- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Obstructions to traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac theory

Robert J. Weinbaum*

  • Leinweber Institute for Theoretical Physics, Enrico Fermi Institute, and Department of Physics The University of Chicago 933 East 56th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

  • *Contact author: rweinbaum@uchicago.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 084004 – Published 5 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g89c-gqyf

Abstract

Traversable wormholes are among the most striking hypothetical solutions of general relativity, but, under standard global assumptions, they require matter that violates the averaged null energy condition (ANEC). A possible candidate for such matter is the Dirac field. Several recent works have claimed traversable wormhole solutions of the classical Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell system, but these works did not properly take into account that single-particle states do not self-interact electromagnetically and that the mode functions of single-particle states are of positive frequency. In this paper, we show that classical, positive-frequency Dirac fields on certain fixed wormhole geometries can violate ANEC, so they are indeed candidates for sourcing traversable wormholes. We then numerically search for static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat traversable wormhole geometries sourced by Dirac fields of a definite frequency ω>0, angular momentum quantum number ℓ, and definite parity. We find “partial-wormhole solutions”, describing a regular wormhole throat with correct asymptotics at one end of the wormhole, but we find that these solutions cannot be continued to a second asymptotically flat end. In the case of reflection-symmetric wormholes, we perform an additional search where we do not assume that the Dirac solution has a definite parity. In this case, after an extensive scan of throat-forming asymptotic data, we find that the conditions necessary for a reflection-symmetric wormhole throat cannot be obtained. Taken together, these results strongly support that the Einstein-Dirac system does not admit traversable wormhole solutions when sourced by a physically meaningful Dirac field.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. A. Einstein and N. Rosen, The particle problem in the general theory of relativity, Phys. Rev. 48, 73 (1935).
  2. M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988).
  3. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 781 (2013).
  4. C. Sagan, Contact (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1985).
  5. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
  6. G. J. Galloway, On the topology of the domain of outer communication, Classical Quantum Gravity 12, L99 (1995).
  7. J. Maldacena, A. Milekhin, and F. Popov, Traversable wormholes in four dimensions, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 155016 (2023).
  8. H. G. Ellis, Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973).
  9. M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988).
  10. M. Visser, Traversable wormholes: Some simple examples, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3182 (1989).
  11. J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo, C. Knoll, and E. Radu, Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 101102 (2021).
  12. D. L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran, R. M. Wald, and R. J. Weinbaum, Blázquez-Salcedo–Knoll–Radu wormholes are not solutions to the Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell equations, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124055 (2021).
  13. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Traversable wormholes in general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091104 (2022).
  14. B. Kain, Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell wormholes in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084010 (2023).
  15. R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Space-Time, Vol. 1: Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).
  16. R. Geroch, A. Held, and R. Penrose, A space-time calculus based on pairs of null directions, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 874 (1973).
  17. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995), Chap. 3, pp. 35–76.
  18. P. Collas and D. Klein, The Dirac Equation in Curved Spacetime: A Guide for Calculations, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, Cham, 2019).
  19. D. Tong, Quantum Field Theory, University of Cambridge Lecture Notes (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2006), Sec. 4. 6, “Symmetries and Conserved Currents,” https://davidtong.org/pdfs/teaching/quantum-field-theory/qft.pdf.
  20. R. Haag, Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, 2nd ed., Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1996).
  21. E. P. Wigner, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, Ann. Math. 40, 149 (1939).
  22. R. M. Wald, D. L. Danielson, and G. Satishchandran (to be published).
  23. P. R. Auvil and L. M. Brown, The relativistic hydrogen atom: A simple solution, Am. J. Phys. 46, 679 (1978).
  24. S. Weinberg, Bound states in external fields, in The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I: Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995). Chap. 14
  25. R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
  26. E.-A. Kontou and K. Sanders, Energy Conditions in General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 193001 (2020).
  27. N. Graham and K. D. Olum, Achronal averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064001 (2007).
  28. M. Visser, Gravitational vacuum polarization II: Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5116 (1996).
  29. R. M. Wald and U. Yurtsever, General proof of the averaged null energy condition for a massless scalar field in two-dimensional curved spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 44, 403 (1991).
  30. M. Visser, Scale anomalies imply violation of the averaged null energy condition, Phys. Lett. B 349, 443 (1995).
  31. M. Alcubierre, The Dirac equation in general relativity and the 3+1 formalism, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 57, 122 (2025), see Sec. IX. 4, “Spherically Symmetric Solutions”.
  32. L. N. Trefethen, Spectral Methods in MATLAB, Software, Environments, and Tools (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2000).
  33. J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2001).
  34. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. IV: Analysis of Operators (Academic Press, New York, 1978).
  35. R. Schoen and S.-T. Yau, On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 65, 45 (1979).
  36. R. Schoen and S.-T. Yau, Proof of the positive mass theorem. II, Commun. Math. Phys. 79, 231 (1981).
  37. E. Witten, A new proof of the positive energy theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 80, 381 (1981).
  38. S. A. Hayward, Gravitational energy in spherical symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1938 (1996).
  39. P. Virtanen et al., scipy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  40. J. R. Dormand and P. J. Prince, A family of embedded Runge–Kutta formulae, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 6, 19 (1980).
  41. C. Cartis, J. Fiala, B. Marteau, and L. Roberts, Improving the flexibility and robustness of model-based derivative-free optimization solvers, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 45, 32 (2019).
  42. J. N. Goldberg, A. J. Macfarlane, E. T. Newman, F. Rohrlich, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Spin-s spherical harmonics and ð, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 2155 (1967).
  43. F. P. Schuller, Application: Spin structures—Lecture 27, Lecture 27 of Geometrical Anatomy of Theoretical Physics, YouTube video (2015) (published September 21, 2015), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Way8FfcMpf0.
  44. R. Geroch, Spinor structure of space-times in general relativity. I, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 1739 (1968).
  45. M. Berg, C. DeWitt-Morette, S. Gwo, and E. Kramer, The Pin groups in physics: C, P, and T, Rev. Math. Phys. 13, 953 (2001).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 084004– Published 5 October, 2026
  • Received 28 July 2026
  • Accepted 31 August 2026
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation