Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Searching for a charged Higgs boson in top-quark decays via the WZ mode

Saiyad Ashanujjaman1,2,*, Andreas Crivellin3,4,†, Siddharth P. Maharathy5,6,7,‡, and Bruce Mellado5,6,§

  • *Contact author: saiyad.ashanujjaman@kit.edu
  • Contact author: andreas.crivellin@icrea.cat
  • Contact author: siddharth.prasad.maharathy@cern.ch
  • §Contact author: bmellado@mail.cern.ch

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115048 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n2g2-gld5

Abstract

Top-quark decays are sensitive probes of light charged Higgs bosons (H±) due to the sizable tt¯ production cross section at the LHC in conjunction with their distinct experimental signatures. While dedicated ATLAS and CMS searches considered only H± decays into τν, cs, or cb for mH±<mt, the WZ channel remains unexplored, despite being the dominant mode in SU(2)L triplet models. Since top-quark pair production with tH±b and H±WZ gives rise to tt¯Z-like signatures, we recast existing tt¯Z analyses to search for signs of charged Higgs bosons and set novel limits on the product of branching fractions Br(tH±b)×Br(H±WZ). These constraints turn out to be at the sub-permille level, despite the observed 2σ preference for a nonzero value. Interpreted within the hypercharge Y=0 Higgs triplet model, this translates into a stringent constraint on the triplet Higgs vacuum expectation value of vΔ2GeV, which is stronger than those from the cs,τν modes and even surpasses electroweak precision constraints from the ρ parameter. Moreover, the 2σ preference for a nonzero cross section further strengthens the cumulative case for a 152GeV boson as suggested, in particular, by diphoton excesses.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (97)

  1. P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964).
  2. F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964).
  3. P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964).
  4. G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964).
  5. P. W. Higgs, Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons, Phys. Rev. 145, 1156 (1966).
  6. T. W. B. Kibble, Symmetry breaking in non-Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. 155, 1554 (1967).
  7. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  8. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  9. J. M. Langford (ATLAS and CMS Collaborations), Combination of Higgs measurements from ATLAS and CMS: Couplings and k-framework, Proc. Sci. LHCP2020 (2021) 136.
  10. , Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay at s=13TeV using up to 140fb1 of data collected by the ATLAS Experiment, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2025-006, 2025.
  11. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. 161B, 136 (1985).
  12. M. Pietroni, The electroweak phase transition in a nonminimal supersymmetric model, Nucl. Phys. B402, 27 (1993).
  13. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3637 (1994).
  14. T. D. Lee, A theory of spontaneous T violation, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1226 (1973).
  15. P. Fayet, Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino, Nucl. Phys. B90, 104 (1975).
  16. P. Fayet, Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions, Phys. Lett. 69B, 489 (1977).
  17. H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rep. 117, 75 (1985).
  18. J. E. Kim, Light pseudoscalars, particle physics and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 150, 1 (1987).
  19. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  20. N. Turok and J. Zadrozny, Electroweak baryogenesis in the two doublet model, Nucl. Phys. B358, 471 (1991).
  21. D. A. Ross and M. J. G. Veltman, Neutral currents and the Higgs mechanism, Nucl. Phys. B95, 135 (1975).
  22. W. Konetschny and W. Kummer, Nonconservation of total lepton number with scalar bosons, Phys. Lett. 70B, 433 (1977).
  23. T. P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino masses, mixings and oscillations in SU(2)×U(1) models of electroweak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2860 (1980).
  24. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, Proton lifetime and fermion masses in an SO(10) model, Nucl. Phys. B181, 287 (1981).
  25. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)×U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  26. M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy, Phys. Lett. 94B, 61 (1980).
  27. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 23, 165 (1981).
  28. J. F. Gunion, R. Vega, and J. Wudka, Higgs triplets in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1673 (1990).
  29. T. G. Rizzo, Updated bounds on Higgs triplet vacuum expectation values and the tree level rho parameter from radiative corrections, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 1961 (1991).
  30. P. Chardonnet, P. Fayet, and P. Salati, Heavy triplet neutrinos as a new dark matter option, Nucl. Phys. B394, 35 (1993).
  31. T. Blank and W. Hollik, Precision observables in SU(2)×U(1) models with an additional Higgs triplet, Nucl. Phys. B514, 113 (1998).
  32. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, Phys. Rep. 1116, 184 (2025).
  33. G. Liu (CMS Collaboration), Searches for additional Higgs bosons at CMS, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2024 (2025) 052.
  34. Y. Horii (ATLAS Collaboration), Searches for singly- and doubly-charged Higgs bosons in ATLAS, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2024 (2025) 070.
  35. T. G. Rizzo, Top quark decay in models with Higgs triplets, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1504 (1990).
  36. J. A. Coarasa Perez, J. Guasch, J. Sola, and W. Hollik, Top quark decay into charged Higgs boson in a general two Higgs doublet model: Implications for the Tevatron data, Phys. Lett. B 442, 326 (1998).
  37. S. Bejar, J. Guasch, and J. Sola, Loop induced flavor changing neutral decays of the top quark in a general two Higgs doublet model, Nucl. Phys. B600, 21 (2001).
  38. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a light charged Higgs boson in the H±cs channel in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 072001 (2020).
  39. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a light charged Higgs boson in tH±b decays, with H±cs, in pp collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 153 (2025).
  40. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a light charged Higgs boson in tH±b decays, with H±cb, in the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 004.
  41. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for charged Higgs bosons in the H±τ±ντ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 142.
  42. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in top-quark decays or in association with top quarks and decaying via H±τ±ντ in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 111, 072006 (2025).
  43. A. Crivellin and S. Iguro, Accumulating hints for flavor-violating Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015014 (2024).
  44. G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and S. Iguro, Searching for di-Higgs signatures of light charged scalars, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 016.
  45. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Collaborations, and LEP Higgs Working Group, Search for charged Higgs bosons: Preliminary combined results using LEP data collected at energies up to 209 GeV, in 2001 Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0107031.
  46. H. Georgi and M. Machacek, Doubly charged Higgs bosons, Nucl. Phys. B262, 463 (1985).
  47. M. S. Chanowitz and M. Golden, Higgs boson triplets with MW=MZcosθW, Phys. Lett. 165B, 105 (1985).
  48. K.-m. Cheung, R. J. N. Phillips, and A. Pilaftsis, Signatures of Higgs triplet representations at TeV e+e colliders, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4731 (1995).
  49. K. Cheung and D. K. Ghosh, Triplet Higgs boson at hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2002) 048.
  50. E. Asakawa and S. Kanemura, The H±WZ0 vertex and single charged Higgs boson production via WZ fusion at the large hadron collider, Phys. Lett. B 626, 111 (2005).
  51. J. L. Diaz Cruz and D. A. Lopez Falcon, Testing models with nonminimal Higgs sector through the decay tq+WZ, Phys. Rev. D 61, 051701 (2000).
  52. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Inclusive and differential cross-section measurements of tt¯Z production in pp collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, including EFT and spin-correlation interpretations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 163.
  53. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for top quark production in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 177.
  54. A. Crivellin, Y. Fang, O. Fischer, S. Bhattacharya, M. Kumar, E. Malwa, B. Mellado, N. Rapheeha, X. Ruan, and Q. Sha, Accumulating evidence for the associated production of a new Higgs boson at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115031 (2023).
  55. S. Bhattacharya, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S.-E. Dahbi, Y. Fang, M. Kumar, and B. Mellado, Growing excesses of new scalars at the electroweak scale, arXiv:2306.17209.
  56. S. Bhattacharya, B. Lieberman, M. Kumar, A. Crivellin, Y. Fang, R. Mazini, and B. Mellado, Emerging excess consistent with a narrow resonance at 152 GeV in high-energy proton-proton collisions, arXiv:2503.16245.
  57. S. von Buddenbrock, N. Chakrabarty, A. S. Cornell, D. Kar, M. Kumar, T. Mandal, B. Mellado, B. Mukhopadhyaya, R. G. Reed, and X. Ruan, Phenomenological signatures of additional scalar bosons at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 580 (2016).
  58. S. von Buddenbrock, A. S. Cornell, A. Fadol, M. Kumar, B. Mellado, and X. Ruan, Multi-lepton signatures of additional scalar bosons beyond the standard model at the LHC, J. Phys. G 45, 115003 (2018).
  59. S. Buddenbrock, A. S. Cornell, Y. Fang, A. Fadol Mohammed, M. Kumar, B. Mellado, and K. G. Tomiwa, The emergence of multi-lepton anomalies at the LHC and their compatibility with new physics at the EW scale, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 157.
  60. S. von Buddenbrock, R. Ruiz, and B. Mellado, Anatomy of inclusive tt¯W production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135964 (2020).
  61. G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S. Bhattacharya, and B. Mellado, Searching for low-mass resonances decaying into W bosons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035026 (2023).
  62. S. Ashanujjaman, S. Banik, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S. P. Maharathy, and B. Mellado, Explaining the γγ+X excesses at 151.5GeV via the Drell-Yan production of a Higgs triplet, Phys. Lett. B 862, 139298 (2025).
  63. A. Crivellin, S. Ashanujjaman, S. Banik, G. Coloretti, S. P. Maharathy, and B. Mellado, Growing evidence for a Higgs triplet, Chin. Phys. C 49, 053107 (2025).
  64. S. Ashanujjaman, S. Banik, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S. P. Maharathy, and B. Mellado, Anatomy of the real Higgs triplet model, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 003.
  65. S. Banik, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and B. Mellado, Uncovering new Higgses in the LHC analyses of differential tt¯ cross sections, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 155.
  66. G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and B. Mellado, Combined explanation of LHC multilepton, diphoton, and top-quark excesses, Phys. Rev. D 110, 073001 (2024).
  67. M. Czakon and A. Mitov, top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2930 (2014).
  68. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  69. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 185; 11 (2021) 085(E).
  70. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017).
  71. S. Frixione, B. Fuks, V. Hirschi, K. Mawatari, H.-S. Shao, P. A. Sunder, and M. Zaro, Automated simulations beyond the standard model: Supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 008.
  72. C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of pythia 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  73. J. Bellm et al., herwig7.0/herwig++ 3.0 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 196 (2016).
  74. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to pythia 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  75. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 155 (2016).
  76. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  77. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, fastjet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  78. H. Bahl, R. Kumar, and G. Weiglein, Impact of interference effects on Higgs-boson searches in the di-top final state at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 098.
  79. P. Fileviez Perez, H. H. Patel, and A. D. Plascencia, On the W mass and new Higgs bosons, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137371 (2022).
  80. T. G. Rizzo, Kinetic mixing, dark Higgs triplets, and MW, Phys. Rev. D 106, 035024 (2022).
  81. J.-W. Wang, X.-J. Bi, P.-F. Yin, and Z.-H. Yu, Electroweak dark matter model accounting for the CDF W-mass anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055001 (2022).
  82. Y. Cheng, X.-G. He, F. Huang, J. Sun, and Z.-P. Xing, Electroweak precision tests for triplet scalars, Nucl. Phys. B989, 116118 (2023).
  83. H. Song, X. Wan, and J.-H. Yu, Custodial symmetry violation in scalar extensions of the standard model, Chin. Phys. C 47, 103103 (2023).
  84. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376, 170 (2022).
  85. J. de Blas, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, A. Goncalves, S. Mishima, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, Global analysis of electroweak data in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 033003 (2022).
  86. E. Bagnaschi, J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You, SMEFT analysis of mW, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 308.
  87. M. Chabab, M. C. Peyranère, and L. Rahili, Probing the Higgs sector of Y=0 Higgs triplet model at LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 873 (2018).
  88. J. Butterworth, H. Debnath, P. Fileviez Perez, and F. Mitchell, Custodial symmetry breaking and Higgs boson signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095014 (2024).
  89. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  90. S.-Y. Ma, X.-D. Huang, X.-C. Zheng, and X.-G. Wu, Precise determination of the bottom-quark on-shell mass using its four-loop relation to the MS¯-scheme running mass, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 101201 (2024).
  91. J. Aparisi et al., mb at mH: The running bottom quark mass and the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 122001 (2022).
  92. A. Czarnecki and S. Davidson, QCD corrections to the charged Higgs decay of a heavy quark, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4183 (1993).
  93. A. Czarnecki and K. Melnikov, Two loop QCD corrections to top quark width, Nucl. Phys. B544, 520 (1999).
  94. K. G. Chetyrkin, R. Harlander, T. Seidensticker, and M. Steinhauser, Second order QCD corrections to Γ(t¯Wb). Phys. Rev. D 60, 114015 (1999).
  95. L.-B. Chen, H. T. Li, J. Wang, and Y. Wang, Analytic result for the top-quark width at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054003 (2023).
  96. S. Amoroso et al. (LHC-TeV MW Working Group), Compatibility and combination of world W-boson mass measurements, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 451 (2024).
  97. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric partners of τ leptons in the final state with two hadronically decaying τ leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D 108, 012011 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation