- Access by Xinjiang University
-transform amplitude modulation
Phys. Rev. D 114, 083013 – Published 6 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/j9rb-tj52
Abstract
We present Q-transform amplitude modulation (qtam), a novel, fully invertible implementation of the constant-Q transform (CQT) algorithm, designed to enable robust signal denoising and the disentanglement of overlapping transient events in current and, especially, next generation gravitational wave observatories. Conventional time-frequency (TF) analysis faces a fundamental dichotomy: critically sampled transforms (e.g., standard discrete wavelets) are computationally efficient but lack time-shift equivariance, limiting their efficacy for robust pattern recognition and deep learning applications. While alternative approaches such as the dual-tree complex wavelet transform provide efficient approximate shift invariance, their wavelet constructions remain tied to dyadic scale frequency tilings that are poorly matched to the simultaneous representation of compact binary chirps and instrumental glitches. Scattering transforms further improve translation stability, but do so through nonlinear modulus and averaging operations that sacrifice phase coherence and are not designed for exact signal reconstruction. Conversely, overcomplete transforms (e.g., standard CQT or stationary wavelets) provide the necessary shift-equivariance and tunable frequency resolution, but their implementations generate highly redundant data volumes that are prohibitive for low-latency processing. Furthermore, standard attempts to compress these dense representations rely on lossy interpolation or magnitude-only reduction, destroying the phase coherence required to reconstruct the time-domain signal. qtam bridges this gap by employing a methodology inspired by amplitude modulation radio broadcasting. By modeling the Q-transform output as a slowly varying complex envelope carried by a known deterministic high-frequency term, we achieve lossless data decimation via spectral shifting to baseband. We demonstrate that qtam is linear and fully invertible, allowing exact reconstruction of the original time-series signal with machine precision while retaining the shift-equivariance of dense spectrograms. Leveraging native graphics processing unit acceleration (pytorch), qtam achieves speedups of approximately two orders of magnitude with respect to standard implementations, enabling high-fidelity TF pipelines to operate within strict low-latency [] bounds. We validate the method’s potential for denoising and disentanglement through tests on real gravitational wave data and simulated signal injections.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (72)
- D. Gabor, Theory of communication. part 1: The analysis of information, J. Inst. Electr. Eng.—part III 93, 429 (1946).
- J. C. Brown, Calculation of a constant q spectral transform, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 425 (1991).
- S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way (Academic Press, Inc., New York, 2008).
- I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1992).
- Boualem Boashash, Time-Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing: A Comprehensive Reference (Academic Press, New York, 2015).
- S. Chatterji, L. Blackburn, G. Martin, and E. Katsavounidis, Multiresolution techniques for the detection of gravitational-wave bursts, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1809 (2004).
- Sergey Klimenko et al., Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors, Phys. Rev. D 93, 042004 (2016).
- M. Zevin et al., Gravity spy: Integrating Advanced LIGO detector characterization, machine learning, and citizen science, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 064003 (2017).
- H Adeli, S Ghosh-Dastidar, and N Dadmehr, Analysis of eeg records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform, J. Neurosci. Methods 123, 69 (2003).
- Paul S Addison, Wavelet transforms and the ECG: A review, Physiol. Meas. 26, R155 (2005).
- Ramazan Gençay, Faruk Selçuk, and Brandon Whitcher, An Introduction to Wavelets and Other Filtering Methods in Finance and Economics (Academic Press, New York, 2001).
- M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
- Marco Drago, Sergey Klimenko, Claudia Lazzaro, Edoardo Milotti, Guenakh Mitselmakher, Valentin Necula, Brendan O’Brian, Giovanni Andrea Prodi, Francesco Salemi, Marek Szczepanczyk, Shubhanshu Tiwari, Vaibhav Tiwari, Gayathri V, Gabriele Vedovato, and Igor Yakushin, coherent waveburst a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis, SoftwareX 14, 100678 (2021).
- Warren G. Anderson, Patrick R. Brady, Jolien D. E. Creighton, and Éanna É, Flanagan, Excess power statistic for detection of burst sources of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 042003 (2001).
- Neil J. Cornish and Tyson B. Littenberg, Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 135012 (2015).
- F Acernese et al., Virgo detector characterization and data quality: Tools, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 185005 (2023).
- Florent Robinet, Nicolas Arnaud, Nicolas Leroy, Andrew Lundgren, Duncan Macleod, and Jessica McIver, Omicron: A tool to characterize transient noise in gravitational-wave detectors, SoftwareX 12, 100620 (2020).
- S. Álvarez-López, A. Liyanage, J. Ding, R. Ng, and J. McIver, Gspynettree: A signal-vs-glitch classifier for gravitational-wave event candidates, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 085007 (2024).
- M. Zevin et al., Gravity spy: Integrating advanced ligo detector characterization, machine learning, and citizen science, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 064003 (2017).
- Tabata Aira Ferreira and Gabriela González, Using t-SNE for characterizing glitches in LIGO detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 105010 (2025).
- Melissa Lopez, Vincent Boudart, Kerwin Buijsman, Amit Reza, and Sarah Caudill, Simulating transient noise bursts in LIGO with generative adversarial networks, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023027 (2022).
- D. M. Macleod, J. S. Areeda, S. B. Coughlin, T. J. Massinger, and A. L. Urban, Gwpy: A Python package for gravitational-wave astrophysics, SoftwareX 13, 100657 (2021).
- O. Gramaxo Freitas et al., Assessment of normalizing flows for parameter estimation on time-frequency representations of gravitational-wave data, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 015036 (2024).
- R. Macas, J. Pooley, L. K. Nuttall, D. Davis, M. J. Dyer, Y. Lecoeuche, J. D. Lyman, J. McIver, and K. Rink, Impact of noise transients on low latency gravitational-wave event localization, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103021 (2022).
- B. P. Abbott et al., Low-latency gravitational-wave alerts for multimessenger astronomy during the second Advanced LIGO and Virgo observing run, Astrophys. J. 875, 161 (2019).
- M. Punturo et al., The Einstein telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
- D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 35 (2019), https://baas.aas.org/pub/2020n7i035/release/1.
- R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), The science of the Einstein Telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 081.
- P. Relton, A. Virtuoso, S. Bini, V. Raymond, I. Harry, M. Drago, C. Lazzaro, A. Miani, and S. Tiwari, Addressing the challenges of detecting time-overlapping compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104045 (2022).
- S. Bagnasco et al., Computing challenges for the Einstein telescope project, EPJ Web Conf. 295, 04015 (2024).
- Andrea Virtuoso and Edoardo Milotti, Wavelet-based tools to analyze, filter, and reconstruct transient gravitational-wave signals, Phys. Rev. D 109, 102010 (2024).
- Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by F. Pereira, C. J. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger (Curran Associates, Inc., 2012), Vol. 25.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017), Vol. 30.
- Elena Cuoco, Jade Powell, Marco Cavaglià, Kendall Ackley, Michał Bejger, Chayan Chatterjee, Michael Coughlin, Scott Coughlin, Paul Easter, Reed Essick, Hunter Gabbard, Timothy Gebhard, Shaon Ghosh, Leïla Haegel, Alberto Iess, David Keitel, Zsuzsa Márka, Szabolcs Márka, Filip Morawski, Tri Nguyen, Rich Ormiston, Michael Pürrer, Massimiliano Razzano, Kai Staats, Gabriele Vajente, and Daniel Williams, Enhancing gravitational-wave science with machine learning, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 011002 (2020).
- W. Benoit E. Marx D. Chatterjee R. Kumarand A. Gunny, ml4gw: pytorch utilities for training neural networks in gravitational wave physics applications, J. Open Source Softwaare 10, 8836 (2025).
- X. Su L. Liu and G. Wang, On inversion of continuous wavelet transform, Open J. Stat. 5, 714 (2015).
- A. Virtuoso E. Milotti, Wavelet-based tools to analyze, filter, and reconstruct transient gravitational-wave signals/code release (1.0), Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10649073 (2024).
- Riccardo Felicetti, Timeseries project, https://github.com/Unoaccaso/timeseries (2024), (accessed: 2025-11-03).
- T. Mishra, V. Tiwari, S. Klimenko, G. Vedovato, and G. Mitselmakher, coherent waveburst with extended pixels for gravitational-wave burst searches, Phys. Rev. D 104, 023014 (2021).
- Karlheinz Gröchenig, Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2001).
- Gino A. Velasco, Nicki Holighaus, Monika Dörfler, and Thomas Grill, Constructing an invertible constant-q transform with nonstationary gabor frames, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx) (2011), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:51779425.
- Nicki Holighaus, Monika Dörfler, Gino A. Velasco, and Thomas Grill, A framework for invertible real-time constant-q transforms, IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Language Process. 21, 775 (2013).
- Alan V. Oppenheim, Alan S. Willsky, and S. Hamid Nawab, Signals and Systems (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1999).
- Neil J. Cornish, Fast Bayesian inference for gravitational wave signals, Phys. Rev. D 82, 044007 (2010).
- R. J. Dupuis and G. Woan, Bayesian estimation of pulsar parameters from gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D 72, 102002 (2005).
This concept of AM is rooted in the wired undulatory current of Alexander Graham Bell [47] and the wireless experiments of Roberto Landell de Moura [48], before being adapted for continuous-wave radio by Reginald Fessenden [49, 50] and later perfected for high-efficiency reception and demodulation by Edwin Armstrong [51].
- Alexander Graham Bell, Improvement in telegraphy, U.S. Patent 174,465, 1876.
- Roberto Landell de Moura, Phonetic transmission at a distance, with or without wire, through space, earth and water, Brazilian Patent 3,279, 1901.
- Reginald A. Fessenden, Apparatus for signaling by electromagnetic waves, U.S. Patent 706,747A, 1902.
- Simon S. Haykin, Communication Systems, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001).
- Edwin H. Armstrong, Some recent developments in the audion receiver, Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 2, 215 (1914).
- L. Asprea et al., Glitchflow, a digital twin for transient noise in gravitational wave interferometers, in Proceedings of CHEP 2024 (2024), 10.1051/epjconf/202533701203.
- P. P. Vaidyanathan, Multirate Systems and Filter Banks (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
I.e., of the order of machine precision. Note that too small values might cause underflow/overflow or approximation errors, effectively altering the values of the Q transform.
- Agata Trovato, GWOSC: Gravitational wave open science center, Proc. Sci. Asterics2019 (2019) 082.
For the comparison with Omicron, we implemented a script utilizing Omicron’s core class functions. Some parameters were adjusted from standard settings to ensure an output matrix of fixed resolution (), matching the resolution computed by qtam and the other implementations. It is important to note that this benchmarking isolates the speed of computing the CQT as complex matrices; Omicron is designed as a full transient detection pipeline, including trigger management and parallel channel handling, which are outside the scope of this specific speed test.
- Anuradha Samajdar, Justin Janquart, Chris Van Den Broeck, and Tim Dietrich, Biases in parameter estimation from overlapping gravitational-wave signals in the third-generation detector era, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044003 (2021).
- B. Sathyaprakash et al., Scientific objectives of Einstein telescope, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 124013 (2012).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), Gwtc-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
- M. Hannam et al., General-relativistic precession in a black-hole binary, Nature (London) 610, 652 (2022).
- V. Varma, S. Biscoveanu, T. Islam, F. H. Shaik, C.-J. Haster, M. Isi, W. M. Farr, S. E. Field, and S. Vitale, Evidence of large recoil velocity from a black hole merger signal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191102 (2022).
- Ronaldas Macas, Andrew Lundgren, and Gregory Ashton, Revisiting the evidence for precession in GW200129 with machine learning noise mitigation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 062006 (2024).
- D. DavisT. B. Littenberg, I. M. Romero-Shaw, M. Millhouse, J. McIver, F. Di Renzo, and G. Ashton, Subtracting glitches from gravitational-wave detector data during the third LIGO-Virgo observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 245013 (2022).
- Nihar Gupte, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, Jonathan Gair, M. Coleman Miller, Maximilian Dax, Stephen R. Green, Michael Pürrer, Jonas Wildberger, Jakob Macke, Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, and Bernhard Schölkopf, Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104045 (2025).
- E. Payne, S. Hourihane, J. Golomb, R. Udall, D. Davis, and K. Chatziioannou, Curious case of GW200129: Interplay between spin-precession inference and data-quality issues, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104017 (2022).
- G. Ashton et al., bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 241, 27 (2019).
- Cecilio García-Quirós, Marta Colleoni, Sascha Husa, Héctor Estellés, Geraint Pratten, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Maite Mateu-Lucena, and Rafel Jaume, Multimode frequency-domain model for the gravitational wave signal from nonprecessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064002 (2020).
- https://github.com/dottormale/Qtransform_torch/tree/main/QTAM.
- http://gwosc.org.
- J. C. Driggers et al., Improving astrophysical parameter estimation via offline noise subtraction for Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 99, 042001 (2019).
- Neil J. Cornish and Tyson B. Littenberg, BayesWave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 135012 (2015).
- Tyson B. Littenberg and Neil J. Cornish, Bayesian inference for spectral estimation of gravitational wave detector noise, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084034 (2015).