Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Chaos in QFT

Nadav Shrayer* and Jacob Sonnenschein

  • The Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • *Contact author: nadavshraier@tauex.tau.ac.il
  • Contact author: cobi@tauex.tau.ac.il

Phys. Rev. D 113, 105021 – Published 26 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n1nn-v3ny

Abstract

In this paper we explore the chaotic behavior of nonintegrable quantum field theories and compare them to integrable ones. We choose as prototypes the double sine-Gordon and the sine-Gordon models. We analyze their discrete spectrum determined by a truncation method. We examine the map of the corresponding energy eigenvalues to the eigenvalues of the random matrix theory Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE). This is done by computing the following properties: (a) The distribution of the adjacent spacings and their ratios, (b) higher order spacings and ratios, (c) pair correlations, (d) spectral form factors, and (e) spectral rigidity. For these properties we determine the differences between the integrable and nonintegrable theories and verify that the former admits a Poisson behavior and the latter GOE (apart from the spectral rigidity, which shows mixed behavior).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. G. P. Brandino, R. M. Konik, and G. Mussardo, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P07013.
  2. M. Srdinsek, T. Prosen, and S. Sotiriadis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 121602 (2021).
  3. L. V. Delacrétaz, A. L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, and M. T. Walters, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 045.
  4. J. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 118.
  5. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 151.
  6. A. Avdoshkin, A. Dymarsky, and M. Smolkin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 066.
  7. V. Balasubramanian, R. N. Das, J. Erdmenger, and Z.-Y. Xian, J. Stat. Mech. (2025) 033202.
  8. D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 048.
  9. V. Rosenhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 031601 (2022).
  10. M. Bianchi, M. Firrotta, J. Sonnenschein, and D. Weissman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261601 (2022).
  11. M. Bianchi, M. Firrotta, J. Sonnenschein, and D. Weissman, arXiv:2303.17233.
  12. M. Bianchi, M. Firrotta, J. Sonnenschein, and D. Weissman, arXiv:2403.00713.
  13. S. Negro, F. K. Popov, and J. Sonnenschein, Phys. Rev. D 108, 105024 (2023).
  14. E. P. Wigner, On the Statistical Distribution of the Widths and Spacings of Nuclear Resonance Levels (1957).
  15. F. J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 157 (1962).
  16. O. Bohigas, M. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984).
  17. M. Berry and M. Tabor, Proc. R. Soc. A 356, 375 (1977).
  18. T. Brody, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7, 482 (1973).
  19. T. Brody, J. Flores, J. French, P. Mello, A. Pandey, and S. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981).
  20. F. Izrailev, Phys. Rep. 196, 299 (1990).
  21. B. Chirikov, F. Izrailev, and D. Shepelyansky, Physica (Amsterdam) 33D, 77 (1988).
  22. V. Oganesyan and D. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155111 (2007).
  23. Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 084101 (2013).
  24. Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, E. Vivo, and P. Vivo, J. Phys. A 46, 355204 (2013).
  25. P. Martinez-Azcona, R. Shir, and A. Chenu, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165108 (2025).
  26. D. Fox and P. Kahn, Phys. Rev. 134 (1964).
  27. D. Engel, J. Main, and G. Wunner, J. Phys. A 31 (1998).
  28. A. Abul-Magd and M. Simbel, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5371 (1999).
  29. W. Rao, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054202 (2020).
  30. S. H. Tekur, U. Bhosale, and M. Santhanam, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104305 (2018).
  31. T. Guhr, A. Müller–Groeling, and H. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rep. 299, 189 (1998).
  32. H. Montgomery, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 24, 189 (1973).
  33. A. M. Odlyzko, Math. Comput. 48, 273 (1987).
  34. H.-J. Stöckmann and M. Gutzwiller, Am. J. Phys. 68, 777 (2000).
  35. L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  36. F. Haake, S. Gnutzmann, and M. Kuś, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  37. S. Das, S. K. Garg, C. Krishnan, and A. Kundu, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 172.
  38. F. Haake, S. Gnutzmann, and M. Kuś, Random Matrices and the Statistical Theory of Energy Levels (Academic Press, New York, 1967).
  39. M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. A 400, 229 (1985).
  40. G. Casati, B. V. Chirikov, and I. Guarneri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1350 (1985).
  41. A. M. García-García and J. J. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. D 94, 126010 (2016).
  42. H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, and M. Tezuka, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 124.
  43. L. Delacrétaz, A. L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, and M. Walters, SciPost Phys. 12, 119 (2022).
  44. P. Persson and S. Aberg, Phys. Rev. E 52, 148 (1995).
  45. M. Serbyn and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. B 93, 041424 (2016).
  46. P. Braun, D. Waltner, M. Akila, B. Gutkin, and T. Guhr, Phys. Rev. E 101, 052201 (2020).
  47. P. Sierant, D. Delande, and J. Zakrzewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 186601 (2020).
  48. A. Bhattacharya, A. Jana, and J.Sonnenschein (2026) (to be published).
  49. V. Rosenhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 021601 (2021).
  50. V. Yurov and A. Zamolodchikov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5, 3221 (1989).
  51. N. Anand, A. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, Z. Khandker, M. Walters, and Y. Xin, arXiv:2005.13544.
  52. A. Belin, J. de Boer, D. Jafferis, P. Nayak, and J. Sonner, arXiv:2308.03829.
  53. P. Goddard and D. Olive, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 01, 02 (1986).
  54. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B75, 461 (1974).
  55. Y. Frishman and J. Sonnenschein, Phys. Rep. 223, 309 (1993).
  56. J. Polchinski, arXiv:1505.08108.
  57. J. Polchinski, Phys. Rep. 223, 309 (2015).
  58. G. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6189 (1997).
  59. Y. Chen, J. Maldacena, and E. Witten, arXiv:2109.08563.
  60. M. Srdinšek, T. Prosen, and S. Sotiriadis (2020), 10.5281/zenodo.4319672.
  61. V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05, 3221 (1990).
  62. M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025005 (2015).
  63. R. M. Konik and Y. Adamov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 147205 (2007).
  64. F. S. Cataliotti, S. Burger, C. Fort, P. Maddaloni, F. Minardi, A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, and M. Inguscio, Science 293 (2001).
  65. R. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1982).
  66. S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088 (1975).
  67. G. Delfino and G. Mussardo, Nucl. Phys. B516, 675 (1998).
  68. Z. Bajnok, L. Palla, G. Takacs, and F. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B601, 503 (2001).
  69. L. Erdos and H.-T. Yau, arXiv:1106.4986.
  70. L. Reichl, The Transition to Chaos: Conservative Classical Systems and Quantum Manifestations (Springer, New York, 2004).
  71. I. Dumitriu and A. Edelman, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 5830 (2002).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation