Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Low viscosity relatively thick twisted disk in a supermassive binary black hole as a potential model of OJ 287

Viacheslav V. Zhuravlev*

Pavel B. Ivanov

  • *Contact author: v.jouravlev@gmail.com
  • Contact author: pavel000astrophysics@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 113, 123027 – Published 10 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g635-y8vr

Abstract

In this paper we consider twisted accretion disks in supermassive binary black holes by analytical and numerical means. It is assumed that the disk is orbiting around the more massive rotating component and that the disk rings are inclined with respect to the orbital plane. We use orbital parameters of the binary, which are often employed in the so-called precessing massive (PM) model of the activity of the well-known blazar OJ 287. In particular, the orbit is assumed to have a large eccentricity around 0.7, and the ratio of the mass of the secondary component to the primary is around 102. Unlike our previous investigation of a similar problem, here we consider disks with both small and relatively large relative thicknesses δ=h/r, where h is the disk’s height at a typical radius r, as well as a range of values of the viscosity parameter, α, including the cases when αδ. The influence of the secondary black hole on the disk is treated using the formalism proposed by us elsewhere, which is based on the double averaging procedure of the secondary’s gravitational field. Similar to our previous results, we find that the twisted disk relaxes relatively quickly to a quasistationary state in the frame precessing with the Lense-Thirring frequency of the orbit. However, its shape is qualitatively different from that corresponding to the case of δ=103 and α=0.1 considered in our previous work. When δ103 the shape of the disk of any viscosity is largely determined by the resonance between a forcing frequency associated with the presence of the secondary and the Lense-Thirring frequency of a particular disk ring calculated in the precessing frame. In addition to the effect determining the shape of the α=0.1 disk considered by us earlier, we find the new effect of the generation of a twisting spiral wave near the resonance in a disk with α2×102. We propose an analytic theory, which is in quite good agreement with our numerical results. For all cases, the typical disk’s inclinations with respect to the equatorial plane are of the order of or larger than the orbital inclination. This leads to multiple crossings of the orbit with the disk per one orbital period, which contradicts the PM model, where only two crossings per orbital period are required. When δ0.1, a typical disk’s inclination within the orbit of the binary turns out to be smaller than that of the orbit. We provide a qualitative analytical analysis, which confirms this conclusion. In this case there are only two crossings of the orbit with the disk per one orbital period. On the other hand, qualitative estimates allow us to suggest that the additional heating of the disk gas by the secondary-disk collisions may result in δ0.1. Thus, we suggest that in the framework of the PM model of OJ 287, the disk should be relatively thick, with δ0.1. This could lead to a modification of the theoretical spectrum of the source.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. A. Sillanpaa, S. Haarala, M. J. Valtonen, B. Sundelius, and G. G. Byrd, Astrophys. J. 325, 628 (1988).
  2. H. J. Lehto and M. J. Valtonen, Astrophys. J. 460, 207 (1996).
  3. M. J. Valtonen et al., Nature (London) 452, 851 (2008).
  4. S. Komossa, D. Grupe, A. Kraus, M. A. Gurwell, Z. Haiman, F. K. Liu, A. Tchekhovskoy, L. C. Gallo, M. Berton, R. Blandford, J. L. Gómez, and A. G. Gonzalez, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, L84 (2023).
  5. M. J. Valtonen et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 6143 (2023).
  6. P. B. Ivanov and V. V. Zhuravlev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 528, 337 (2024).
  7. D. N. C. Lin and J. Papaloizou, Astrophys. J. 309, 846 (1986).
  8. P. Goldreich and S. Tremaine, Astrophys. J. 233, 857 (1979).
  9. N. I. Shakura, Astron. Zh. 16, 756 (1973).
  10. N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Astron. Astrophys. 24, 337 (1973), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A%26A....24..337S/abstract.
  11. P. B. Ivanov, I. V. Igumenshchev, and I. D. Novikov, Astrophys. J. 507, 131 (1998).
  12. M. A. Abramowicz, B. Czerny, J. P. Lasota, and E. Szuszkiewicz, Astrophys. J. 332, 646 (1988).
  13. O. Blaes, Y.-F. Jiang, J.-P. Lasota, and G. Lipunova, Space Sci. Rev. 221, 120 (2025).
  14. J. C. B. Papaloizou and J. E. Pringle, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 202, 1181 (1983).
  15. P. B. Ivanov and A. F. Illarionov, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 285, 394 (1997).
  16. M. Demianski and P. B. Ivanov, Astron. Astrophys. 324, 829 (1997), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A%26A...324..829D/abstract.
  17. V. V. Zhuravlev and P. B. Ivanov, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 2122 (2011).
  18. I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), edited by C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt (Gordon and Breach, Paris, 1973), pp. 343–450.
  19. D. Morales Teixeira, P. C. Fragile, V. V. Zhuravlev, and P. B. Ivanov, Astrophys. J. 796, 103 (2014).
  20. V. V. Zhuravlev, P. B. Ivanov, P. C. Fragile, and D. Morales Teixeira, Astrophys. J. 796, 104 (2014).
  21. P. B. Ivanov, V. V. Zhuravlev, and J. C. B. Papaloizou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 3470 (2018).
  22. D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J. 191, 499 (1974).
  23. J. J. Zanazzi and D. Lai, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 603 (2018).
  24. We note that the latter dependency is caused by our requirement that the disk gas in the vicinity of the crossing points is removed from the system and does not contribute to the averaged torque exerted by the binary on the disk.

  25. See, however, the additional discussion of effects caused by Ω2 below.

  26. J. D. Larwood, R. P. Nelson, J. C. B. Papaloizou, and C. Terquem, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 597 (1996).
  27. J. D. Larwood and J. C. B. Papaloizou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 285, 288 (1997).
  28. We note that the auxiliary variable A has a simple physical meaning. It may be shown that, in the linear approach, a twisted disk consists of ellipses with a small eccentricity. A value of the eccentricity is an odd function of the disk height. Note that A determines this value as well as the orientation of the major axes (see Refs. [15, 16]).

  29. Reference [6] used Ω^1 to represent the time-independent average value of Ω1.

  30. It corresponds to the requirement that α<χ2/5δ4/5 (see Ref. [15]).

  31. We note that Eq. (37) of Ref. [15] contains a misprint, the factor y (denoted as y2 in [15]) should be in the power 3/5 instead of the power 3/2 in [15].

  32. We note that these functions are solutions of an inhomogeneous Airy equation.

  33. Reference [6] used Ω* instead of Ωres. Note that there is a misprint in their Eq. (58), where the minus sign should be absent in front of Ω*. This misprint does not propagate further in the text.

  34. F. Olver, D. Lozier, R. Boisvert, and C. Clark, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  35. Note that when Ωres<0 this condition is reversed.

  36. We note that this constant is expected to be model dependent. However, we believe that using a different relativistic model will not change our qualitative conclusions.

  37. It is interesting to note that there is another well-pronounced peak in the spectrum of the (dn) model corresponding to a period that is 2 times smaller, π/(2ΩEb).

  38. G. I. Ogilvie and H. N. Latter, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 433, 2403 (2013).
  39. L. E. Held and G. I. Ogilvie, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 546, stag245 (2026).
  40. P. C. Fragile and O. M. Blaes, Astrophys. J. 687, 757 (2008).
  41. P. B. Ivanov, A. G. Polnarev, and P. Saha, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 358, 1361 (2005).
  42. We follow Ref. [6], who argued that, in the case of OJ 287, these collisions do not result in the formation of a gap or some cavity in the disk. This is related to a relatively fast orbital evolution of the binary black hole due to the emission of gravitational waves. Thus, Σ represents some typical disk density at the radii of order the binary semimajor axis.

  43. S. M. Ressler, L. Combi, B. Ripperda, and X. Li, Astrophys. J. Lett. 993, L22 (2025).
  44. P. B. Ivanov, E. V. Mikheeva, V. N. Lukash, A. M. Malinovsky, S. V. Chernov, A. S. Andrianov, V. I. Kostenko, and S. F. Likhachev, Phys. Usp. 62, 423 (2019).
  45. M. J. Valtonen, L. Dey, A. Gopakumar, S. Zola, S. Komossa, T. Pursimo, J. L. Gomez, R. Hudec, H. Jermak, and A. V. Berdyugin, Galaxies 10, 1 (2021).
  46. N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 175, 613 (1976).
  47. J. Ross, H. N. Latter, and M. Tehranchi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 2401 (2017).
  48. Note that such a short timescale of orbital evolution presents a difficulty for a theory of formation of systems with the parameters appropriate for the PM model of OJ 287. Indeed, since the evolution timescale is so short, a number of such systems observed in the present time are expected to be quite small.

  49. It is interesting to note that such a spiral wave survives until the rather high viscosity αδ. This makes it different from the known radial oscillations of the disk tilt discovered by Ref. [15], which are suppressed already at αδ.

  50. W. Kley and R. P. Nelson, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 211 (2012).
  51. S. Paardekooper, R. Dong, P. Duffell, J. Fung, F. S. Masset, G. Ogilvie, and H. Tanaka, in Protostars and Planets VII, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, edited by S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, and M. Tamura (2023), p. 685, ISBN: [Amazon][WorldCat]; arXiv:2203.09595.
  52. R. Nealon, E. Ragusa, D. Gerosa, G. Rosotti, and R. Barbieri, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 5608 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation