Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Understanding the structure of nucleon excitations from their wavefunctions

Jackson A. Mickley1, Waseem Kamleh1, Derek B. Leinweber1, and Finn M. Stokes1,2

  • 1Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, Department of Physics, Adelaide University, South Australia 5005, Australia
  • 2Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich D-52425, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034519 – Published 24 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fyd3-cqj1

Abstract

Relativistic wavefunctions of nucleon excitations are scrutinized to understand their node structure and the underlying role of local interpolating fields in generating the nucleon spectrum. In addressing quark model perspectives, approximately 4000 propagators are employed on the heaviest PACS-CS ensemble at mπ702MeV. We examine the ground and four lowest-lying excited states at zero momentum for both positive- and negative-parity spectra, where the proton’s d-quark wavefunction is calculated about the two u quarks at the origin. This is achieved using two local interpolating fields that each carry the quantum numbers of the nucleon but with differing spin-flavor structures, one of which vanishes in the nonrelativistic limit. We find that two distinct types of wavefunction nodes are manifest: “superposition nodes” formed through a linear combination of interpolating fields and novel “built-in nodes” that are fundamentally built in to the s-wave Dirac components of an individual interpolating field. These are investigated qualitatively through visualizations in the form of both volume and surface renderings and quantitatively by the calculation of radial wavefunctions. Combined, these findings build a comprehensive picture of the single-particle nucleon spectrum and how its properties derive from fundamental lattice operators.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A relativistic equation for bound-state problems, Phys. Rev. 84, 1232 (1951).
  2. D. S. Roberts, W. Kamleh, and D. B. Leinweber, Wave function of the Roper from lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 725, 164 (2013).
  3. D. S. Roberts, W. Kamleh, and D. B. Leinweber, Nucleon excited state wave functions from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074501 (2014).
  4. S. Aoki et al. (PACS-CS Collaboration), 2+1 flavor lattice QCD toward the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034503 (2009).
  5. M. G. Beckett, B. Joo, C. M. Maynard, D. Pleiter, O. Tatebe, and T. Yoshie, Building the international lattice data grid, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 1208 (2011).
  6. Y. Iwasaki, Renormalization group analysis of lattice theories and improved lattice action. II. Four-dimensional non-Abelian SU(N) gauge model, arXiv:1111.7054.
  7. Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, T. Kaneko, and T. Yoshie, Scaling in SU(3) pure gauge theory with a renormalization-group-improved action, Phys. Rev. D 56, 151 (1997).
  8. B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert, Improved continuum limit lattice action for QCD with Wilson fermions, Nucl. Phys. B259, 572 (1985).
  9. S. Aoki et al., (CP-PACS, JLQCD), Nonperturbative O(a) improvement of the Wilson quark action with the renormalization-group-improved gauge action using the Schrödinger functional method, Phys. Rev. D 73, 034501 (2006).
  10. Y. Chung, H. G. Dosch, M. Kremer, and D. Schall, Baryon sum rules and chiral symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B197, 55 (1982).
  11. D. Brommel, P. Crompton, C. Gattringer, L. Y. Glozman, C. B. Lang, S. Schaefer, and A. Schafer (Bern-Graz-Regensburg Collaboration), Excited nucleons with chirally improved fermions, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094513 (2004).
  12. D. B. Leinweber, Nucleon properties from unconventional interpolating fields, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6383 (1995).
  13. M. S. Mahbub, A. O. Cais, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Positive-parity excited states of the nucleon in quenched lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 82, 094504 (2010).
  14. M. S. Mahbub, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, P. J. Moran, and A. G. Williams, Structure and flow of the nucleon eigenstates in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094506 (2013).
  15. J. M. Zanotti, D. B. Leinweber, A. G. Williams, J. B. Zhang, W. Melnitchouk, and S. Choe (CSSM Lattice Collaboration), Spin-3/2 nucleon and Δ baryons in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054506 (2003).
  16. B. G. Lasscock, J. N. Hedditch, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, W. Melnitchouk, A. G. Williams, and J. M. Zanotti, Even parity excitations of the nucleon in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 76, 054510 (2007).
  17. M. S. Mahbub, A. O. Cais, W. Kamleh, B. G. Lasscock, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Isolating excited states of the nucleon in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054507 (2009).
  18. M. S. Mahbub, A. O. Cais, W. Kamleh, B. G. Lasscock, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Isolating the roper resonance in lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 679, 418 (2009).
  19. S. Gusken, A study of smearing techniques for hadron correlation functions, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 17, 361 (1990).
  20. C. Michael, Adjoint sources in lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B259, 58 (1985).
  21. M. Luscher and U. Wolff, How to calculate the elastic scattering matrix in two-dimensional quantum field theories by numerical simulation, Nucl. Phys. B339, 222 (1990).
  22. M. S. Mahbub, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, P. J. Moran, and A. G. Williams (CSSM Lattice), Roper resonance in 2+1 flavor QCD, Phys. Lett. B 707, 389 (2012).
  23. T. Draper, R. M. Woloshyn, W. Wilcox, and K.-F. Liu, Electromagnetic form factors of hadrons, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 9, 175 (1989).
  24. C. D. Abell, D. B. Leinweber, Z.-W. Liu, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Low-lying odd-parity nucleon resonances as quark-model-like states, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094519 (2023).
  25. W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, Z.-w. Liu, F. Stokes, A. Thomas, S. Thomas, and J.-j. Wu, Structure of the nucleon and its excitations, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 06019 (2018).
  26. W. Melnitchouk, S. Bilson-Thompson, F. D. R. Bonnet, J. N. Hedditch, F. X. Lee, D. B. Leinweber, A. G. Williams, J. M. Zanotti, and J. B. Zhang, Excited baryons in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114506 (2003).
  27. A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V. F. Weisskopf, New extended model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974).
  28. A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and C. B. Thorn, Baryon structure in the bag theory, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2599 (1974).
  29. C. L. Critchfield, Scalar binding of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 12, 923 (1975).
  30. C. L. Critchfield, Scalar potentials in the Dirac equation, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 17, 261 (1976).
  31. D. W. Rein, Low-energy properties of a relativistic quark model with linear scalar potential, Nuovo Cimento A 38, 19 (1977).
  32. B. Ram and R. Halasa, Dirac equation with a quadratic scalar potential—are quarks confined?, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 26, 551 (1979).
  33. B. Ram, Comments on the Dirac equation with a quadratic scalar potential, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 28, 476 (1980).
  34. B. Ram and M. Arafah, Bound-state Dirac eigenvalues for scalar potentials, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 30, 5 (1981).
  35. V. P. Iyer and L. K. Sharma, Scalar potentials in the Dirac equation and quark confinement, Phys. Lett. B 102, 154 (1981).
  36. F. Ravndal, A harmonic quark bag model, Phys. Lett. 113B, 57 (1982).
  37. R.-k. Su and Z.-Q. Ma, The confinement properties for Dirac equation with the scalar like and vector like potentials, J. Phys. A 19, 1739 (1986).
  38. F. M. Stokes, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, M. S. Mahbub, B. J. Menadue, and B. J. Owen, Parity-expanded variational analysis for nonzero momentum, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114506 (2015).
  39. G. ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nucl. Phys. B138, 1 (1978).
  40. G. ’t Hooft, A property of electric and magnetic flux in non-Abelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B153, 141 (1979).
  41. H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, A quantum liquid model for the QCD vacuum: Gauge and rotational invariance of domained and quantized homogeneous color fields, Nucl. Phys. B160, 380 (1979).
  42. J. Greensite, The confinement problem in lattice gauge theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 1 (2003).
  43. J. Greensite, Confinement from center vortices: A review of old and new results, EPJ Web Conf. 137, 01009 (2017).
  44. E.-A. O’Malley, W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, and P. Moran, SU(3) centre vortices underpin confinement and dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054503 (2012).
  45. A. Trewartha, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Evidence that centre vortices underpin dynamical chiral symmetry breaking in SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B 747, 373 (2015).
  46. A. Trewartha, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Centre vortex removal restores chiral symmetry, J. Phys. G 44, 125002 (2017).
  47. W. Kamleh, Evolving the COLA software library, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 339. [arXiv:2302.00850].
  48. J. A. Mickley, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, and F. M. Stokes, Dataset for “Understanding the structure of nucleon excitations from their wavefunctions” (1.0.0), 10.5281/zenodo.19587922 (2026).
  49. JLDG, Japan Lattice Data Grid (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation