Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Systematic study of exotic 1+ tetraquark spectroscopy

Kai Xu*, Zheng Zhao, Nattapat Tagsinsit, Attaphon Kaewsnod, Ayut Limphirat, Christoph Herold§, and Yupeng Yan

  • *Contact author: gxukai1123@gmail.com
  • Contact author: zhaozheng1022@hotmail.com
  • Contact author: nattapattagsinsit@gmail.com
  • §Contact author: herold@g.sut.ac.th
  • Contact author: yupeng@sut.ac.th

Phys. Rev. D 113, 076001 – Published 1 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k433-k66l

Abstract

The masses of exotic quantum-number 1+ compact tetraquark states are calculated in a constituent quark model, where a Cornell-like potential is employed as the central potential, spin-spin and spin-orbit coupling derived from the Breit-Fermi interaction are treated as hyperfine corrections, and model parameters are taken from previous works. The ground state 1+ P-wave tetraquarks are predicted at 1.9, 4.2, and 6.6 GeV for the light, charmoniumlike, and fully charm sectors, respectively. The decay width ratios of 1+ tetraquark states are calculated for two-body strong decay channels within the rearrangement mechanism, including ωh1 and ηf1 for isospin I=0 light tetraquarks, ρh1 and πf1 for isospin I=1 light tetraquarks, π/η+χc1 and ρ/ω+hc for charmoniumlike tetraquarks, and ηcχc1 and J/ψhc for fully charm tetraquarks. The theoretical results are compared with the observed exotic 1+ states, and promising search channels for 1+ tetraquarks are discussed. The work suggests that η1(1855) is unlikely to be a compact tetraquark state.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005).
  2. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 142002 (2007).
  3. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 111103 (2014).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 46, 111002 (2022).
  5. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 161901 (2024).
  6. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  7. D. Alde et al. (IHEP-Brussels-Los Alamos-Annecy(LAPP) Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 205, 397 (1988).
  8. G. S. Adams et al. (E852 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5760 (1998).
  9. J. Kuhn et al. (E852 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 595, 109 (2004).
  10. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 192002 (2022); 130, 159901(E) (2023).
  11. Z. Zhao, K. Xu, A. Kaewsnod, X. Liu, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 103, 116027 (2021).
  12. Z. Zhao, K. Xu, A. Kaewsnod, X. Liu, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 105, 036001 (2022).
  13. Z. Zhao, A. Kaewsnod, K. Xu, N. Tagsinsit, X. Liu, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, arXiv:2503.00552.
  14. G.-J. Wang, L. Meng, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036016 (2021).
  15. W.-L. Wu and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034044 (2025).
  16. F. Schoberl, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 94A, 79 (1986).
  17. C. Shi, Y. Chen, M. Gong, X. Jiang, Z. Liu, and W. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094513 (2024).
  18. M. A. Matveev, A. T. Sitnikov, and A. V. Sarantsev, arXiv:2505.16711.
  19. M. Lu et al. (E852 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 032002 (2005).
  20. D. V. Amelin et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 68, 359 (2005).
  21. C. A. Meyer and E. S. Swanson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82, 21 (2015).
  22. D. Spülbeck (COMPASS Collaboration), in 21st International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy and Structure (2025), arXiv:2508.18908.
  23. B. Chen and X. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 788 (2025).
  24. N. Isgur and J. E. Paton, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2910 (1985).
  25. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034508 (2010).
  26. Z.-R. Huang, H.-Y. Jin, and Z.-F. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 004.
  27. Z.-R. Huang, H.-Y. Jin, T. G. Steele, and Z.-F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054037 (2016).
  28. H.-X. Chen, A. Hosaka, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 78, 054017 (2008).
  29. H.-X. Chen, A. Hosaka, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 78, 117502 (2008).
  30. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, P. Guo, and C. E. Thomas (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 094505 (2013).
  31. L. Qiu and Q. Zhao, Chin. Phys. C 46, 051001 (2022).
  32. H.-X. Chen, N. Su, and S.-L. Zhu, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 051201 (2022).
  33. V. Shastry, C. S. Fischer, and F. Giacosa, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137478 (2022).
  34. X.-Y. Wang, F.-C. Zeng, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036005 (2022).
  35. F. Chen, X. Jiang, Y. Chen, M. Gong, Z. Liu, C. Shi, and W. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054511 (2023).
  36. E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074028 (2023).
  37. B. Chen, S.-Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054034 (2023).
  38. V. Shastry and F. Giacosa, Nucl. Phys. A1037, 122683 (2023).
  39. Z.-X. Ma, Q. Huang, L.-M. Wang, X.-H. Hu, Y. Tan, J. He, and H.-X. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 112, L111503 (2025).
  40. X.-K. Dong, Y.-H. Lin, and B.-S. Zou, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 261011 (2022).
  41. F. Yang, H. Q. Zhu, and Y. Huang, Nucl. Phys. A1030, 122571 (2023).
  42. Y. Tan, Y.-H. Wu, Q. Huang, X. Chen, X. Hu, Y. Yang, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094004 (2025).
  43. Z.-S. Liu, X.-L. Chen, D.-K. Lian, N. Li, and W. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014014 (2025).
  44. B.-D. Wan, S.-Q. Zhang, and C.-F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074003 (2022).
  45. M.-J. Yan, J. M. Dias, A. Guevara, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Universe 9, 109 (2023).
  46. C. Shi, Y. Chen, M. Gong, X. Jiang, Z. Liu, and W. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094513 (2024).
  47. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), arXiv:2504.13539.
  48. K.-T. Chao, Z.-G. He, D. Li, and C. Meng, arXiv:1310.8597.
  49. X.-Y. Zhang, P.-P. Shi, and F.-K. Guo, Phys. Lett. B 867, 139603 (2025).
  50. C.-Z. Yuan, Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwab182 (2021).
  51. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 122001 (2022).
  52. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020).
  53. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024).
  54. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023).
  55. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Nature (London) 648, 58 (2025).
  56. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114039 (2020).
  57. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094035 (2021).
  58. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:2509.13101.
  59. M. Pelizaeus (PANDA Collaboration), in 5th International Workshop on Charm Physics (2012), arXiv:1210.4701.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation