Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Flavor-physics benchmarks for tracker-based particle identification at the FCC-ee

Anja Beck* and Eluned Smith

  • Department of Physics and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *Contact author: anbeck@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 072016 – Published 28 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lnx2-s8wb

Abstract

The correct identification of charged hadrons plays a crucial role in flavor-physics measurements. The final detector configurations at the proposed Future Circular Collider are yet to be determined and this study aims to contribute to this discussion by benchmarking the particle-identification (PID) performance of the proposed CLD and IDEA detectors using fully simulated events. At present, neither detector proposal includes dedicated PID systems, relying instead on information from the tracking subsystems. We estimate the expected level of contamination due to misidentified charged hadrons for b-flavor tagging, rare bs transitions, and s-jet tagging. The PID information provided by silicon trackers, namely time-of-flight and energy-deposit measurements, leads to significant background suppression with high signal efficiency for the low-momentum hadrons considered for same-side b-flavor tagging. In order to improve the contamination in rare decays where momenta are in the medium range, only good timing resolution of 30 ps and below can yield an improvement of one order of magnitude below the level achieved by kinematic criteria alone. Light-quark jet-flavor tagging requires identification of particles with very large momentum, which is not possible using only time-of-flight or energy-deposit information in silicon. Access to the number of clusters in a drift-chamber setup, as proposed for the IDEA detector, however, results in strong background suppression in every case. This suppression can be further improved in some scenarios by time-of-flight resolution of 30–50 ps or better. The PID quality generally exhibits only a small dependence on the cluster-counting efficiency. Whether dedicated PID detectors could further enhance flavor-physics sensitivity should be the subject of future study.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), Future Circular Collider feasibility study report: Volume 1, physics, experiments, detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1468 (2025).
  2. W. Altmannshofer et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020)].
  3. G. Viehhauser et al., Detectors in Particle Physics: A Modern Introduction (CRC Press, Abingdon, 2024), 10.1201/9781003287674.
  4. R. Ricci (ALICE Collaboration), Study of MAPS silicon detector prototypes for the ALICE inner tracking system upgrade, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1059, 169000 (2024).
  5. N. Bacchetta et al., CLD—A detector concept for the FCC-ee, arXiv:1911.12230.
  6. M. Abbrescia et al. (IDEA Study Group), The IDEA detector concept for FCC-ee, arXiv:2502.21223.
  7. J. Pekkanen, ALLEGRO FCC-ee detector concept & noble liquid calorimetry, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1069, 169921 (2024).
  8. G. Ganis, C. Helsens, and V. Völkl, key4hep, a framework for future HEP experiments and its use in FCC, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 149 (2022).
  9. K. Heijhoff et al., Timing performance of the LHCb VELO Timepix3 Telescope, J. Instrum. 15, P09035 (2020).
  10. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Operation and performance of the CMS silicon strip tracker with proton-proton collisions at the CERN LHC, J. Instrum. 20, P08027 (2025).
  11. F. Cuna et al., Simulation of particle identification with the cluster counting technique, in International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (2021), arXiv:2105.07064.
  12. Track Momentum Resolution at LHCb in 2024, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2920248 (2024).
  13. S. Agostinelli et al., geant4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  14. J. Allison et al., geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  15. J. Allison et al., Recent developments in geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
  16. FCC-config: Configuration files for the fcc event-processing chain (2025), https://github.com/HEP-FCC/FCC-config/tree/main.
  17. CLDConfig: Configuration repository for the cld detector model in the key4hep stack, https://github.com/key4hep/CLDConfig (2025).
  18. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16 (ACM, 2016), pp. 785–794, 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
  19. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Updated measurement of time-dependent CP -violating observables in Bs0J/ψK+K decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 706 (2019); 80, 601(E) (2020).
  20. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), b flavour tagging using charm decays at the LHCb experiment, J. Instrum. 10, P10005 (2015).
  21. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), New algorithms for identifying the flavour of B0 mesons using pions and protons, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 238 (2017).
  22. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), A new algorithm for identifying the flavour of Bs0 mesons at LHCb, J. Instrum. 11, P05010 (2016).
  23. F. Abudinén et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), b -flavor tagging at Belle II, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 283 (2022).
  24. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B0K*0(892)μ+μ decay in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 864, 139406 (2025).
  25. S. Wehle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of BK*+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  26. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Angular analysis of Bd0K*μ+μ decays in pp collisions at s=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  27. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of CP -averaged observables in the B0K*0μ+μ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  28. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay Bs0ϕμ+μ, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 084.
  29. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay Bs0ϕμ+μ, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 179.
  30. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Branching fraction measurements of the rare Bs0ϕμ+μ and Bs0f2(1525)μ+μ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  31. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B0K(*)μ+μ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B+K*+μ+μ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161802 (2021).
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the B0K*0μ+μ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131801 (2024).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the B0K*0μ+μ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
  35. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality in B±K±μ+μ and B±K±e+e decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 077802 (2024).
  36. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of branching fractions and rate asymmetries in the rare decays BK(*)+, Phys. Rev. D 86, 032012 (2012).
  37. S. Choudhury et al. (Belle Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in BK decays, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 105.
  38. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality using B+K++ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).
  39. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality with B0K*0+ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 055.
  40. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality using Λb0pK+ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 040.
  41. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nat. Phys. 18, 277 (2022).
  42. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Tests of lepton universality using B0KS0+ and B+K*++ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191802 (2022).
  43. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+K++ and B0K*0+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
  44. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in bs+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  45. T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to pythia 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  46. D. J. Lange, The evtgen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
  47. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the radiative decay Bs0K+Kγ, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 093.
  48. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the Λb0pKγ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 098.
  49. K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a new charged charmoniumlike state in B¯0J/ψKπ+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 90, 112009 (2014).
  50. Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 226 (2021).
  51. H.-Y. Jiang and F.-S. Yu, Fragmentation-fraction ratio fΞb/fΛb0 in b—and c -baryon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 224 (2018).
  52. Y. Amhis et al., Prospects for searches of bsνν¯ decays at FCC-ee, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 144.
  53. T. H. Kwok et al., Time-dependent precision measurement of Bs0ϕμ+μ decay at FCC-ee, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 135 (2026).
  54. A. Beck, M. Elmarassy, A. Sabbagh, M. Kreps, and E. Smith, Constraints on new physics from decays of polarized Λb0 baryons at the FCC-ee, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055005 (2026).
  55. A. Di Canto, T. Hacheney, G. Hiller, D. S. Mitzel, S. Monteil, L. Röhrig, and D. Suelmann, New opportunities for rare charm from Zcc¯ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 18 (2026).
  56. M. Dong et al. (CEPC Study Group), CEPC conceptual design report: Volume 2–Physics & detector (2018).
  57. H. Abidi et al., FCC feasibility studies: Impact of tracker- and calorimeter-detector performance on jet flavor identification and Higgs physics analyses, Phys. Rev. D 112, 052002 (2025).
  58. F. Bedeschi, L. Gouskos, and M. Selvaggi, Jet flavour tagging for future colliders with fast simulation, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 646 (2022).
  59. A. Albert et al., Strange quark as a probe for new physics in the Higgs sector, in Proceedings of Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2203.07535.
  60. R. Barate et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Study of charm production in Z decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 597 (2000).
  61. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  62. M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), Future Circular Collider feasibility study report: Volume 2, accelerators, technical infrastructure and safety, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 234, 5713 (2025).
  63. A. Beck, A tracker-based particle-identification tool for the FCC-ee (2026), https://github.com/anjabeck/fccee-tracker-pid.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation