- Access by Xinjiang University
Optimal transport reconstruction of biased tracers in primordial non-Gaussian fields
Phys. Rev. D 114, 083502 – Published 2 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kjhd-7h86
Abstract
Optimal transport provides an efficient method to infer the displacement of objects by mapping their initial positions to their present-day locations over cosmic time; equivalently, it enables the reconstruction of initial positions from measurements taken at later times. The method has been shown to be accurate even if positions for only a biased subset of the particles are measured, provided that the initial displacement field was Gaussian. The method does not rely on the assumption of a Gaussian displacement field and thus may be extended to the reconstruction of non-Gaussian initial conditions. Here, we demonstrate how this is achieved for a class of “local” primordial non-Gaussian fields of current interest in cosmology. For these models, there is a distinctive signature in the large scale clustering of biased tracers that depends on the product of the primordial amplitude and the nature of the tracers . Our method exploits the fact that this signature is not present in the full field; it is only present in biased fields. Therefore, the mass that is not in the biased subset, what we call the “dust,” also has a characteristic scale dependence, albeit of a different amplitude. We show that the quality of the optimal transport reconstruction improves as the model for this dust becomes more realistic. Importantly, the dust model requires only the combination , and not itself: this is the same quantity that the scale-dependent bias signal measures directly, so the reconstruction is conditioned on an observable rather than on prior knowledge of the primordial amplitude.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (22)
- B. Lévy, R. Mohayaee, and S. von Hausegger, A fast semi-discrete optimal transport algorithm for the unique reconstruction of the early Universe, Technical Report, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Inria, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, Oxford University, 2020.
- F. Nikakhtar, R. K. Sheth, B. Lévy, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 251101 (2022).
- F. Nikakhtar, N. Padmanabhan, B. Lévy, R. K. Sheth, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083534 (2023).
- F. Nikakhtar, R. K. Sheth, N. Padmanabhan, B. Lévy, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123512 (2024).
- O. Doré et al., arXiv:1412.4872.
- E. Chaussidon et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2025) 029.
- S. Chiarenza et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2026) 098.
- U. Frisch, S. Matarrese, R. Mohayaee, and A. Sobolevski, Nature (London) 417, 260 (2002).
- Y. Brenier, U. Frisch, M. Hénon, G. Loeper, S. Matarrese, R. Mohayaee, and A. Sobolevskii, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346 (2003).
- R. Mohayaee, H. Mathis, S. Colombi, and J. Silk, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 365, 939 (2006).
- B. Lévy, ESAIM M2AN (Mathematical Modeling and Analysis) (2015).
- S. von Hausegger, B. Lévy, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 201302 (2022).
- R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 308, 119 (1999).
- N. Dalal, O. Doré, D. Huterer, and A. Shirokov, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123514 (2008).
- W. R. Coulton, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Jamieson, M. Baldi, G. Jung, D. Karagiannis, M. Liguori, L. Verde, and B. D. Wandelt, Astrophys. J. 943, 64 (2023).
- Y.-C. Cai, G. Bernstein, and R. K. Sheth, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 995 (2011).
- N. Hamaus, U. Seljak, and V. Desjacques, Phys. Rev. D 84, 083509 (2011).
- H. J. Mo and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 347 (1996).
- V. Desjacques, M. Crocce, R. Scoccimarro, and R. K. Sheth, Phys. Rev. D 82, 103529 (2010).
- P. Ganeshaiah Veena, R. Lilow, and A. Nusser, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 5291 (2023).
- X. Chen, N. Padmanabhan, and D. J. Eisenstein, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 055.
- J. Bottema, T. Flöss, and P. Daniel Meerburg, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 030.