Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

First-order thermodynamics of multiscalar-tensor gravity

David S. Pereira*

  • *Contact author: djpereira@ciencias.ulisboa.pt

Phys. Rev. D 114, 024041 – Published 16 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hjgp-x561

Abstract

We formulate a first-order thermodynamic description of Jordan-frame tensor-multiscalar gravity. From the Einstein-like field equations we obtain the exact covariant 1+3 decomposition of the geometric sector and write it as an effective imperfect fluid. The thermodynamic interpretation is understood in the first-order Eckart sense: the effective temperature, conductivity, entropy current, and entropy production are meaningful only on branches where the geometric dissipative variables satisfy the appropriate matching and integrability conditions. In a generic frame, the heat flux admits the exact decomposition qa(g)=χ(aa+Wa), with χ=F˙/(8πF) and with Wa encoding the residual temperature-gradient sector. In the F-comoving frame this gives the inertial variable χFKFTF together with a generally nonvanishing spatial contribution Wa(F), sourced by scalar directions not aligned with the coupling. Thus the multifield thermal description is not generically reducible to a single KT-type quantity. We derive transport equations for χF, for the field-space thermal vector χA and covector χA, and for the residual gradient sector. We also introduce the diagnostics Dχ=χAχA and Dgrad=BABDa(F)ϕAD(F)aϕB. Their interpretation depends on the kinetic matrix BAB: they are canonical contractions when BAB is nondegenerate, but become non-negative normlike diagnostics only when BAB is positive definite; if BAB is degenerate, no model-independent inverse field-space metric or full scalar norm is available without extra structure. With this qualification, these diagnostics show that freezing the effective coupling is, in general, weaker than full relaxation to the GR sector. Finally, we construct the entropy current and entropy production in the coupling frame, state the assumptions required for non-negative entropy production, and show that homogeneous cosmology suppresses the spatial sector while retaining nontrivial timelike multiscalar thermal dynamics.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. C. M. Will, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
  2. E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi, T. Baker et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 243001 (2015).
  3. T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Phys. Rep. 513, 1 (2012).
  4. Y. Akrami et al. (CANTATA Collaboration), Modified Gravity and Cosmology. An Update by the CANTATA Network, edited by E. N. Saridakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. Vargas Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltrán Jiménez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo (Springer, New York, 2021).
  5. E. Di Valentino et al. (CosmoVerse Network Collaboration), Phys. Dark Universe 49, 101965 (2025).
  6. C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961).
  7. G. W. Horndeski, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363 (1974).
  8. V. Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity (Springer, Dordrecht, 2004).
  9. T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Classical Quantum Gravity 9, 2093 (1992).
  10. A. L. Berkin and R. W. Hellings, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6442 (1994).
  11. M. Graña, Phys. Rep. 423, 91 (2006).
  12. A. A. Starobinsky, S. Tsujikawa, and J. Yokoyama, Nucl. Phys. B610, 383 (2001).
  13. D. Wands, Lect. Notes Phys. 738, 275 (2008).
  14. C. T. Byrnes and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 74, 043529 (2006).
  15. D. I. Kaiser, E. A. Mazenc, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D 87, 064004 (2013).
  16. D. I. Kaiser and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011302 (2014).
  17. S. Karamitsos and A. Pilaftsis, Nucl. Phys. B927, 219 (2018).
  18. M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023526 (2018).
  19. M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023527 (2018).
  20. M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023528 (2018).
  21. R. Nguyen, J. van de Vis, E. I. Sfakianakis, J. T. Giblin, and D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 171301 (2019).
  22. P. Christodoulidis, R. Rosati, and E. I. Sfakianakis, arXiv:2504.12406.
  23. K. Bolshakova and S. Chervon, Nonlinear World 22, 91 (2024), arXiv:2501.01948.
  24. P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, and A. Smith, arXiv:2603.13986.
  25. Y. Akrami, M. Sasaki, A. R. Solomon, and V. Vardanyan, Phys. Lett. B 819, 136427 (2021).
  26. A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2024) 058.
  27. A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 023.
  28. A. Smith, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1062 (2025).
  29. D. Gallego and J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, arXiv:2603.18341.
  30. J. L. Rosa, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124030 (2021).
  31. J. L. Rosa, S. Carloni, J. P. d. S. e. Lemos, and F. S. N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D 95, 124035 (2017).
  32. J. L. Rosa, S. Carloni, and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104056 (2020).
  33. J. L. Rosa and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124076 (2021).
  34. J. L. Rosa, J. P. S. Lemos, and F. S. N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D 98, 064054 (2018).
  35. R. Aliannejadi and Z. Haghani, Iran. J. Astron. Astrophys. 11, 45 (2024).
  36. M. Hohmann, L. Jarv, P. Kuusk, E. Randla, and O. Vilson, Phys. Rev. D 94, 124015 (2016).
  37. O. Schön and D. D. Doneva, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064034 (2022).
  38. C. Gomes, J. L. Rosa, and M. A. S. Pinto, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1359 (2025).
  39. D. S. Pereira, S. Capozziello, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. P. Mimoso, Phys. Rev. D 113, 064055 (2026).
  40. M. Miranda, P.-A. Graham, and V. Faraoni, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 387 (2023).
  41. V. Faraoni and J. Coté, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084019 (2018).
  42. V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Phys. Rev. D 103, L121501 (2021).
  43. V. Faraoni, A. Giusti, and A. Mentrelli, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124031 (2021).
  44. S. Giardino, V. Faraoni, and A. Giusti, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2022) 053.
  45. V. Faraoni, S. Giardino, A. Giusti, and R. Vanderwee, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 24 (2023).
  46. V. Faraoni and J. Houle, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 521 (2023).
  47. S. Giardino and A. Giusti, Ricerche di matematica 74, 43 (2025).
  48. M. Miranda, S. Giardino, A. Giusti, and L. Heisenberg, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124033 (2024).
  49. J. Houle and V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024067 (2024).
  50. V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 211406 (2025).
  51. V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 112, L021504 (2025).
  52. A. Giusti, S. Zentarra, L. Heisenberg, and V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124011 (2022).
  53. V. Faraoni and N. Veilleux, Phys. Rev. D 113, 044030 (2026).
  54. V. Faraoni and S. N. Cattivelli, Phys. Rev. D 113, 044034 (2026).
  55. S. Bhattacharyya and S. SenGupta, Phys. Rev. D 113, 064019 (2026).
  56. L. Järv and S. Karamitsos, arXiv:2604.16094.
  57. C. Eckart, Phys. Rev. 58, 919 (1940).
  58. V. Faraoni, A. Giusti, S. Jose, and S. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024049 (2022).
  59. W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D 31, 725 (1985).
  60. R. Maartens, arXiv:astro-ph/9609119.
  61. N. Banerjee, A. Giusti, V. Faraoni, L. Gallerani, and A. Maltais-Gosselin, arXiv:2605.24133.
  62. D. S. Pereira and J. P. Mimoso, Phys. Rev. D 113, 084021 (2026).
  63. C. G. Tsagas, A. Challinor, and R. Maartens, Phys. Rep. 465, 61 (2008).
  64. G. F. R. Ellis, Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Fermi 47, 104 (1971).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation