Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Shedding light on dark-energy evolution

Víctor H. Cárdenas*

  • Instituto de Física y Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Avenida Gran bretana 1111, Valparaíso, Chile

  • *Contact author: victor.cardenas@uv.cl

Phys. Rev. D 114, 083525 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qghs-bfc3

Abstract

We further develop and systematically test a minimally assumption-dependent inversion framework for reconstructing the dark-energy density evolution from type Ia supernova distance-redshift measurements. Instead of adopting a parametric form for the equation of state or employing kernel-based smoothing, we derive an explicit inversion that expresses the normalized dark-energy density, X(z)≡ρDE(z)/ρDE(0), directly in terms of the redshift derivative of the supernova distance modulus. We apply the method to the Pantheon+compilation, restricting to z>0.01, and estimate the required derivative using a dynamic redshift-binning scheme with approximately equal occupancy per bin. To assess robustness, we compare a local central finite-difference estimator with covariance-based error propagation to an independent Savitzky-Golay local-polynomial reconstruction, finding qualitatively consistent trends, though with estimator-dependent differences in amplitude, for the binnings studied. The reconstructed X(z) is broadly compatible with the Λ cold dark matter expectation X≃1 over the low- and intermediate-redshift range, with a moderate enhancement near z≈0.03–0.06 and a clear, increasingly noisy rise above unity for z≳0.4. We further show that increasing the number of bins systematically increases both the amplitude and the propagated uncertainty of the reconstructed values, an effect we trace to the quadratic amplification of derivative noise inherent to the inversion [X(z)∝D(z)−2]; among the binnings studied, coarser binning yields the more stable reconstruction. Our results demonstrate that direct inversion provides a transparent, data-driven consistency test for dark-energy evolution—including an explicit diagnostic of its own noise-amplification limitations—that can be straightforwardly extended to forthcoming high-precision distance measurements.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 021.
  2. J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins, and I. Waga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2077 (1995).
  3. A. G. Riess et al. (Supernova Search Team), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
  4. S. Perlmutter et al. (Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
  5. Y. Wang and G. Lovelace, Astrophys. J. Lett. 562, L115 (2001).
  6. Y. Wang, K. Freese, P. Gondolo, and M. Lewis, Astrophys. J. 594, 25 (2003).
  7. E. Di Valentino et al. (CosmoVerse Network Collaboration), Phys. Dark Universe 49, 101965 (2025).
  8. D. Huterer and G. Starkman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 031301 (2003).
  9. A. Shafieloo, U. Alam, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobinsky, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 366, 1081 (2006).
  10. T. Holsclaw, U. Alam, B. Sansó, H. Lee, K. Heitmann, S. Habib, and D. Higdon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 241302 (2010).
  11. M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213 (2001).
  12. E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003).
  13. H. K. Jassal, J. S. Bagla, and T. Padmanabhan, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, L11 (2005).
  14. A. A. Mamon and S. Das, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 495 (2017).
  15. S. del Campo, I. Duran, R. Herrera, and D. Pavon, Phys. Rev. D 86, 083509 (2012).
  16. L.-I. Xu, C.-W. Zhang, B.-R. Chang, and H.-Y. Liu, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 1939 (2008).
  17. Y. Wang and P. M. Garnavich, Astrophys. J. 552, 445 (2001).
  18. V. H. Cardenas, Phys. Lett. B 750, 128 (2015).
  19. M. Seikel, C. Clarkson, and M. Smith, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2012) 036.
  20. V. C. Busti, C. Clarkson, and M. Seikel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, L11 (2014).
  21. A. Shafieloo, A. G. Kim, and E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. D 85, 123530 (2012).
  22. C. Bogdanos and S. Nesseris, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2009) 006.
  23. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 77, 023504 (2008).
  24. S. Nesseris and J. García-Bellido, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2012) 033.
  25. J. Blanco, V. H. Cárdenas, and C. Campuzano, arXiv:2510.12881.
  26. D. W. Hogg, arXiv:astro-ph/9905116.
  27. D. Scolnic et al., Astrophys. J. 938, 113 (2022).
  28. D. Brout et al., Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022).
  29. H. A. Sturges, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 21, 65 (1926).
  30. A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Anal. Chem. 36, 1627 (1964).
  31. D. Grandon and V. H. Cardenas, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 145008 (2021).
  32. R. C. Bernardo, D. Grandón, J. Said Levi, and V. H. Cárdenas, Phys. Dark Universe 36, 101017 (2022).
  33. R. C. Bernardo, D. Grandón, J. Levi Said, and V. H. Cárdenas, Phys. Dark Universe 40, 101213 (2023).
  34. L. Orchard and V. H. Cárdenas, Phys. Dark Universe 46, 101678 (2024).
  35. M. Malekjani, R. M. Conville, E. Ó. Colgáin, S. Pourojaghi, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 317 (2024).
  36. J.-X. Li and S. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1308 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation