- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Black hole binaries in shift-symmetric Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Maxence Corman1,*, Llibert Aresté Saló2,3,4,†, and Katy Clough5,‡

  • *Contact author: maxence.corman@aei.mpg.de
  • †Contact author: llibert.areste@uib.cat
  • ‡Contact author: k.clough@qmul.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 104041 – Published 12 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p4mp-66xv

Abstract

In shift-symmetric Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, stationary black holes have a nonvanishing scalar charge. During the inspiral, the phase evolution is modified by several effects, primarily an additional scalar dipole radiation, which enters at −1PN order. Including corrections up to 2PN, this effect accelerates the inspiral when compared to general relativity, but changes in the conservative dynamics may do the opposite. Using fully nonlinear numerical simulations of quasicircular, comparable mass binaries, we characterize the late stages of the orbital dynamics. We find that the overall effect is still an accelerated merger phase for the modified gravity case, but noticeably less than predicted by Post-Newtonian (PN) alone, which we relate to the conservative dynamics, showing that at the late inspiral stage more energy must be emitted in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity to induce a given change in frequency. In longer signals, this may lead to a distinctive frequency evolution relative to general relativity as the binary approaches merger, but its effect close to merger is to suppress the difference with GR. This work suggests we may need to revisit existing constraints on the theory that are obtained assuming PN approximations apply up to merger, or based on order by order approximations that neglect backreaction effects on the metric, and shows the importance of including nonlinear effects that modify the gravitational sector in the strong field regime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (105)

  1. K. G. Arun et al. (LISA Collaboration), New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA, Living Rev. Relativity 25, 4 (2022).
  2. G. Gnocchi, A. Maselli, T. Abdelsalhin, N. Giacobbo, and M. Mapelli, Bounding alternative theories of gravity with multiband GW observations, Phys. Rev. D 100, 064024 (2019).
  3. L. Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: A roadmap, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 143001 (2019).
  4. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Open data from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA through the first part of the fourth observing run, Astrophys. J. 1004, 232 (2026).
  5. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Directional search for persistent gravitational waves: Results from the first part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 114, 022001 (2026).
  6. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  7. M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  8. M. Maggiore et al. (ET Collaboration), Science case for the Einstein Telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 050.
  9. D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019).
  10. T. Baker, D. Psaltis, and C. Skordis, Linking tests of gravity on all scales: From the strong-field regime to cosmology, Astrophys. J. 802, 63 (2015).
  11. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019).
  12. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021); 112, 049902(E) (2025).
  13. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021).
  14. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025).
  15. LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, Black hole spectroscopy and tests of general relativity with GW250114, arXiv:2509.08099.
  16. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s area law and the Kerr nature of black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 (2025).
  17. C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 081702 (2017).
  18. C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, and J. Zhang, Causality constraints on gravitational effective field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 131102 (2022).
  19. M. Carrillo González, C. de Rham, V. Pozsgay, and A. J. Tolley, Causal effective field theories, Phys. Rev. D 106, 105018 (2022).
  20. M. Carrillo González, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly, V. Pozsgay, and A. Tokareva, Positivity-causality competition: A road to ultimate EFT consistency constraints, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 146.
  21. S. Weinberg, Effective field theory for inflation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123541 (2008).
  22. P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley, Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5049 (1996).
  23. T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 251102 (2014).
  24. T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity: An explicit example, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124063 (2014).
  25. Z. Lyu, N. Jiang, and K. Yagi, Constraints on Einstein-dilation-Gauss-Bonnet gravity from black hole-neutron star gravitational wave events, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064001 (2022); 106, 069901(E) (2022).
  26. F.-L. Julié, L. Pompili, and A. Buonanno, Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity within the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024016 (2025).
  27. E. M. Sänger et al., Tests of general relativity with GW230529: A neutron star merging with a lower mass-gap compact object, Phys. Rev. D 113, 084070 (2026).
  28. H. S. Reall and C. M. Warnick, Effective field theory and classical equations of motion, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 63, 042901 (2022).
  29. Á. D. Kovács and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of scalar-tensor effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 221101 (2020).
  30. Á. D. Kovács and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124003 (2020).
  31. W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Evolution of Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity using a modified Harmonic formulation, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044040 (2021).
  32. L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well-posedness of the four-derivative scalar-tensor theory of gravity in singularity avoiding coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261104 (2022).
  33. L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Puncture gauge formulation for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and four-derivative scalar-tensor theories in d+1 spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084018 (2023).
  34. H. L. H. Shum, L. Aresté Saló, F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, Well-posed BSSN-type formulation for scalar-tensor theories of gravity with second-order field equations, Phys. Rev. D 113, 104001 (2026).
  35. W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Dynamics of spontaneous black hole scalarization and mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 101102 (2021).
  36. W. E. East and F. Pretorius, Binary neutron star mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104055 (2022).
  37. M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024014 (2023).
  38. D. D. Doneva, L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Testing the limits of scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity through nonlinear evolutions of spin-induced scalarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084017 (2023).
  39. M. Corman and W. E. East, Black hole-neutron star mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084065 (2024).
  40. D. D. Doneva, L. Aresté Saló, and S. S. Yazadjiev, 3+1 nonlinear evolution of Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024040 (2024).
  41. L. Aresté Saló, D. D. Doneva, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Challenges in the nonlinear evolution of unequal mass binaries in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084022 (2025).
  42. L. Capuano, L. Aresté Saló, D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazadjiev, and E. Barausse, Dynamical hair growth in black hole binaries in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 113, 124038 (2026).
  43. L. Aresté Saló, R. Aguilera-Miret, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, From mergers to collapse: Scalarisation dynamics in neutron star binaries, arXiv:2602.10755.
  44. S. Swain, T. Jain, and L. Aresté Saló, Black-hole scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet: Numerical relativity meets analytics, arXiv:2605.04224.
  45. M. Corman, L. Lehner, W. E. East, and G. Dideron, Nonlinear studies of modifications to general relativity: Comparing different approaches, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084048 (2024).
  46. M. Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084046 (2020).
  47. M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, M. A. Scheel, and D. A. Hemberger, Numerical binary black hole mergers in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: Scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044020 (2017).
  48. H. O. Silva, H. Witek, M. Elley, and N. Yunes, Dynamical descalarization in binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 031101 (2021).
  49. M. Elley, H. O. Silva, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, Spin-induced dynamical scalarization, descalarization, and stealthness in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity during a black hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044018 (2022).
  50. D. D. Doneva, A. Vañó-Viñuales, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Dynamical descalarization with a jump during a black hole merger, Phys. Rev. D 106, L061502 (2022).
  51. T. Evstafyeva, M. Agathos, and J. L. Ripley, Measuring the ringdown scalar polarization of gravitational waves in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124010 (2023).
  52. M. Bezares, L. ter Haar, M. Crisostomi, E. Barausse, and C. Palenzuela, Kinetic screening in nonlinear stellar oscillations and gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044022 (2021).
  53. R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. França, and L. Lehner, Self-consistent modeling of gravitational theories beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111403 (2023).
  54. R. Cayuso and L. Lehner, Nonlinear, noniterative treatment of EFT-motivated gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084008 (2020).
  55. R. Cayuso, Gravitational collapse in quadratic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124066 (2023).
  56. N. Franchini, M. Bezares, E. Barausse, and L. Lehner, Fixing the dynamical evolution in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064061 (2022).
  57. A. H. K. R, J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Where and why does Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory break down?, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044044 (2023).
  58. S. E. Brady, L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., Solving the initial conditions problem for modified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104022 (2023).
  59. P. J. Nee, G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, and N. L. Vu, Quasistationary hair for binary black hole initial data in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024061 (2025).
  60. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  61. J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Scalarized black hole dynamics in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 044015 (2020).
  62. J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Gravitational collapse in Einstein dilaton-Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 134001 (2019).
  63. F.-L. Julié, H. O. Silva, E. Berti, and N. Yunes, Black hole sensitivities in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124031 (2022).
  64. K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, and N. Yunes, Challenging the presence of scalar charge and dipolar radiation in binary pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024010 (2016).
  65. K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka, Post-Newtonian, quasi-circular binary inspirals in quadratic modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064022 (2012); 93, 029902(E) (2016).
  66. L. Aresté Saló, S. E. Brady, K. Clough, D. Doneva, T. Evstafyeva, P. Figueras, T. França, L. Rossi, and S. Yao, grfolres: A code for modified gravity simulations in strong gravity, J. Open Source Software 9, 6369 (2024).
  67. T. Andrade et al., grchombo: An adaptable numerical relativity code for fundamental physics, J. Open Source Software 6, 3703 (2021).
  68. M. Radia, U. Sperhake, A. Drew, K. Clough, P. Figueras, E. A. Lim, J. L. Ripley, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, T. França, and T. Helfer, Lessons for adaptive mesh refinement in numerical relativity, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 135006 (2022).
  69. M. Ansorg, B. Brügmann, and W. Tichy, A single-domain spectral method for black hole puncture data, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064011 (2004).
  70. V. Paschalidis, Z. B. Etienne, R. Gold, and S. L. Shapiro, An efficient spectral interpolation routine for the twopunctures code, arXiv:1304.0457.
  71. standalone twopunctures, https://github.com/JLRipley314/Standalone-TwoPunctures-C-Cpp.
  72. M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104016 (2020).
  73. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Properties of the binary black hole merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).
  74. A. Buonanno, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mroue, H. P. Pfeiffer, and A. Taracchini, Reducing orbital eccentricity of precessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 83, 104034 (2011).
  75. S. Habib, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Eccentricity reduction for quasicircular binary evolutions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084059 (2025).
  76. L. Lehner and O. M. Moreschi, Dealing with delicate issues in waveforms calculations, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124040 (2007).
  77. C. Reisswig and D. Pollney, Notes on the integration of numerical relativity waveforms, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 195015 (2011).
  78. D. Christodoulou, Reversible and irreversible transformations in black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1596 (1970).
  79. N. Sennett, S. Marsat, and A. Buonanno, Gravitational waveforms in scalar-tensor gravity at 2PN relative order, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084003 (2016).
  80. F.-L. Julié and E. Berti, Post-Newtonian dynamics and black hole thermodynamics in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104061 (2019).
  81. D. M. Eardley, Observable effects of a scalar gravitational field in a binary pulsar, Astrophys. J. 196, L59 (1975).
  82. D. Sun and L. C. Stein, Parameter matching between horizon quasi-local and point-particle definitions at 1PN for quasi-circular and non spinning BBH systems in harmonic gauge, arXiv:2510.25618.
  83. J. Bamber, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, Black hole merger simulations in wave dark matter environments, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024035 (2023).
  84. J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, J. Bamber, and P. G. Ferreira, Effect of wave dark matter on equal mass black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211401 (2024).
  85. J. C. Aurrekoetxea, J. Marsden, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, Self-interacting scalar dark matter around binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083011 (2024).
  86. L. Machet and L. Aresté Saló, Scalar fields from nonlinear sigma models on black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084047 (2025).
  87. S. Roy, R. Vicente, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, Scalar fields around black hole binaries in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 191402 (2026).
  88. C.-H. Cheng, G. Ficarra, and H. Witek, Dephasing in binary black hole mergers surrounded by scalar wave dark matter clouds, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024063 (2026).
  89. G. Lara et al., Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, arXiv:2505.14785.
  90. G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. A. Wittek, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, A. Carpenter, G. Lovelace, M. A. Scheel, and W. Throwe, Scalarization of isolated black holes in scalar Gauss-Bonnet theory in the fixing-the-equations approach, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024033 (2024).
  91. G. Lara et al., Towards long and accurate numerical relativity waveforms of binary black holes beyond general relativity, arXiv:2607.27991.
  92. G. Lara et al., High-accuracy drivers to simulate black hole binaries beyond general relativity with the fixing-the-equations approach, arXiv:2607.28003.
  93. P. Figueras, A. Held, and Á. D. Kovács, Well-posed initial value formulation of general effective field theories of gravity, arXiv:2407.08775.
  94. P. Figueras, Á. D. Kovács, and S. Yao, Stable non-linear evolution in regularised higher derivative effective field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 150.
  95. www.grtlcollaboration.org.
  96. www.dirac.ac.uk.
  97. A. Taracchini, Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, E. Barausse, M. Boyle, T. Chu, G. Lovelace, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 86, 024011 (2012).
  98. L. Lindblom and B. Szilagyi, An improved gauge driver for the GH Einstein system, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084019 (2009).
  99. M. W. Choptuik and F. Pretorius, Ultra relativistic particle collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 111101 (2010).
  100. H. O. Kreiss and J. Oliger, Comparison of accurate methods for the integration of hyperbolic equations, Tellus 24, 199 (1972).
  101. F. Pretorius, Numerical relativity using a generalized harmonic decomposition, Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 425 (2005).
  102. M. J. Berger and J. Oliger, Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 53, 484 (1984).
  103. F. Pretorius and M. W. Choptuik, Adaptive mesh refinement for coupled elliptic-hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys. 218, 246 (2006).
  104. F. Pretorius, B. Stephens, and M. W. Choptuik, pamr, http://laplace.physics.ubc.ca/Group/Software.html.
  105. M. Adams et al., chombo software package for AMR applications—design document, LBNL Report No. LBNL-6616E, 2015.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 104041– Published 12 November, 2026
  • Received 10 December 2025
  • Accepted 30 September 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by the Max Planck Society.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation