Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Shadows observable correspondence in Kerr and static quadrupolar spacetimes

Saken Toktarbay* and Aray Muratkhan

Nurgissa Myrzakulov

Hernando Quevedo§

  • *Contact author: Saken.Toktarbay@kaznu.edu.kz
  • Contact author: Aray.Muratkhan@kaznu.kz
  • Contact author: myrzakulov_na@enu.kz
  • §Contact author: quevedo@nucleares.unam.mx

Phys. Rev. D 114, 024053 – Published 21 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jxhk-p2g8

Abstract

High-resolution images of M87* and Sgr A* turn black-hole shadows into practical probes of strong gravity, making it useful to distinguish between observables that encode the overall angular scale of a shadow and those that remain sensitive to the detailed geometry of the underlying spacetime. We compare the Kerr geometry with a static, axisymmetric quadrupolar benchmark spacetime (the Zipoy-Voorhees or q-metric) using quantities tied directly to measurement and defined on the local observer sky. In this work, the q-metric is used not as a literal astrophysical black-hole model, but as a controlled nonrotating reference geometry that isolates quadrupolar deformation without frame dragging. For the q-metric we derive compact finite-distance expressions for the equatorial photon sphere, the critical impact parameter, and the angular radius seen by a static observer, thereby clarifying the domain and limits of shadow formation: the photon sphere exists for q>3/2 with rph(q)=m(3+2q), while the requirement that it lies outside the curvature singularity and that bcr(q) be real and positive restricts observable static shadows to q>1/2, with the angular size decreasing monotonically as q becomes more negative within this domain. In the case of the Kerr spacetime, we use the standard parametric description of spherical photon orbits to compute the shadow at finite distance and arbitrary inclination. To compare the two models operationally, we define q(a;rO,ϑO) by equating a single, well-specified angular radius on the observer’s sky; we adopt the vertical (top) radius to avoid edge degeneracies. In the far field, this yields a single-valued correspondence within the explored domain governed by the critical impact parameters, bK(a,ϑO)=bcr(q), and a small–deformation approximation provides accurate estimates at moderate spin. We emphasize that this construction defines a controlled size-level correspondence rather than a full degeneracy of the shadow contour. We identify a regime in which static quadrupolar deformations reproduce the Kerr vertical angular scale and show that simple additional observables—the vertical and horizontal radii, the centroid shift and a basic distortion measure—restore discriminating power within the present contour-level benchmark setting. In this way, the analysis separates what can be matched at the level of a single angular-size observable from what remains specifically sensitive to rotation. The framework offers a systematic route from image-plane data to a controlled comparison between Kerr and a static quadrupolar benchmark geometry at finite distance, helping identify which shadow features are associated with scale matching and which remain specific to rotational asymmetry.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022).
  2. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole, Astrophys. J. 875, L1 (2019).
  3. GRAVITY Collaboration, Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic Centre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys. 615, L15 (2018).
  4. David M. Zipoy, Topology of some spheroidal metrics, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 1137 (1966).
  5. B. H. Voorhees, Static axially symmetric gravitational fields, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2119 (1970).
  6. Hernando Quevedo, Mass quadrupole as a source of naked singularities, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 1779 (2011).
  7. Hernando Quevedo, Saken Toktarbay, and Aimuratov Yerlan, Quadrupolar gravitational fields described by the q-metric, Int. J. Math. Phys. 3, 133 (2012).
  8. K. Boshkayev, E. Gasperín, A. C. Gutiérrez-Piñeres, H. Quevedo, and S. Toktarbay, Motion of test particles in the field of a naked singularity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024024 (2016).
  9. Roger Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969).
  10. Stephen W. Hawking and George F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  11. Robert M. Wald, Gravitational collapse and cosmic censorship, in Black Holes, Gravitational Radiation and the Universe: Essays in Honor of CV Vishveshwara (Springer, New York, 1999), pp. 69–86.
  12. Hernando Quevedo, On the exterior gravitational field of a mass with a multipole moment, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 19, 1013 (1987).
  13. H. Quevedo, Multipole structure of compact objects, arXiv:1606.05985.
  14. Francisco Frutos-Alfaro and Michael Soffel, On relativistic multipole moments of stationary space–times, R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 180640 (2018).
  15. S. Toktarbay and H. Quevedo, A stationary q-metric, Gravitation Cosmol. 20, 252 (2014).
  16. Ozay Gurtug, Mustafa Halilsoy, and Mert Mangut, The charged Zipoy–Voorhees metric with astrophysical applications, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 671 (2022).
  17. Medeu Abishev, Nurzada Beissen, Farida Belissarova, Kuantay Boshkayev, Aizhan Mansurova, Aray Muratkhan, Hernando Quevedo, and Saken Toktarbay, Approximate perfect fluid solutions with quadrupole moment, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2150096 (2021).
  18. Hernando Quevedo and Saken Toktarbay, Generating static perfect-fluid solutions of Einstein’s equations, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 56, 052502 (2015).
  19. Kuantay Boshkayev, Hernando Quevedo, Saken Toktarbay, Bakytzhan Zhami, and Medeu Abishev, On the equivalence of approximate stationary axially symmetric solutions of the Einstein field equations, Gravitation Cosmol. 22, 305 (2016).
  20. Kumar S. Virbhadra and George F. R. Ellis, Gravitational lensing by naked singularities, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103004 (2002).
  21. Rajibul Shaikh, Prashant Kocherlakota, Ramesh Narayan, and Pankaj S. Joshi, Shadows of spherically symmetric black holes and naked singularities, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482, 52 (2019).
  22. Dipanjan Dey, Pankaj S. Joshi, and Rajibul Shaikh, Shadow of nulllike and timelike naked singularities without photon spheres, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024015 (2021).
  23. Volker Perlick and Oleg Yu. Tsupko, Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies, Phys. Rep. 947, 1 (2022).
  24. J. A. Arrieta-Villamizar, J. M. Velásquez-Cadavid, O. M. Pimentel, F. D. Lora-Clavijo, and A. C. Gutiérrez-Piñeres, Shadows around the q-metric, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 015008 (2020).
  25. Song Li, Temurbek Mirzaev, Ahmadjon A. Abdujabbarov, Daniele Malafarina, Bobomurat Ahmedov, and Wen-Biao Han, Constraining the deformation of a rotating black hole mimicker from its shadow, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084041 (2022).
  26. A. Muratkhan, A. Orazymbet, M. Zhakipova, M. Assylbek, and S. Toktarbay, A shadows from the static black hole mimickers, Int. J. Math. Phys. 13, 44 (2023).
  27. Kyriakos Destounis, Giulia Huez, and Kostas D. Kokkotas, Geodesics and gravitational waves in chaotic extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: the curious case of Zipoy-Voorhees black-hole mimickers, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 55, 71 (2023).
  28. A. Idrissov, K. Boshkayev, K. F. Dialektopoulos, A. Urazalina, and D. Utepova, Geodesic deviation in the q-metric, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 319 (2025).
  29. Kenta Hioki and Kei-ichi Maeda, Measurement of the Kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow, Phys. Rev. D 80, 024042 (2009).
  30. L. Synge, The escape of photons from gravitationally intense stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 131, 463 (1966).
  31. J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), edited by C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt (1973), pp. 215–239.
  32. Roy P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
  33. Brandon Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys. Rev. 174, 1559 (1968).
  34. Arne Grenzebach, Volker Perlick, and Claus Lämmerzahl, Photon regions and shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT black holes with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124004 (2014).
  35. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, New York, 1983).
  36. Prashant Kocherlakota, Luciano Rezzolla et al., Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT observations of M87*, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104047 (2021).
  37. Sunny Vagnozzi, Rittick Roy, Yu-Dai Tsai, Luca Visinelli, Misba Afrin, Alireza Allahyari, Parth Bambhaniya, Dipanjan Dey, Sushant G. Ghosh, Pankaj S. Joshi, Kimet Jusufi, Mohsen Khodadi, Rahul Kumar Walia, Ali Övgün, and Cosimo Bambi, Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A*, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 165007 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation