Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Constraints on vectorlike top dipole interactions from top-associated photon measurements at the LHC

M. Sahraei*, Y. Hosseini†, and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi‡

  • *Contact author: msahraei@ipm.ir
  • †Contact author: yhosseini@ipm.ir
  • ‡Contact author: mojtaba@ipm.ir

Phys. Rev. D 114, 095017 – Published 6 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dbn4-jjh5

Abstract

Precision measurements of top-quark production with energetic photons provide a complementary probe of vectorlike quarks with nonstandard radiative decays. We reinterpret the CMS differential tt¯γ measurement and the ATLAS fiducial tt¯γγ cross section to constrain the electromagnetic and chromomagnetic transition interactions of a charge-2/3 vectorlike top partner, T. We consider effective interactions written in terms of physical fields after electroweak symmetry breaking, retaining only the decays T→tγ and T→tg. The CMS signal includes both the mixed (tγ)(tg) topology and double-radiative tt¯γγ events entering the exactly-one-photon fiducial region, while the ATLAS rate is interpreted using a signal-specific detector-response transfer factor. Signal uncertainties are included, and the interpretation is restricted point by point to the domain satisfying the effective field theory and narrow-width requirements. Denoting the electromagnetic and chromomagnetic transition coefficients by ctγ and ctg, respectively, we find that, for ctg=1.0×10−5  GeV−1 and mT=500  GeV, the observed Run 2 exclusions at 95% confidence level extend down to ctγ≃4.7×10−7  GeV−1 for CMS and 2.3×10−6  GeV−1 for ATLAS within the valid domain. At mT=1000  GeV, the corresponding values are 2.1×10−6 and 8.5×10−6  GeV−1. Projections to the HL-LHC indicate improved sensitivity to these radiative transition interactions. These results establish top-associated photon measurements as complementary probes of radiative top-partner interactions beyond searches targeting conventional decay modes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. D. B. Kaplan, H. Georgi, and S. Dimopoulos, Phys. Lett. 136B, 187 (1984).
  2. R. Contino, Y. Nomura, and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B671, 148 (2003).
  3. N. Vignaroli, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 158.
  4. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
  5. I. Antoniadis, Phys. Lett. B 246, 377 (1990).
  6. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998).
  7. M. Schmaltz and D. Tucker-Smith, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 229 (2005).
  8. A. Banerjee et al., SciPost Phys. Core 7, 079 (2024).
  9. A. Banerjee et al., arXiv:2203.07270.
  10. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 81, 035004 (2010).
  11. S. P. Martin, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 18, 1 (1998).
  12. M. L. Xiao and J. H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014007 (2014).
  13. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 104.
  14. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 442 (2016).
  15. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 112010 (2018).
  16. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 771, 80 (2017).
  17. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 136.
  18. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 781, 574 (2018).
  19. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 211801 (2018).
  20. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 012.
  21. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 089.
  22. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 779, 82 (2018).
  23. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 020.
  24. G. Cacciapaglia, T. Flacke, M. Park, and M. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 798, 135015 (2019).
  25. A. Bhardwaj, T. Mandal, S. Mitra, and C. Neeraj, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095014 (2022).
  26. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2026) 041.
  27. S. Tong, J. Corcoran, M. Fieg, M. Fenton, and D. Whiteson, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 057.
  28. J. H. Kim and I. M. Lewis, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 095.
  29. H. Alhazmi, J. H. Kim, K. Kong, and I. M. Lewis, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 139.
  30. G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 045.
  31. G. Panico and A. Wulzer, The Composite Nambu–Goldstone Higgs, Lect. Notes Phys., Vol. 913 (Springer, New York, 2016).
  32. F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, and J. Santiago, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2000) 011.
  33. A. Atre, G. Azuelos, M. Carena, T. Han, E. Ozcan, J. Santiago, and G. Unel, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 080.
  34. A. Belyaev, R. S. Chivukula, B. Fuks, E. H. Simmons, and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095024 (2021).
  35. A. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, S. Mitra, T. Samui, and R. K. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 113, 035034 (2026).
  36. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 342 (2025).
  37. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 091.
  38. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 874, 140195 (2026).
  39. M. Buchkremer, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, and L. Panizzi, Nucl. Phys. B876, 376 (2013).
  40. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, and A. Wulzer, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 097.
  41. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, L. Panizzi, N. Gaur, D. Harada, and Y. Okada, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 070.
  42. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, R. Benbrik, S. Heinemeyer, and M. Perez-Victoria, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094010 (2013).
  43. Y. Okada and L. Panizzi, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 364936 (2013).
  44. G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, A. Carvalho, A. Deandrea, T. Flacke, B. Fuks, D. Majumder, and H.-S. Shao, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 005.
  45. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 072008 (2018).
  46. G. Isidori, Y. Nir, and G. Perez, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 355 (2010).
  47. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  48. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  49. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  50. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012).
  51. L. Darmé et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 631 (2023).
  52. R. D. Ball et al., J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 040.
  53. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
  54. C. Bierlich et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 8 (2022).
  55. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  56. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  57. B. Fuks and H.-S. Shao, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 135 (2017).
  58. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (delphes 3 Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  59. A. V. Manohar, Introduction to effective field theories, in Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School, Vol. 108, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020), pp. 47–136.
  60. I. Brivio et al., arXiv:2201.04974.
  61. A. Deandrea, T. Flacke, B. Fuks, L. Panizzi, and H.-S. Shao, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 107; 11 (2022) 028.
  62. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), HEPData (2022), 10.17182/hepdata.113657.v3.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation