028.
  6. D. Gonzalez et al. (DESI Collaboration), Testing scale-dependent modified gravity with DESI DR1, arXiv:2604.26915.
  7. P. Szekeres, A class of inhomogeneous cosmological models, Commun. Math. Phys. 41, 55 (1975).
  8. M.-N. Célérier, Precision cosmology with exact inhomogeneous solutions of general relativity: The Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123526 (2024).
  9. K. Bolejko and M.-N. Célérier, Szekeres Swiss-cheese model and supernova observations, Phys. Rev. D 82, 103510 (2010).
  10. P. Mishra, M.-N. Célérier, and T. P. Singh, Redshift drift in axially symmetric quasispherical Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 86, 083520 (2012).
  11. P. Mishra, Redshift and redshift drift in Λ=0 quasispherical Szekeres cosmological models and the effect of averaging, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063520 (2022).
  12. M. Hills and A. Heinesen, Cosmography with Λ-Szekeres models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2026) 016.
  13. K. Bolejko, M. Ahsan Nazer, and D. L. Wiltshire, Differential cosmic expansion and the Hubble flow anisotropy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2016) 035.
  14. C. A. P. Bengaly, R. Maartens, and M. G. Santos, Probing the cosmological principle in the counts of radio galaxies at different frequencies, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2018) 031.
  15. A. K. Singal, Peculiar motion of the Solar system derived from a dipole anisotropy in the redshift distribution of distant quasars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, L104 (2019).
  16. A. K. Singal, Large disparity in cosmic reference frames determined from the sky distributions of radio sources and the microwave background radiation, Phys. Rev. D 100, 063501 (2019).
  17. J. Colin, R. Mohayaee, M. Rameez, and S. Sarkar, Evidence for anisotropy of cosmic acceleration, Astron. Astrophys. 631, L13 (2019).
  18. N. J. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee, S. Sarkar, and J. Colin, A test of the cosmological principle with quasars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 908, L51 (2021).
  19. T. M. Siewert, M. Schmidt-Rubart, and D. Schwarz, Cosmic radio dipole: Estimators and frequency dependence, Astron. Astrophys. 653, A9 (2021).
  20. N. J. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee, and S. Sarkar, A challenge to the standard cosmological model, Astrophys. J. Lett. 937, L31 (2022).
  21. P. Tiwari, D. J. Schwarz, G.-B. Zhao, R. Durrer, M. Kunz, and H. Padmanabhan, An independent measure of the kinematic dipole from SDSS, Astrophys. J. 975, 279 (2024).
  22. A. K. Singal, Cosmic dipoles of active galactic nuclei at optical and radio wavelengths display much larger amplitudes than the cosmic microwave background dipole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 532, L1 (2024).
  23. N. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee, and S. Sarkar, Forty years of the Ellis–Baldwin test, Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 68 (2025).
  24. N. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee, and S. Sarkar, Colloquium: The cosmic dipole anomaly, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 041001 (2025).
  25. M. Rameez, Anisotropy in the cosmic acceleration inferred from supernovae, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 383, 20240032 (2025).
  26. J. D. Wagenveld, S. von Hausegger, H.-R. Klöckner, and D. J. Schwarz, The kinematic contribution to the cosmic number count dipole, Astron. Astrophys. 697, A112 (2025).
  27. A. Sah, M. Rameez, S. Sarkar, and C. G. Tsagas, Anisotropy in Pantheon+supernovae, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 596 (2025).
  28. B. Kalbouneh, C. Marinoni, R. Maartens, J. Bel, J. Santiago, C. Clarkson, M. Sarma, and J.-M. Virey, The anisotropic expansion rate of the local Universe and its covariant cosmographic interpretation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 084.
  29. K. Bolejko, A. Krasinski, C. Hellaby, and M.-N. Célérier, Structures in the Universe by Exact Methods: Formation, Evolution, Interactions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  30. J. Plebański and A. Krasiński, An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2024).
  31. C. Hellaby, The null and KS limits of the Szekeres model, Classical Quantum Gravity 13, 2537 (1996).
  32. R. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 6 The outgoing radiation condition, Proc. R. Soc. A 264, 309 (1961).
  33. I. Georg and C. Hellaby, Symmetry and equivalence in Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 95, 124016 (2017).
  34. A. Krasiński and K. Bolejko, Redshift propagation equations in the β′≠0 Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 83, 083503 (2011).
  35. C. Hellaby and A. Krasiński, You cannot get through Szekeres wormholes: Regularity, topology, and causality in quasispherical Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084011 (2002).
  36. R. G. Buckley and E. M. Schlegel, Physical geometry of the quasispherical Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 101, 023511 (2020).
  37. R. A. Sussman and I. Delgado Gaspar, Multiple nonspherical structures from the extrema of Szekeres scalars, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083533 (2015).
  38. A. Krasiński and K. Bolejko, Geometry of the quasihyperbolic Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104036 (2012).
  39. R. Brent Tully, H. M. Courtois, and J. G. Sorce, Cosmicflows—3, Astron. J. 152, 50 (2016).
  40. R. Brent Tully, E. Kourkchi, H. M. Courtois, G. S. Anand et al., Cosmicflows—4, Astrophys. J. 944, 94 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023510– Published 6 July, 2026
  • Received 17 April 2026
  • Accepted 29 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation