- Open Access
- Access by Xinjiang University
Strong phase and the PMNS phase in Dirac left-right symmetry
Phys. Rev. D 114, 095016 – Published 6 November, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mmvw-gcct
Abstract
Left-right symmetric theories with generalized parity restrict the bare QCD angle to a -conserving value and relate the physical strong- phase to a -odd parity-breaking parameter . We show that, in the Dirac-neutrino realization, imposing a sectorial reality condition on the Dirac lepton Yukawa matrices turns observable leptonic violation from an independent input into a branch-dependent prediction. Parity reconstructs the right-handed leptonic mixing matrix, whereas leptonic reality requires it to be rephasing-equivalent to the complex conjugate of the left-handed one. For generic three-generation Yukawas, compatibility is equivalent to the vanishing of a single Jarlskog-type -odd invariant. In the physical Dirac hierarchy, for fixed oscillation data, mass ordering, and discrete leptonic branch, compatibility determines the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) Jarlskog invariant as a function of the lightest neutrino mass and . We derive its leading analytic behavior and obtain the nonlinear compatibility branches numerically. In compressed mixed-sign Dirac-neutrino spectra, small signed mass sums can amplify a tiny parity deformation into order-one values of the normalized PMNS Jarlskog invariant, including maximal violation. The corresponding quark reconstruction independently provides a calculable, branch-dependent conversion between and . Together, the leptonic and quark relations define a family of correlations among leptonic violation, the absolute neutrino mass scale, and strong .
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (49)
- N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
- M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
- F. Takahashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 41, 2630011 (2026).
- G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8 (1976).
- R. J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 88B, 123 (1979); 91B, 487(E) (1980).
- C. Abel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020).
- B. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1958),https://jetp.ras.ru/files/pontecorvo1957_en.pdf.
- Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
- S. Abubakar et al. (T2K and NOvA Collaborations), Nature (London) 646, 818 (2025).
- J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974); 11, 703(E) (1975).
- R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2558 (1975).
- G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 12, 1502 (1975).
- G. Senjanovic, Nucl. Phys. B153, 334 (1979).
- R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Lett. 79B, 283 (1978).
- M. A. B. Beg and H. S. Tsao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 278 (1978).
- S. M. Barr, D. Chang, and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2765 (1991).
- Y. Zhang, H. An, X. Ji, and R. N. Mohapatra, Nucl. Phys. B802, 247 (2008).
- G. Senjanović and V. Tello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 071801 (2015).
- G. Senjanović and V. Tello, Phys. Rev. D 94, 095023 (2016).
- A. Maiezza and M. Nemevšek, Phys. Rev. D 90, 095002 (2014).
- S. Bertolini, A. Maiezza, and F. Nesti, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035036 (2020).
- V. Tello, Phys. Rev. D 113, 115060 (2026).
- R. N. Mohapatra, F. E. Paige, and D. P. Sidhu, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2462 (1978).
- R. N. Mohapatra and D. P. Sidhu, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1876 (1978).
- G. C. Branco, J. M. Frère, and J. M. Gérard, Nucl. Phys. B221, 317 (1983).
- D. Chang, Nucl. Phys. B214, 435 (1983).
- G. Ecker, W. Grimus, and H. Neufeld, Nucl. Phys. B247, 70 (1984).
- G. C. Branco and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1621 (1978).
- L. Vecchi, arXiv:2507.10680.
- M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 318, 119 (2005).
- J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and U. van Kolck, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 21 (2013).
- R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
- R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977).
- C. Jarlskog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1039 (1985).
- C. Jarlskog, Z. Phys. C 29, 491 (1985).
- G. C. Branco and M. N. Rebelo, Phys. Lett. B 173, 313 (1986).
- A. Maiezza, M. Nemevsek, F. Nesti, and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. D 82, 055022 (2010).
- V. Bernard, S. Descotes-Genon, and L. Vale Silva, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 088.
- I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
- I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, NuFIT v6.1: Three-neutrino fit based on data available in November 2025 (2025), accessed 6 August 2026, https://www.nu-fit.org/?q=node/309.
- M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Science 388, 180 (2025).
- W. Elbers et al., Phys. Rev. D 112, 083513 (2025).
- M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2005) 081.
- K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 170 (2026).
- B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 978 (2020).
- A. Alekou et al. (ESSnuSB Collaboration), Universe 9, 347 (2023).
- A. A. Esfahani et al. (Project 8 Collaboration), arXiv:2203.07349.
- N. J. Ayres et al. (n2EDM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 512 (2021).
- S. Antusch, K. Hinze, and S. Saad, Phys. Rev. D 113, 095011 (2026).