Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Topological entanglement entropy meets holographic entropy inequalities

Joydeep Naskar1,2,* and Sai Satyam Samal3,†

  • *Contact author: naskar.j@northeastern.edu
  • Contact author: samals@purdue.edu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 026025 – Published 16 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hvf8-jcff

Abstract

Topological entanglement entropy (TEE) is an efficient way to detect topological order in the ground state of gapped Hamiltonians. The seminal work of Kitaev and Preskill [“Topological entanglement entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)], and simultaneously by Levin and Wen [“Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006)] proposed separate definitions of TEE based on a subtraction scheme. In the present work, we explain why the subtraction schemes work for the computation of TEE and generalize them for an arbitrary number of subregions by explicitly noting the necessary conditions for an information quantity to capture TEE. Our analysis puts the two definitions [Kitaev and Preskill, “Topological entanglement entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006), Levin and Wen, “Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006)] into separate classes. Focusing on cyclic information quantities Q2n+1 and multi-information In, we propose a generalized framework for defining TEE. We also show that the holographic entropy inequalities are satisfied by the quantum entanglement entropy of the nondegenerate ground state of a topologically ordered two-dimensional medium with a mass gap.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982).
  2. Xiao-Gang Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).
  3. Nabil Iqbal and John McGreevy, Mean string field theory: Landau-Ginzburg theory for 1-form symmetries, SciPost Phys. 13, 114 (2022).
  4. John McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57 (2023).
  5. Jason Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012).
  6. J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identical particles, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971–1996) 37, 1 (1977).
  7. Frank Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 957 (1982).
  8. Daniel Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and Frank Wilczek, Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984).
  9. Avinash Khare, Fractional Statistics and Quantum Theory, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005).
  10. Alexei Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 321, 2 (2006).
  11. Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008).
  12. Sumathi Rao, Introduction to Abelian and non-Abelian anyons, arXiv:1610.09260.
  13. J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nat. Phys. 16, 931 (2020).
  14. H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Plaçais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. Fève, Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science 368, 173 (2020).
  15. M. Ruelle, E. Frigerio, J.-M. Berroir, B. Plaçais, J. Rech, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. Fève, Comparing fractional quantum Hall Laughlin and jain topological orders with the anyon collider, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011031 (2023).
  16. X. G. Wen and Q. Niu, Ground-state degeneracy of the fractional quantum Hall states in the presence of a random potential and on high-genus Riemann surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9377 (1990).
  17. F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983).
  18. Alexei Kitaev and John Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006).
  19. Michael Levin and Xiao-Gang Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006).
  20. Mark Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 666 (1993).
  21. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  22. Elliott H. Lieb and Mary Beth Ruskai, Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 1938 (1973).
  23. Patrick Hayden, Matthew Headrick, and Alexander Maloney, Holographic mutual information is monogamous, Phys. Rev. D 87, 046003 (2013).
  24. Ning Bao, ChunJun Cao, Michael Walter, and Zitao Wang, Holographic entropy inequalities and gapped phases of matter, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 203.
  25. Ning Bao, Sepehr Nezami, Hirosi Ooguri, Bogdan Stoica, James Sully, and Michael Walter, The holographic entropy cone, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 130.
  26. Ning Bao, Keiichiro Furuya, and Joydeep Naskar, Towards a complete classification of holographic entropy inequalities, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 117.
  27. Isaac H. Kim, Michael Levin, Ting-Chun Lin, Daniel Ranard, and Bowen Shi, Universal lower bound on topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 166601 (2023).
  28. Michael Levin, Physical proof of the topological entanglement entropy inequality, Phys. Rev. B 110, 165154 (2024).
  29. Liujun Zou and Jeongwan Haah, Spurious long-range entanglement and replica correlation length, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075151 (2016).
  30. Luiz H. Santos, Jennifer Cano, Michael Mulligan, and Taylor L. Hughes, Symmetry-protected topological interfaces and entanglement sequences, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075131 (2018).
  31. Dominic J. Williamson, Arpit Dua, and Meng Cheng, Spurious topological entanglement entropy from subsystem symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140506 (2019).
  32. David T. Stephen, Henrik Dreyer, Mohsin Iqbal, and Norbert Schuch, Detecting subsystem symmetry protected topological order via entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115112 (2019).
  33. Kohtaro Kato and Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Toy model of boundary states with spurious topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032005 (2020).
  34. Isaac H. Kim, Michael Levin, Ting-Chun Lin, Daniel Ranard, and Bowen Shi, Universal lower bound on topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 166601 (2023).
  35. John Preskill, Topological quantum computation (2004), https://www.preskill.caltech.edu/ph219/topological.pdf.
  36. We thank Michael Levin for working out this example with us.

  37. Juan Martin Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  38. Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  39. Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2006) 045.
  40. Bartłomiej Czech, Sirui Shuai, Yixu Wang, and Daiming Zhang, Holographic entropy inequalities and the topology of entanglement wedge nesting, Phys. Rev. D 109, L101903 (2024).
  41. Temple He, Matthew Headrick, and Veronika E. Hubeny, Holographic entropy relations repackaged, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 118.
  42. Sergio Hernández Cuenca, Holographic entropy cone for five regions, Phys. Rev. D 100, 026004 (2019).
  43. Temple He, Veronika E. Hubeny, and Mukund Rangamani, Superbalance of holographic entropy inequalities, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 245.
  44. Sergio Hernández-Cuenca, Veronika E. Hubeny, and Frederic Jia, Holographic entropy inequalities and multipartite entanglement, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 238.
  45. Ning Bao, Keiichiro Furuya, and Joydeep Naskar, A framework for generalizing toric inequalities for holographic entanglement entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 251.
  46. Ning Bao and Joydeep Naskar, Properties of the contraction map for holographic entanglement entropy inequalities, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 039.
  47. H. Casini and M. Huerta, A Finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem, Phys. Lett. B 600, 142 (2004).
  48. Horacio Casini and Marina Huerta, Lectures on entanglement in quantum field theory, Proc. Sci. TASI2021 (2023) 002. [arXiv:2201.13310].
  49. Veronika E. Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Massimiliano Rota, The holographic entropy arrangement, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900011 (2019).
  50. Lauren McGough and Herman Verlinde, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as topological entanglement entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 208.
  51. Ning Bao, Ling-Yan Hung, Yikun Jiang, and Zhihan Liu, QG from SymQRG: AdS3/CFT2 correspondence as topological symmetry-preserving quantum RG flow, arXiv:2412.12045.
  52. Vijay Balasubramanian, Monica Jinwoo Kang, Chitraang Murdia, and Simon F. Ross, Signals of multiparty entanglement and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 068.
  53. Abhijit Gadde, Jonathan Harper, and Vineeth Krishna, Multi-invariants and bulk replica symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 116.
  54. Chris Akers, Sergio Hernández-Cuenca, and Pratik Rath, Quantum extremal surfaces and the holographic entropy cone, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 177.
  55. Guglielmo Grimaldi, Matthew Headrick, and Veronika E. Hubeny, A new characterization of the holographic entropy cone, SciPost Phys. 20, 122 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation