- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Ringdown and tide: Fingerprints of dark matter halo profiles

Arkadip Bhowmik1,*, Avijit Chowdhury2,†, and Sayan Chakrabarti1,‡

  • *Contact author: b.arkadip@iitg.ac.in
  • †Contact author: avijit.chowdhury@iiap.res.in
  • ‡Contact author: sayan.chakrabarti@iitg.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 084070 – Published 22 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mvys-wjf4

Abstract

Astrophysical black holes (BHs) are not isolated, but embedded in matter supplied by their host galaxies. We study how the shape of a surrounding dark matter halo modifies the ringdown and tidal response of an asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric BH. The halo is modeled as an anisotropic Einstein cluster with vanishing radial pressure and a generalized (α,β,γ) density profile, supplemented by an inner cutoff near the BH and, where required, an outer tidal truncation. We derive the axial gravitational perturbation equation and compute the quasinormal mode (QNM) spectrum using sixth-order Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) methods and time-domain evolutions. The halo redshifts both the oscillation frequency and the damping rate, by an amount set not only by the halo compactness but also by the profile parameters: the inner logarithmic slope γ dominates for centrally concentrated halos, while α and β give subleading but profile-dependent corrections. In the eikonal limit, the shift is governed by a single redshift integral encoding the halo mass distribution outside the light ring, explaining the close correspondence between the QNM frequencies, the light ring frequency, and the Lyapunov exponent. We also show that different combinations of compactness and profile shape can yield nearly degenerate ringdown spectra. Time-domain evolutions confirm the WKB frequencies and display the expected late-time Price-law decay, with an intermediate tail controlled by the outer density falloff for slowly decaying profiles. Finally, we compute the static axial tidal Love number and show that it probes the halo with a radial weighting different from the ringdown sector. The combined ringdown and tidal response therefore provides a possible way to distinguish environmental effects from genuine deviations of the vacuum BH geometry.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (123)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. E. Berti et al., Black hole spectroscopy: From theory to experiment, Classical Quantum Gravity 43, 123001 (2026).
  3. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
  4. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
  5. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  6. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, Astrophys. J. Lett. 1004 (2026) L22.
  7. LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, GWTC-5.0: Constraints on the cosmic expansion rate and modified gravitational-wave propagation, arXiv:2605.27227.
  8. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-5.0: Methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients,
  9. C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of gravitational radiation by a Schwarzschild black-hole, Nature (London) 227, 936 (1970).
  10. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009).
  11. C. V. Vishveshwara, Stability of the Schwarzschild metric, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2870 (1970).
  12. W. H. Press, Long wave trains of gravitational waves from a vibrating black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 170, L105 (1971).
  13. S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983).
  14. K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Relativity 2, 2 (1999).
  15. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793 (2011).
  16. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  17. V. Baibhav, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, LISA parameter estimation and source localization with higher harmonics of the ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 101, 084053 (2020).
  18. L. Piro et al., Chasing super-massive black hole merging events with Athena and LISA, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 2577 (2023).
  19. P. A. Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), Astrophysics with the laser interferometer space antenna, Living Rev. Relativity 26, 2 (2023).
  20. S. Deng, S. Babak, and S. Marsat, Fast detection and reconstruction of merging massive black hole binary signals, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043010 (2025).
  21. E. Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 243001 (2015).
  22. V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact objects: A status report, Living Rev. Relativity 22, 4 (2019).
  23. E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104059 (2014).
  24. A. M. Ghez et al., Measuring distance and properties of the milky way’s central supermassive black hole with stellar orbits, Astrophys. J. 689, 1044 (2008).
  25. S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, S. Trippe, T. Alexander, R. Genzel, F. Martins, and T. Ott, Monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the galactic center, Astrophys. J. 692, 1075 (2009).
  26. M. Miyoshi, J. Moran, J. Herrnstein, L. Greenhill, N. Nakai, P. Diamond, and M. Inoue, Evidence for a black hole from high rotation velocities in a sub-parsec region of NGC4258, Nature (London) 373, 127 (1995).
  27. J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 511 (2013).
  28. L. Ferrarese and D. Merritt, A fundamental relation between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 539, L9 (2000).
  29. K. Gebhardt et al., A relationship between nuclear black hole mass and galaxy velocity dispersion, Astrophys. J. Lett. 539, L13 (2000).
  30. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, The structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996).
  31. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997).
  32. P. Salucci, The distribution of dark matter in galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 2 (2019).
  33. A. Chowdhury, G. Sen, S. Chakrabarti, and S. Das, Effect of generic dark matter halos on the transonic accretion onto galactic black holes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 064041 (2025).
  34. A. Chowdhury, G. Sen, S. Chakrabarti, and S. Das, Dark matter halos and transonic accretion flow, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3177, 012038 (2026).
  35. C. F. B. Macedo, J. a. L. Rosa, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Optical appearance of black holes surrounded by a dark matter halo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 046.
  36. D. S. Fonseca, C. F. B. Macedo, M. Malato Corrêa, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Matter environments around black holes: Geodesics, light rings, and ultracompact configurations, Phys. Rev. D 113, 124039 (2026).
  37. A. L. Miller, Gravitational wave probes of particle dark matter: A review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 35, 2530005 (2026).
  38. F. Dosopoulou and J. Silk, Multimessenger detection of black hole binaries in dark matter spikes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081401 (2025).
  39. G. Bertone, Dark matter, black holes, and gravitational waves, Nucl. Phys. B1003, 116487 (2024).
  40. P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1719 (1999).
  41. L. Sadeghian, F. Ferrer, and C. M. Will, Dark matter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis, Phys. Rev. D 88, 063522 (2013).
  42. O. Y. Gnedin and J. R. Primack, Dark matter profile in the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 061302 (2004).
  43. D. Merritt, M. Milosavljevic, L. Verde, and R. Jimenez, Dark matter spikes and annihilation radiation from the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 191301 (2002).
  44. D. Merritt, Evolution of the dark matter distribution at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 201304 (2004).
  45. P. Ullio, H. Zhao, and M. Kamionkowski, A dark matter spike at the galactic center?, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043504 (2001).
  46. G. Bertone et al., Gravitational wave probes of dark matter: Challenges and opportunities, SciPost Phys. Core 3, 007 (2020).
  47. K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, New probe of dark-matter properties: Gravitational waves from an intermediate-mass black hole embedded in a dark-matter minispike, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 221101 (2013).
  48. R. A. Konoplya, Black holes in galactic centers: Quasinormal ringing, grey-body factors and Unruh temperature, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136734 (2021).
  49. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Solutions of the Einstein equations for a black hole surrounded by a galactic halo, Astrophys. J. 933, 166 (2022).
  50. V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo, and A. Maselli, Gravitational waves from extreme-mass-ratio systems in astrophysical environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 241103 (2022).
  51. E. Figueiredo, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Black holes surrounded by generic dark matter profiles: Appearance and gravitational-wave emission, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104033 (2023).
  52. N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. Maselli, Black holes surrounded by generic matter distributions: Polar perturbations and energy flux, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084068 (2024).
  53. L. Pezzella, K. Destounis, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Quasinormal modes of black holes embedded in halos of matter, Phys. Rev. D 111, 064026 (2025).
  54. A. Einstein, On a stationary system with spherical symmetry consisting of many gravitating masses, Ann. Math. 40, 922 (1939).
  55. A. Geralico, F. Pompi, and R. Ruffini, On Einstein clusters, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 12, 146 (2012).
  56. S. Chakraborty, G. Compère, and L. Machet, Tidal Love numbers and quasinormal modes of the Schwarzschild-Hernquist black hole, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024015 (2025).
  57. S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Black hole normal modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and application of a higher order WKB analysis of potential barrier scattering, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3621 (1987).
  58. B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Black hole normal modes: A semianalytic approach, Astrophys. J. Lett. 291, L33 (1985).
  59. R. A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher order WKB approach, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024018 (2003).
  60. C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. Linearized perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 49, 883 (1994).
  61. V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 79, 064016 (2009).
  62. T. Binnington and E. Poisson, Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084018 (2009).
  63. T. Damour and A. Nagar, Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084035 (2009).
  64. B. Kol and M. Smolkin, Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 010.
  65. S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate, and J. Steinhoff, New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spectroscopy and dynamic tides, arXiv:1304.2228.
  66. N. Gürlebeck, No-hair theorem for black holes in astrophysical environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 151102 (2015).
  67. H. S. Chia, Tidal deformationand dissipation of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024013 (2021).
  68. R. P. Bhatt, S. Chakraborty, and S. Bose, Addressing issues in defining the Love numbers for black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084013 (2023).
  69. A. Le Tiec, M. Casals, and E. Franzin, Tidal Love numbers of Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084021 (2021).
  70. P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, On the vanishing of Love numbers for Kerr black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 038.
  71. S. Chakraborty, P. Heidmann, and P. Pani, Fermionic response of black holes in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 113, L061503 (2026).
  72. S. Chakraborty and P. Pani, Tidal response of compact objects, arXiv:2604.08679.
  73. M. J. Rodríguez, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, Love numbers of black holes and compact objects, arXiv:2604.08653.
  74. A. Chowdhury, C. Singha, K. Bamba, and S. Chakraborty, Tidal deformation of an accreting compact object, arXiv:2607.24938.
  75. V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, and C. J. Moore, Gravitational waves and higher dimensions: Love numbers and Kaluza-Klein excitations, Phys. Rev. D 100, 124037 (2019).
  76. L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2021) 052.
  77. V. De Luca, A. Garoffolo, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, Tidal Love numbers and Green’s functions in black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064081 (2024).
  78. R. P. Bhatt and C. Singha, Scalar tidal response of a rotating BTZ black hole, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 154.
  79. K. Chakravarti, S. Chakraborty, S. Bose, and S. SenGupta, Tidal Love numbers of black holes and neutron stars in the presence of higher dimensions: Implications of GW170817, Phys. Rev. D 99, 024036 (2019).
  80. M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084011 (2023).
  81. V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Senatore, Black holes in an effective field theory extension of general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251105 (2018).
  82. V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084014 (2017).
  83. V. De Luca, J. Khoury, and S. S. C. Wong, Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044066 (2023).
  84. C. Singha and S. Chakraborty, Tidal deformation of black holes in Lovelock gravity, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024005 (2026).
  85. R. Emparan, A. Fernandez-Pique, and R. Luna, Geometric polarization of plasmas and Love numbers of AdS black branes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 150.
  86. S. Nair, S. Chakraborty, and S. Sarkar, Asymptotically de Sitter black holes have nonzero tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064025 (2024).
  87. E. Franzin, A. M. Frassino, and J. V. Rocha, Tidal Love numbers of static black holes in anti-de Sitter, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 224.
  88. M. Silvestrini, E. Maggio, S. Chakraborty, and P. Pani, Tidal deformations of compact objects from the membrane paradigm, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124021 (2025).
  89. S. Chakraborty, E. Maggio, M. Silvestrini, and P. Pani, Dynamical tidal Love numbers of Kerr-like compact objects, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084042 (2024).
  90. S. Nair, S. Chakraborty, and S. Sarkar, Dynamical Love numbers for area quantized black holes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124041 (2023).
  91. P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, A. Maselli, and V. Ferrari, Tidal deformations of a spinning compact object, Phys. Rev. D 92, 024010 (2015).
  92. K. Chakravarti and C. Singha, Tidal Love numbers and quasi-normal modes of the ECO in a dark matter halo, arXiv:2509.03556.
  93. V. Cardoso and F. Duque, Environmental effects in gravitational-wave physics: Tidal deformability of black holes immersed in matter, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064028 (2020).
  94. V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Black holes in galaxies: Environmental impact on gravitational-wave generation and propagation, Phys. Rev. D 105, L061501 (2022).
  95. S. D’Onofrio, S. Datta, and A. Maselli, Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments, arXiv:2605.02633.
  96. Y.-Q. Zhao and P. Pani, Quasinormal modes and tidal responses of black holes in generic anisotropic matter environments, arXiv:2606.11380.
  97. E. Cannizzaro, V. De Luca, and P. Pani, Tidal deformability of black holes surrounded by thin accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123004 (2024).
  98. P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Low-frequency gravitational-wave science with eLISA/NGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 124016 (2012).
  99. A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh, and D. A. Nichols, Measuring the dark matter environments of black hole binaries with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043009 (2022).
  100. F. Duque, C. F. B. Macedo, R. Vicente, and V. Cardoso, Extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 121404 (2024).
  101. Y. Zhao, N. Dai, and Y. Gong, Distinguishing dark matter haloes with extreme mass ratio inspirals, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 543, 2326 (2025).
  102. J. E. Taylor and J. Silk, The clumpiness of cold dark matter: Implications for the annihilation signal, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 339, 505 (2003).
  103. A. Dekel, G. Ishai, A. A. Dutton, and A. V. Maccio, Dark-matter halo profiles of a general cusp/core with analytic velocity and potential, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 1005 (2017).
  104. H. Zhao, Analytical models for galactic nuclei, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 278, 488 (1996).
  105. J. Einasto, The Andromeda galaxy M31. I. A preliminary model, Astrofiz. 5, 137 (1969).
  106. R. Acharyya, P. Banerjee, and S. Kar, Modelling Einstein cluster using einasto profile, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2024) 070.
  107. A. W. Graham, D. Merritt, B. Moore, J. Diemand, and B. Terzic, Empirical models for dark matter halos. I. Nonparametric construction of density profiles and comparison with parametric models, Astron. J. 132, 2685 (2006).
  108. F. Prada, A. A. Klypin, E. Simonneau, J. Betancort-Rijo, S. Patiri, S. Gottlober, and M. A. Sanchez-Conde, How far do they go? The outer structure of dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 645, 1001 (2006).
  109. P. V. P. Cunha and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Stationary black holes and light rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 181101 (2020).
  110. R. Ghosh, S. Sk, and S. Sarkar, Hairy black holes: Nonexistence of short hairs and a bound on the light ring size, Phys. Rev. D 108, L041501 (2023).
  111. T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
  112. E. W. Leaver, An analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. R. Soc. A 402, 285 (1985).
  113. Y. Zhao, B. Sun, K. Lin, and Z. Cao, Axial gravtational ringing of a spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by dark matter spike, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024070 (2023).
  114. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Black hole spectroscopy and tests of general relativity with GW250114, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 041403 (2026).
  115. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s area law and the Kerr nature of black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 (2025).
  116. R. F. Rosato and P. Pani, Universality of late-time ringdown tails, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024080 (2025).
  117. N. Andersson, Evolving test fields in a black hole geometry, Phys. Rev. D 55, 468 (1997).
  118. T. F. M. Spieksma, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. Della Rocca, and F. Duque, Black hole spectroscopy in environments: Detectability prospects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081402 (2025).
  119. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, J. A. Gonzalez, and U. Sperhake, Mining information from binary black hole mergers: A comparison of estimation methods for complex exponentials in noise, Phys. Rev. D 75, 124017 (2007).
  120. R. Ghosh, R. P. Bhatt, S. Chakraborty, and S. Bose, Universal ladder structure across scales: From quantum to black hole physics, arXiv:2604.06249.
  121. W. E. Boyce, R. C. DiPrima, and D. B. Meade, Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 12 ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2021).
  122. R. Ghosh, N. Speeney, A. Chowdhury, C. Singha, M. A. S. Pinto and E. Berti, From density to mass: A new parametrized framework for dark matter environment around black holes, arXiv:2609.35771.
  123. T. Miyachi, R. Namba, H. Omiya, and N. Oshita, Path to an exact WKB analysis of black hole quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 124045 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 084070– Published 22 October, 2026
  • Received 20 August 2026
  • Accepted 21 September 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation