- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Searches for nonstandard neutrino oscillations at neutrino telescopes with a TeV muon accelerator source

Nicholas W. Kamp1 and Gray Putnam2

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 033007 – Published 25 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rmh8-yqz7

Abstract

Muon accelerators, a potential technology for enabling O(10  TeV) parton center of mass energy collisions, would also source an intense, collimated beam of neutrinos at TeV energies. The energy and size of this beam would be excellently matched as a source for existing and planned neutrino telescopes: gigaton-sized detectors of astrophysical neutrinos at and above TeV energies. In this paper, we introduce the technical considerations and scientific reach of pairing a muon accelerator source of neutrinos with a neutrino telescope detector, a combination we dub the “Neutrino Kaleidoscope.” In particular, such a pairing would enable searches for non-standard oscillations of the beam neutrinos as they traverse the earth between source and detector. These nonstandard neutrino oscillations could be sourced by Lorentz invariance violation, which a neutrino kaleidoscope could probe up to the Planck scale. Such a search would also have a reach on sterile neutrinos orders of magnitude beyond existing terrestrial limits. Finally, we touch on the nonoscillation physics case for a neutrino kaleidoscope.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (133)

  1. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The IceCube neutrino observatory: Instrumentation and online systems, J. Instrum. 12, P03012 (2017); 19, E05001(E) (2024).
  2. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The design and performance of IceCube DeepCore, Astropart. Phys. 35, 615 (2012).
  3. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), A search for extremely-high-energy neutrinos and first constraints on the ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray proton fraction with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 031001 (2025).
  4. S. Aiello et al. (KM3NeT Collaboration), Observation of an ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT, Nature (London) 638, 376 (2025); 640, E3(E) (2025).
  5. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), eV-Scale sterile neutrino search using eight years of atmospheric muon neutrino data from the IceCube neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 141801 (2020).
  6. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaborations), Search for an eV-scale sterile neutrino using improved high-energy νμ event reconstruction in IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 201804 (2024).
  7. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Search for a Lorentz-violating sidereal signal with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112003 (2010).
  8. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Test of Lorentz invariance with atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 91, 052003 (2015).
  9. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Strong constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions from TeV-Scale νu disappearance at IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 011804 (2022).
  10. D. Stratakis et al. (Muon Collider Collaboration), A muon collider facility for physics discovery, arXiv:2203.08033.
  11. Carlotta Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 864 (2023); 84, 36(E) (2024).
  12. Hind Al Ali et al., The muon Smasher’s guide, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 084201 (2022).
  13. K. M. Black et al., Muon collider forum report, J. Instrum. 19, T02015 (2024).
  14. C. Adolphsen et al., European strategy for particle physics—accelerator R&D roadmap, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 1, 1 (2022).
  15. Ikaros I. Y. Bigi et al., The potential for neutrino physics at muon colliders and dedicated high current muon storage rings, Phys. Rep. 371, 151 (2002).
  16. Carlotta Accettura et al. (International Muon Collider Collaboration), Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2, 176 (2024).
  17. Bruce J. King, Neutrino physics at muon colliders, AIP Conf. Proc. 441, 132 (1998).
  18. Luc Bojorquez-Lopez, Matheus Hostert, Carlos A. Argüelles, and Zhen Liu, The neutrino slice at muon colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 091803 (2025).
  19. André de Gouvêa and Adrian Thompson, Electroweak observables in neutrino-electron scattering from a muon storage ring, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 098.
  20. Peter B. Denton, Julia Gehrlein, and Chui-Fan Kong, Testing new physics in oscillations at a neutrino factory, Nucl. Phys. B1018, 117040 (2025).
  21. Bruce J. King, Potential hazards from neutrino radiation at muon colliders, arXiv:physics/9908017.
  22. Patrick Huber, Submarine neutrino communication, Phys. Lett. B 692, 268 (2010).
  23. Hirotaka Sugawara, Hiroyuki Hagura, and Toshiya Sanami, Destruction of nuclear bombs using ultrahigh-energy neutrino beam, arXiv:hep-ph/0305062.
  24. Adam M. Dziewonski and Don L. Anderson, Preliminary reference earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25, 297 (1981).
  25. Matteo Agostini et al. (P-ONE Collaboration), The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment, Nat. Astron. 4, 913 (2020).
  26. S. Adrian-Martinez et al. (KM3Net Collaboration), Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G 43, 084001 (2016).
  27. A. D. Avrorin et al. (Baikal-GVD Collaboration), Baikal-GVD: Status and prospects, EPJ Web Conf. 191, 01006 (2018).
  28. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration), IceCube-Gen2: The window to the extreme universe, J. Phys. G 48, 060501 (2021).
  29. Z. P. Ye et al. (TRIDENT Collaboration), A multi-cubic-kilometre neutrino telescope in the Western Pacific Ocean, Nat. Astron. 7, 1497 (2023).
  30. Huiming Zhang, Yudong Cui, Yunlei Huang, Sujie Lin, Yihan Liu, Zijian Qiu, Chengyu Shao, Yihan Shi, Caijin Xie, and Lili Yang, A proposed deep sea neutrino observatory in the nanhai, Astropart. Phys. 171, 103123 (2025).
  31. Tian-Qi Huang, Zhen Cao, Mingjun Chen, Jiali Liu, Zike Wang, Xiaohao You, and Ying Qi, Proposal for the high energy neutrino telescope, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 1080.
  32. Babak Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume I Introduction to DUNE, J. Instrum. 15, T08008 (2020).
  33. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), Hyper-Kamiokande design report, arXiv:1805.04163.
  34. H. Nunokawa, O. L. G. Peres, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Probing the LSND mass scale and four neutrino scenarios with a neutrino telescope, Phys. Lett. B 562, 279 (2003).
  35. Sandhya Choubey, Signature of sterile species in atmospheric neutrino data at neutrino telescopes, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 014.
  36. P. S. Bhupal Dev et al., Neutrino non-standard interactions: A status report, arXiv:1907.00991.
  37. Ram Brustein, David Eichler, and Stefano Foffa, Probing the Planck scale with neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 65, 105006 (2002).
  38. V. A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Lorentz and CPT violation in the neutrino sector, Phys. Rev. D 70, 031902(R) (2004).
  39. V. Alan Kostelecky and Matthew Mewes, Lorentz and CPT violation in neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 69, 016005 (2004).
  40. Bei Zhou and John F. Beacom, Dimuons in neutrino telescopes: New predictions and first search in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 105, 093005 (2022).
  41. Giovanni De Lellis, Pasquale Migliozzi, and Pietro Santorelli, Charm physics with neutrinos, Phys. Rep. 399, 227 (2004); 411, 323(E) (2005).
  42. D. Geiregat et al. (CHARM-II Collaboration), First observation of neutrino trident production, Phys. Lett. B 245, 271 (1990).
  43. Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Stefania Gori, Maxim Pospelov, and Itay Yavin, Neutrino trident production: A powerful probe of new physics with neutrino beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091801 (2014).
  44. Kyriacos Skoufaris, Christian Carli, Daniel Schulte, and Pantaleo Raimondi, First design of a 10 TeV centre of mass energy muon collider, JACoW IPAC2023, MOPL064 (2023).
  45. Cari Cesarotti, Samuel Homiller, Rashmish K. Mishra, and Matthew Reece, Probing new gauge forces with a high-energy muon beam dump, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071803 (2023).
  46. Cari Cesarotti and Rikab Gambhir, The new physics case for beam-dump experiments with accelerated muon beams, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 283.
  47. C. Hasnip, DUNE-PRISM—a new method to measure neutrino oscillations, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, Oxford U., 2023.
  48. B. J. Holzer, Introduction to transverse beam dynamics, in CERN Accelerator School: Course on Superconductivity for Accelerators (2013), pp. 27–45, arXiv:1404.0923.

  49. The ORCA detector of the KM3NeT experiment has previously been considered as a far detector option in a low-energy neutrino beamline [50]. Our proposal is quite different in that it benefits from the higher intensities, energies, and collimation of the neutrino flux from a muon collider. A related study of possible baseline experiments considered DUNE as a far detector for an accelerator neutrino source in Tokai [51].

  50. Dinesh Kumar Singha, Monojit Ghosh, Rudra Majhi, and Rukmani Mohanta, Study of light sterile neutrino at the long-baseline experiment options at KM3NeT, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075039 (2023).
  51. Peter B. Denton, Probing CP violation with neutrino disappearance alone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 031801 (2024).
  52. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Methods and stability tests associated with the sterile neutrino search using improved high-energy νμ event reconstruction in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092009 (2024).
  53. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the galactic plane, Science 380, adc9818 (2023).
  54. J. Ahrens et al. (AMANDA Collaboration), Muon track reconstruction and data selection techniques in AMANDA, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 524, 169 (2004).
  55. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), An improved method for measuring muon energy using the truncated mean of dE/dx, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 703, 190 (2013).
  56. R. Abbasi et al., A convolutional neural network based cascade reconstruction for the IceCube neutrino observatory, J. Instrum. 16, P07041 (2021).
  57. Dmitry Chirkin and Wolfgang Rhode, Muon Monte Carlo: A High-precision tool for muon propagation through matter, arXiv:hep-ph/0407075.
  58. L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978).
  59. S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, Resonance amplification of oscillations in matter and spectroscopy of solar neutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913 (1985).
  60. Stephen J. Parke, Nonadiabatic level crossing in resonant neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1275 (1986).
  61. Joachim Kopp, Pedro A. N. Machado, Michele Maltoni, and Thomas Schwetz, Sterile neutrino oscillations: The global picture, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 050.
  62. A. Diaz, C. A. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad, and M. H. Shaevitz, Where are we with light sterile neutrinos?, Phys. Rep. 884, 1 (2020).
  63. Pedro AN Machado, Ornella Palamara, and David W Schmitz, The short-baseline neutrino program at fermilab, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 363 (2019).
  64. K. S. Babu and Gerhart Seidl, Simple model for (3+2) neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B 591, 127 (2004).
  65. James Barry, Werner Rodejohann, and He Zhang, Light sterile neutrinos: Models and phenomenology, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 091.
  66. Yuki Kamo, Satoshi Yajima, Yoji Higasida, Shin-Ichiro Kubota, Shoshi Tokuo, and Jun-Ichi Ichihara, Analytical calculations of four neutrino oscillations in matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 211 (2003).
  67. Thijs van Eeden and Aart Heijboer (KM3NeT Collaboration), Double cascade reconstruction in KM3NeT/ARCA, J. Instrum. 16, C09021 (2021).
  68. P. Adamson et al. (MINOS+ Collaboration), Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+using a two-detector fit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 091803 (2019).
  69. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), A proposal for a three detector short-baseline neutrino oscillation program in the fermilab booster neutrino beam, arXiv:1503.01520.
  70. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Dual-baseline search for active-to-sterile neutrino oscillations in NOvA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081804 (2025).
  71. Amanda Cooper-Sarkar, Philipp Mertsch, and Subir Sarkar, The high energy neutrino cross-section in the standard model and its uncertainty, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 042.
  72. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), The neutrino flux prediction at MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 79, 072002 (2009).
  73. L. Aliaga et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Neutrino flux predictions for the NuMI beam, Phys. Rev. D 94, 092005 (2016); 95, 039903(A) (2017).
  74. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Final search for short-baseline neutrino oscillations with the PROSPECT-I detector at HFIR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 151802 (2025).
  75. F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Search for a sub-eV sterile neutrino using Daya Bay’s full dataset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 051801 (2024).
  76. H. Almazán et al. (STEREO Collaboration), STEREO neutrino spectrum of U235 fission rejects sterile neutrino hypothesis, Nature (London) 613, 257 (2023).
  77. Himal Acharya et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Sterile-neutrino search based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Nature (London) 648, 70 (2025).
  78. Y. J. Ko et al. (NEOS Collaboration), Sterile neutrino search at the NEOS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 121802 (2017).
  79. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Improved short-baseline neutrino oscillation search and energy spectrum measurement with the PROSPECT experiment at HFIR, Phys. Rev. D 103, 032001 (2021).
  80. V. V. Barinov et al., Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment, Phys. Rev. C 105, 065502 (2022).
  81. M. Andriamirado et al., Physics opportunities with PROSPECT-II, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2202.12343.
  82. L. Alvarez-Ruso et al. (NuSTEC Collaboration), NuSTEC White Paper: Status and challenges of neutrino–nucleus scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100, 1 (2018).
  83. C. A. Argüelles, I. Esteban, M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, MicroBooNE and the νe interpretation of the MiniBooNE low-energy excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 241802 (2022).
  84. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First constraints on light sterile neutrino oscillations from combined appearance and disappearance searches with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 011801 (2023).
  85. O. B. Rodrigues, M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, B. Littlejohn, Pedro A. N. Machado, I. Safa, and T. Zhou, Toward a robust confirmation or refutation of the sterile-neutrino explanation of short-baseline anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081801 (2025).
  86. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for light sterile neutrinos with two neutrino beams at MicroBooNE, Nature (London) 648, 64 (2025).
  87. Shirley Weishi Li, Mauricio Bustamante, and John F. Beacom, Echo technique to distinguish flavors of astrophysical neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 151101 (2019).
  88. Jordi Salvado, Olga Mena, Sergio Palomares-Ruiz, and Nuria Rius, Non-standard interactions with high-energy atmospheric neutrinos at IceCube, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 141.
  89. Jordi Salvado, Olga Mena, Sergio Palomares-Ruiz, and Nuria Rius, Non-standard interactions with high-energy atmospheric neutrinos at IceCube, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 141.
  90. Wei Tian, Shuhua Hao, Iwan Morton-Blake, and Donglian Xu, Enhancing neutrino flavour sensitivity in TRIDENT with tau neutrino identification, Proc. Sci. ICRC2025 (2025) 1195.
  91. Sidney R. Coleman and Sheldon L. Glashow, High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance, Phys. Rev. D 59, 116008 (1999).
  92. V. A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Lorentz and CPT violation in neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 69, 016005 (2004).
  93. V. A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Lorentz violation and short-baseline neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 70, 076002 (2004).
  94. S. W. Hawking, The unpredictability of quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 395 (1982).
  95. V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989).
  96. A. Addazi et al., Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103948 (2022).
  97. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Lorentz violating extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998).
  98. V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011).
  99. Maxim Pospelov and Yanwen Shang, On Lorentz violation in Horava-Lifshitz type theories, Phys. Rev. D 85, 105001 (2012).
  100. Shin’ichiro Ando, Marc Kamionkowski, and Irina Mocioiu, Neutrino oscillations, Lorentz/CPT violation, and dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 80, 123522 (2009).
  101. Shao-Feng Ge and Hitoshi Murayama, Apparent CPT violation in neutrino oscillation from dark non-standard interactions, arXiv:1904.02518.
  102. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Search for a Lorentz-violating sidereal signal with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112003 (2010).
  103. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Neutrino interferometry for High-Precision tests of Lorentz symmetry with IceCube, Nat. Phys. 14, 961 (2018).
  104. Barbara Julia Skrzypek, The case of the missing neutrino: Astrophysical messengers of Planck-scale physics, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard U. (main), 2024.
  105. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Search for quantum gravity using astrophysical neutrino flavour with IceCube, Nat. Phys. 18, 1287 (2022).
  106. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, CPT violation and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997).
  107. P. Adamson et al. (MINOS Collaboration), Testing Lorentz invariance and CPT conservation with NuMI neutrinos in the MINOS near detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 151601 (2008).
  108. P. Adamson et al. (MINOS Collaboration), A search for Lorentz invariance and CPT violation with the MINOS far detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151601 (2010).
  109. L. B. Auerbach et al. (LSND Collaboration), Tests of Lorentz violation in anti-nu(mu)—> anti-nu(e) oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 72, 076004 (2005).
  110. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Test of Lorentz and CPT violation with short baseline neutrino oscillation excesses, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1303 (2013).
  111. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Detection of astrophysical tau neutrino candidates in IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1031 (2022).
  112. M. S. Berger and V. A. Kostelecky, Supersymmetry and Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. D 65, 091701(R) (2002).
  113. P. A. Bolokhov, S. Groot Nibbelink, and Maxim Pospelov, Lorentz violating supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 72, 015013 (2005).
  114. S. M. Carroll, J. A. Harvey, V. A. Kostelecky, C. D. Lane, and T. Okamoto, Noncommutative field theory and Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 141601 (2001).
  115. V. A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Neutrinos with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension, Phys. Rev. D 85, 096005 (2012).
  116. Tommy Ohlsson, Status of non-standard neutrino interactions, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 044201 (2013).
  117. Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, Neutrino oscillations and non-standard interactions, Front. Phys. 6, 10 (2018).
  118. André de Gouvêa and Kevin J. Kelly, Non-standard neutrino interactions at DUNE, Nucl. Phys. B908, 318 (2016).
  119. K. S. Babu, P. S. Bhupal Dev, Sudip Jana, and Anil Thapa, Non-standard interactions in radiative neutrino mass models, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 006.
  120. A. Zee, A theory of lepton number violation, neutrino Majorana mass, and oscillation, Phys. Lett. 93B, 389 (1980); 95B, 461(E) (1980).
  121. Sacha Davidson and Martin Gorbahn, Charged lepton flavor change and nonstandard neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015010 (2020).
  122. Yasaman Farzan and Ian M. Shoemaker, Lepton flavor violating non-standard interactions via light mediators, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 033.
  123. K. S. Babu, A. Friedland, P. A. N. Machado, and I. Mocioiu, Flavor gauge models below the Fermi scale, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 096.
  124. Peter B. Denton, Yasaman Farzan, and Ian M. Shoemaker, Testing large non-standard neutrino interactions with arbitrary mediator mass after COHERENT data, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 037.
  125. Yasaman Farzan and Mariam Tortola, Neutrino oscillations and non-standard interactions, Front. Phys. 6, 10 (2018).
  126. Philip L. R. Weigel, Janet M. Conrad, and Alfonso Garcia-Soto, Cross sections and inelasticity distributions of high-energy neutrino deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043044 (2025).
  127. Bei Zhou and John F. Beacom, Neutrino-nucleus cross sections for W-boson and trident production, Phys. Rev. D 101, 036011 (2020).
  128. Bei Zhou and John F. Beacom, W-boson and trident production in TeV–PeV neutrino observatories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 036010 (2020).
  129. Juan M. Cruz-Martinez, Max Fieg, Tommaso Giani, Peter Krack, Toni Mäkelä, Tanjona R. Rabemananjara, and Juan Rojo, The LHC as a neutrino-ion collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 369 (2024).
  130. Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Stefania Gori, Maxim Pospelov, and Itay Yavin, Neutrino trident production: A powerful probe of new physics with neutrino beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091801 (2014).
  131. http://iaifi.org/.
  132. http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan.
  133. https://github.com/nickkamp1/NuTelescopeMuCollider.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 033007– Published 25 August, 2026
  • Received 2 September 2025
  • Accepted 21 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation