- Open Access
- Access by Xinjiang University
Physics potential of the IceCube Upgrade for atmospheric neutrino oscillations
Phys. Rev. D 113, 072009 – Published 15 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nnjw-jp1n
Abstract
The IceCube Upgrade is an extension of the existing IceCube Neutrino Observatory and will be deployed in the 2025–2026 austral summer. It will significantly improve the sensitivity of the detector to atmospheric neutrino oscillations. The existing 86-string IceCube array contains a dense in-fill known as DeepCore which is optimized to measure neutrinos with energies down to a few GeV. The IceCube Upgrade will consist of seven new densely instrumented strings placed within the DeepCore volume to further enhance the performance in the GeV energy range. The additional strings will feature new optical modules, each containing multiple photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), in contrast to the existing modules that each contain a single PMT. This will more than triple the number of PMT channels with respect to the current IceCube configuration, allowing for improved detection efficiency and reconstruction performance at GeV energies. We describe necessary updates to simulation, event selection, and reconstruction to accommodate the higher data rates observed by the upgraded detector and the addition of multi-PMT modules. We determine the expected sensitivity of the IceCube Upgrade to the atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters and , the appearance of tau neutrinos and the neutrino mass ordering. The IceCube Upgrade will provide neutrino oscillation measurements that are of similar precision to those from accelerator experiments, while providing complementarity by probing higher energies and longer baselines, and with different sources of systematic uncertainties.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (64)
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Measurement of atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters using convolutional neural networks with 9.3 years of data in IceCube DeepCore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 091801 (2025).
- T. Wester et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with neutron tagging and an expanded fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I–V, Phys. Rev. D 109, 072014 (2024).
- B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1957).
- Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
- M. Blennow, P. Coloma, P. Huber, and T. Schwetz, Quantifying the sensitivity of oscillation experiments to the neutrino mass ordering, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 028.
- M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: Instrumentation and online systems, J. Instrum. 12, P03012 (2017).
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The design and performance of IceCube DeepCore, Astropart. Phys. 35, 615 (2012).
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Measurement of atmospheric neutrino mixing with improved IceCube deepcore calibration and data processing, Phys. Rev. D 108, 012014 (2023).
- M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube-PINGU Collaboration), Letter of intent: The Precision IceCube Next Generation Upgrade (PINGU), arXiv:1401.2046.
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), D-Egg: A dual PMT optical module for IceCube, J. Instrum. 18, P04014 (2023).
- L. Classen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), A multi-PMT optical module for the IceCube Upgrade, Proc. Sci. ICRC2019 (2020) 855 [arXiv:1908.10802].
- T. Anderson et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Design and performance of the multi-PMT optical module for IceCube Upgrade, Proc. Sci. ICRC2021 (2021) 1070 [arXiv:2107.11383].
- S. Mechbal and N. Feigl (IceCube Collaboration), Characterization and testing of the IceCube Upgrade mDOM, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 1183.
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Acceptance tests of more than 10 000 photomultiplier tubes for the multi-PMT digital optical modules of the IceCube Upgrade, J. Instrum. 19, P07038 (2024).
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The LED calibration systems for the mDOM and D-Egg sensor modules of the IceCube Upgrade, J. Instrum. 20, P11026 (2025).
- W. Kang, J. Lee, S. Rodan, C. Rott, and C. Tönnis, The camera system for the IceCube Upgrade, Phys. Sci. Forum 8, 49 (2023).
- B. Bastian-Querner et al., The wavelength-shifting optical module, Sensors 22, 1385 (2022).
- S. Griffin et al. (IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration), Electronics design of the IceCube-Gen2 optical module prototype, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 1039 [arXiv:2308.02771].
- Y. Makino et al. (IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration), Mechanical design of the optical modules intended for IceCube-Gen2, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 979 [arXiv:2308.09786].
- F. Henningsen et al., A self-monitoring precision calibration light source for large-volume neutrino telescopes, J. Instrum. 15, P07031 (2020).
- N. Khera and F. Henningsen (IceCube Collaboration), POCAM in the IceCube Upgrade, Proc. Sci. ICRC2021 (2021) 1049 [arXiv:2108.05298].
- M. Rongen and D. Chirkin on behalf of IceCube, Advances in IceCube ice modelling & what to expect from the upgrade, J. Instrum. 16, C09014 (2021).
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The acoustic module for the IceCube Upgrade, Proc. Sci. ICRC2021 (2021) 1059 [arXiv:2108.05631].
- R. Anthony, A. Ringler, M. DuVernois, K. Anderson, and D. Wilson, Six decades of seismology at South Pole, Antarctica: Current limitations and future opportunities to facilitate new geophysical observations, Seismol. Res. Lett. 92 (2021).
- IceCube Collaboration, IceCube Upgrade neutrino Monte Carlo simulation, 10.21234/qfz1-yh02 (2020).
- C. Andreopoulos et al., The genie neutrino Monte Carlo generator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
- C. Andreopoulos et al., The genie neutrino Monte Carlo generator: Physics and user manual, arXiv:1510.05494.
- M. Honda, M. Sajjad Athar, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara, and S. Midorikawa, Atmospheric neutrino flux calculation using the NRLMSISE-00 atmospheric model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023004 (2015).
- Y. Becherini, A. Margiotta, M. Sioli, and M. Spurio, A parameterisation of single and multiple muons in the deep water or ice, Astropart. Phys. 25, 1 (2006).
- D. Heck, J. Knapp, J. N. Capdevielle, G. Schatz, and T. Thouw, corsika: A Monte Carlo code to simulate extensive air showers, Technical Report No. FZKA-6019, 1998.
- K. Leonard DeHolton, Measuring the atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters with IceCube DeepCore, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 2022.
- J. H. Koehne, K. Frantzen, M. Schmitz, T. Fuchs, W. Rhode, D. Chirkin, and J. Becker Tjus, proposal: A tool for propagation of charged leptons, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 2070 (2013).
- S. Agostinelli et al. (Geant4 Collaboration), geant4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- D. Chirkin et al., Photon propagation using GPUs by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, in Proceedings of the 2019 15th International Conference on eScience (IEEE, 2019), p. 388.
- R. Abbasi et al., In situ estimation of ice crystal properties at the South Pole using LED calibration data from the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, Cryosphere 18, 75 (2024).
- P. Eller et al. (IceCube Collaboration), A model independent parametrization of the optical properties of the refrozen IceCube drill holes, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 1034 [arXiv:2307.15298].
- M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Energy reconstruction methods in the IceCube neutrino telescope, J. Instrum. 9, P03009 (2014).
- B. Khemani, S. Patil, K. Kotecha, and S. Tanwar, A review of graph neural networks: Concepts, architectures, techniques, challenges, datasets, applications, and future directions, J. Big Data 11, 18 (2024).
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Graph neural networks for low-energy event classification & reconstruction in IceCube, J. Instrum. 17, P11003 (2022).
- A. Søgaard et al., GraphNeT: Graph neural networks for neutrino telescope event reconstruction, J. Open Source Software 8, 4971 (2023).
- P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
- I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 178.
- J. Prado González, Event selection for the IceCube Upgrade, Master’s thesis, University of Copenhagen, 2023.
- R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Low energy event reconstruction in IceCube DeepCore, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 807 (2022).
- G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); G. Cowan et al.73, 2501(E) (2013).
- G. D. Barr, S. Robbins, T. K. Gaisser, and T. Stanev, Uncertainties in atmospheric neutrino fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 74, 094009 (2006).
- A. Fedynitch, F. Riehn, R. Engel, T. K. Gaisser, and T. Stanev, Hadronic interaction model sibyll 2.3c and inclusive lepton fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103018 (2019).
- A. Cooper-Sarkar, P. Mertsch, and S. Sarkar, The high energy neutrino cross-section in the standard model and its uncertainty, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 042.
- J. Conrad, A, de Gouvêa, S. Shalgar, and J. Spitz, Atmospheric tau neutrinos in a multi-kiloton liquid argon detector, Phys. Rev. D 82, 093012 (2010).
- M. Tzanov et al., Precise measurement of neutrino and antineutrino differential cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 74, 012008 (2006).
- A. Bodek and U. K. Yang, Modeling deep inelastic cross-sections in the few GeV region, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 112, 70 (2002).
- L. Fischer, R. Naab, and A. Trettin, Treating detector systematics via a likelihood free inference method, J. Instrum. 18, P10019 (2023).
- A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson, Preliminary reference earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 25, 297 (1981).
- K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Results from the T2K experiment on neutrino mixing including a new far detector -like sample, arXiv:2506.05889.
- S. Abubakar et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with 10 years of data from the NOvA experiment, arXiv:2509.04361.
- P. Adamson et al. (MINOS+ Collaboration), Precision constraints for three-flavor neutrino oscillations from the full MINOS dataset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 131802 (2020).
- S. Aiello et al. (KM3NeT Collaboration), Measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with the first six detection units of KM3NeT/ORCA, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 206; 10 (2025) 041(E).
- IceCube Collaboration, Replication data for: Physics potential of the IceCube Upgrade for atmospheric neutrino oscillations, 2025, 10.7910/DVN/OSPLDG.
- M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Measurement of atmospheric tau neutrino appearance with IceCube DeepCore, Phys. Rev. D 99, 032007 (2019).
- T. Kozynets, P. Eller, A. Zander, M. Ettengruber, and D. J. Koskinen, Constraints on non-unitary neutrino mixing in light of atmospheric and reactor neutrino data, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 130.
- J.-Q. Jiang, W. Giarè, S. Gariazzo, M. G. Dainotti, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi, Neutrino cosmology after DESI: Tightest mass upper limits, preference for the normal ordering, and tension with terrestrial observations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 153.
- M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Development of an analysis to probe the neutrino mass ordering with atmospheric neutrinos using three years of IceCube DeepCore data, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 9 (2020).
- F. An et al. (JUNO Collaboration), Neutrino physics with JUNO, J. Phys. G 43, 030401 (2016).
- M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube-Gen2 and JUNO Collaborations), Combined sensitivity to the neutrino mass ordering with JUNO, the IceCube Upgrade, and PINGU, Phys. Rev. D 101, 032006 (2020).