Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Properties of black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics

Lewis Croney1,*, Ruth Gregory1,2,†, Ansh Gupta1,‡, and Carlos J. Ramírez-Valdez3,§

  • *Contact author: lewis.croney@kcl.ac.uk
  • Contact author: ruth.gregory@kcl.ac.uk
  • Contact author: ansh.gupta@kcl.ac.uk
  • §Contact author: jonathan.ramirez@tec.mx

Phys. Rev. D 114, 044048 – Published 17 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qmjh-dzz8

Abstract

We investigate the properties of charged black hole geometries in nonlinear electrodynamics. We focus on the recently reported analytic charged black hole solutions to illustrate the consequences of a nonmonotonic lapse function that exists for a wide range of black hole solutions. The spacetime admits stable light-rings, static near-horizon observers, and trapped near horizon photon orbits. We also show that although these modifications near the horizon are screened from afar, they nonetheless lead to additional branches of quasinormal modes for the black hole that are longer lived than the canonical Einstein branches.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. M. Born and L. Infeld, Proc. R. Soc. A 144, 425 (1934).
  2. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  3. S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, Proc. R. Soc. A 314, 529 (1970).
  4. D. L. Wiltshire, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2445 (1988).
  5. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. 163B, 123 (1985).
  6. R. G. Leigh, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 04, 2767 (1989).
  7. J. Jing and S. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 686, 68 (2010).
  8. R.-G. Cai, D.-W. Pang, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124034 (2004).
  9. J. M. Bardeen, in Proceedings of GR5, Tbilisi (Tbilisi State University Press, Tbilisi, 1968), p. 174.
  10. E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5056 (1998).
  11. E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Phys. Lett. B 464, 25 (1999).
  12. K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 63, 044005 (2001).
  13. Y. Verbin, B. Pulice, A. Övgün, and H. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084061 (2025).
  14. S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008).
  15. D. Kastor, S. Ray, and J. Traschen, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 195011 (2009).
  16. S. Gunasekaran, R. B. Mann, and D. Kubiznak, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 110.
  17. D. Kubizňák, R. B. Mann, and M. Teo, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 063001 (2017).
  18. G. W. Gibbons and K.-i. Maeda, Nucl. Phys. B298, 741 (1988).
  19. S. A. Hartnoll, P. K. Kovtun, M. Muller, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 76, 144502 (2007).
  20. S. Fernando and D. Krug, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 35, 129 (2003).
  21. H. Yajima and T. Tamaki, Phys. Rev. D 63, 064007 (2001).
  22. S. I. Kruglov, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 528, 588 (2016).
  23. S. H. Hendi, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 333, 282 (2013).
  24. L. Croney, R. Gregory, and C. J. Ramírez-Valdez, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 013.
  25. C.-H. Wang, Y.-P. Zhang, T. Zhu, and S.-W. Wei, arXiv:2508.20558.
  26. G. Boillat, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 941 (1970).
  27. M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and R. Klippert, Phys. Rev. D 61, 045001 (2000).
  28. V. A. De Lorenci, R. Klippert, M. Novello, and J. M. Salim, Phys. Lett. B 482, 134 (2000).
  29. E. Goulart de Oliveira Costa and S. Esteban Perez Bergliaffa, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 135015 (2009).
  30. Y. N. Obukhov and G. F. Rubilar, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024042 (2002).
  31. A. Övgün and R. C. Pantig, arXiv:2512.18727.
  32. G. A. Marks, S. J. Staelens, T. Evstafyeva, and U. Sperhake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 131402 (2025).
  33. D. S. Fonseca, C. F. B. Macedo, M. M. Corrêa, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, arXiv:2512.22267.
  34. S. Murk and I. Soranidis, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044064 (2024).
  35. M. A. A. de Paula, H. C. D. Lima Junior, P. V. P. Cunha, and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084029 (2023).
  36. J. Tang, Y. Liu, W.-L. Qian, and R. Yue, Chin. Phys. C 47, 025105 (2023).
  37. S. Yuan, C. Luo, C. Luo, Z. Hu, Z. Zhang, and B. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 49, 025103 (2025).
  38. A. A. Araújo Filho, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 454 (2025).
  39. M. Alloqulov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, and C. Yuan, arXiv:2512.12672.
  40. M. Fathi, A. Guzmán, and J. R. Villanueva, arXiv:2512.02714.
  41. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009).
  42. A. Jansen, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 546 (2017).
  43. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793 (2011).
  44. S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, arXiv:2504.05014.
  45. K. Nomura and D. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044006 (2022).
  46. R. C. Pantig, L. Mastrototaro, G. Lambiase, and A. Övgün, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1155 (2022).
  47. F. Aliyan and K. Nozari, Phys. Dark Universe 46, 101611 (2024).
  48. S. Zare, L. M. Nieto, X.-H. Feng, S.-H. Dong, and H. Hassanabadi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 041.
  49. J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 191.
  50. J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, arXiv:2601.07789.
  51. E. Babichev, V. Mukhanov, and A. Vikman, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 101.
  52. It is worth noting that the expression for the RN null orbit radius (21) is well defined for m<p<3m/22, even though the RN geometry loses its horizon for p>m.

  53. Note that even though G=0 in the background, G will not vanish for a general electromagnetic perturbation.

  54. J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2001).
  55. G. O. Schellstede, V. Perlick, and C. Lämmerzahl, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 528, 738 (2016).
  56. V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044069 (2014).
  57. P. V. P. Cunha, E. Berti, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251102 (2017).
  58. P. V. P. Cunha, arXiv:2503.00117.
  59. W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44S10, 1 (1966); 48, 463(E) (1967).
  60. C. Vlachos, E. Papantonopoulos, and K. Destounis, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044042 (2021).
  61. R. Dong and D. Stojkovic, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024058 (2021).
  62. V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084031 (2016).
  63. P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, F. Goelen, T. Hertog, and B. Vercnocke, Phys. Rev. D 97, 024040 (2018).
  64. M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Zhidenko, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2021) 010.
  65. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140108 (2026).
  66. H.-P. Nollert, Phys. Rev. D 53, 4397 (1996).
  67. J. L. Jaramillo, R. Panosso Macedo, and L. Al Sheikh, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031003 (2021).
  68. M. H.-Y. Cheung, K. Destounis, R. P. Macedo, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111103 (2022).
  69. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, M. H.-Y. Cheung, F. Di Filippo, F. Duque, P. Martens, and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084011 (2022).
  70. S. Basu, R. Pollack, and M.-F. Roy, Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry, Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics 2nd ed., Vol. 10 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation