- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search

Khun Sang Phukon1,*, Patricia Schmidt1,†, Gonzalo Morras2,3,‡, and Geraint Pratten1,§

  • *Contact author: k.s.phukon@bham.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: P.Schmidt@bham.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: gonzalo.morras@aei.mpg.de
  • §Contact author: g.pratten@bham.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103023 – Published 12 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cmtb-5q4b

Abstract

The neutron star–black hole (NSBH) binary GW200105 was recently found to have significant residual orbital eccentricity at a gravitational-wave frequency of 20 Hz [G. Morras et al., Orbital eccentricity in a neutron star—black hole binary, Astrophys. J. Lett. 1000, L2 (2026)]. The event was originally identified with moderate significance by matched-filter searches that employ noneccentric templates. The neglect of relevant physical effects, such as orbital eccentricity, can severely reduce the sensitivity of the search and, consequently, also the significance of an event candidate. Here, we present a targeted eccentric search for GW200105. The eccentric search identifies GW200105 as the most significant event with a signal-to-noise ratio of 13.4 and a false alarm rate of less than 1 in 1000 years. The best-matching template parameters are consistent with the Bayesian inference result, supporting the interpretation of GW200105 as an NSBH that formed through dynamical mechanisms including hierarchical triples and not via isolated binary evolution.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  2. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  3. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
  4. Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Yamamoto (KAGRA Collaboration), Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043007 (2013).
  5. K. Somiya (KAGRA Collaboration), Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 124007 (2012).
  6. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, arXiv:2508.18082.
  7. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  8. A. H. Nitz, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, S. Wu, M. Schäfer, R. Dhurkunde, and C. D. Capano, 4-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact binary mergers, Astrophys. J. 946, 59 (2023).
  9. S. Olsen, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, J. Roulet, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3a data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043009 (2022).
  10. A. K. Mehta, S. Olsen, D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3b data, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024049 (2025).
  11. E. Capote et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
  12. S. Soni et al. (LIGO Collaboration), LIGO detector characterization in the first half of the fourth observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 085016 (2025).
  13. B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, FINDCHIRP: An algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012).
  14. K. Cannon et al., Toward early-warning detection of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence, Astrophys. J. 748, 136 (2012).
  15. T. Adams, D. Buskulic, V. Germain, G. M. Guidi, F. Marion, M. Montani, B. Mours, F. Piergiovanni, and G. Wang, Low-latency analysis pipeline for compact binary coalescences in the advanced gravitational wave detector era, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 175012 (2016).
  16. J. Luan, S. Hooper, L. Wen, and Y. Chen, Towards low-latency real-time detection of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences in the era of advanced detectors, Phys. Rev. D 85, 102002 (2012).
  17. J. Lense and H. Thirring, Ueber den Einfluss der Eigenrotation der Zentralkoerper auf die Bewegung der Planeten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie, Phys. Z. 19, 156 (1918), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1918PhyZ...19..156L/abstract.
  18. P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963).
  19. A. H. Nitz, A. Lenon, and D. A. Brown, Search for eccentric binary neutron star mergers in the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO, Astrophys. J. 890, 1 (2019).
  20. A. H. Nitz and Y.-F. Wang, Search for gravitational waves from the coalescence of subsolar-mass binaries in the first half of Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151101 (2021).
  21. A. H. Nitz and Y.-F. Wang, Search for gravitational waves from the coalescence of sub-solar mass and eccentric compact binaries, Astrophys. J. 915, 54 (2021).
  22. R. Dhurkunde and A. H. Nitz, Search for eccentric NSBH and BNS mergers in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103018 (2025).
  23. C. McIsaac, C. Hoy, and I. Harry, Search technique to observe precessing compact binary mergers in the advanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123016 (2023).
  24. S. Schmidt et al., Searching for gravitational-wave signals from precessing black hole binaries with the GstLAL pipeline, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023038 (2024).
  25. S. Pal and K. R. Nayak, Swarm-intelligent search for gravitational waves from eccentric binary mergers, Phys. Rev. D 110, 042003 (2024).
  26. K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, and G. Pratten, Geometric template bank for the detection of spinning low-mass compact binaries with moderate orbital eccentricity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043040 (2025).
  27. Y.-F. Wang and A. H. Nitz, Search for gravitational waves from eccentric binary black holes with an effective-one-body template, Astrophys. J. 993, 215 (2025).
  28. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Search for eccentric binary black hole mergers with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo during their first and second observing runs, Astrophys. J. 883, 149 (2019).
  29. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, and Virgo Collaborations), Search for eccentric black hole coalescences during the third observing run of LIGO and Virgo, Astrophys. J. 973, 132 (2024).
  30. V. Kalogera, Spin orbit misalignment in close binaries with two compact objects, Astrophys. J. 541, 319 (2000).
  31. J. Samsing, M. MacLeod, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The formation of eccentric compact binary inspirals and the role of gravitational wave emission in binary-single stellar encounters, Astrophys. J. 784, 71 (2014).
  32. C. L. Rodriguez, M. Zevin, C. Pankow, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Illuminating black hole binary formation channels with spins in Advanced LIGO, Astrophys. J. Lett. 832, L2 (2016).
  33. I. Cholis, E. D. Kovetz, Y. Ali-Haïmoud, S. Bird, M. Kamionkowski, J. B. Muñoz, and A. Raccanelli, Orbital eccentricities in primordial black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084013 (2016).
  34. J. Stegmann and J. Klencki, Orbital eccentricity and spin–orbit misalignment are evidence that neutron star–black hole mergers form through triple star evolution, Astrophys. J. Lett. 991, L54 (2025).
  35. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011048 (2023).
  36. G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Orbital eccentricity in a neutron star—black hole binary, Astrophys. J. Lett. 1000, L2 (2026).
  37. M. d. L. Planas, S. Husa, A. Ramos-Buades, and J. Valencia, First eccentric inspiral-merger-ringdown analysis of neutron star-black hole mergers, Astrophys. J. 995, 47 (2025).
  38. A. Jan, B.-J. Tsao, R. O’Shaughnessy, D. Shoemaker, and P. Laguna, GW200105: A detailed study of eccentricity in the neutron star-black hole binary, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024018 (2026).
  39. K. Kacanja, K. Soni, and A. H. Nitz, Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s BNS and NSBH binaries, Phys. Rev. D 112, 122007 (2025).
  40. A. Tiwari, S. A. Bhat, M. A. Shaikh, and S. J. Kapadia, Testing the nature of GW200105 by probing the frequency evolution of eccentricity, Astrophys. J. 995, 48 (2025).
  41. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from two neutron star–black hole coalescences, Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L5 (2021).
  42. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Open data from the third observing run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 267, 29 (2023).
  43. D. Davis et al. (LIGO Collaboration), LIGO detector characterization in the second and third observing runs, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 135014 (2021).
  44. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Virgo detector characterization and data quality during the O3 run, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 185006 (2023).
  45. C. Biwer et al., Validating gravitational-wave detections: The Advanced LIGO hardware injection system, Phys. Rev. D 95, 062002 (2017).
  46. S. A. Usman et al., The pycbc search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 215004 (2016).
  47. A. H. Nitz, T. Dent, T. Dal Canton, S. Fairhurst, and D. A. Brown, Detecting binary compact-object mergers with gravitational waves: Understanding and Improving the sensitivity of the pycbc search, Astrophys. J. 849, 118 (2017).
  48. G. S. Davies, T. Dent, M. Tápai, I. Harry, C. McIsaac, and A. H. Nitz, Extending the pycbc search for gravitational waves from compact binary mergers to a global network, Phys. Rev. D 102, 022004 (2020).
  49. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients, arXiv:2508.18081.
  50. B. Moore, M. Favata, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity inspiralling compact binaries to 3PN order, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124061 (2016).
  51. G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Improved post-Newtonian waveform model for inspiralling precessing-eccentric compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084052 (2025).
  52. P. Ajith et al., Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101 (2011).
  53. M. Favata, C. Kim, K. G. Arun, J. Kim, and H. W. Lee, Constraining the orbital eccentricity of inspiralling compact binary systems with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023003 (2022).
  54. K. G. Arun, A. Buonanno, G. Faye, and E. Ochsner, Higher-order spin effects in the amplitude and phase of gravitational waveforms emitted by inspiraling compact binaries: Ready-to-use gravitational waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 79, 104023 (2009); 84, 049901(E) (2011).
  55. A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084043 (2009).
  56. D. A. Brown, I. Harry, A. Lundgren, and A. H. Nitz, Detecting binary neutron star systems with spin in advanced gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084017 (2012).
  57. I. W. Harry, A. H. Nitz, D. A. Brown, A. P. Lundgren, E. Ochsner, and D. Keppel, Investigating the effect of precession on searches for neutron-star-black-hole binaries with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 89, 024010 (2014).
  58. S. Babak et al., Searching for gravitational waves from binary coalescence, Phys. Rev. D 87, 024033 (2013).
  59. B. Allen, χ2 time-frequency discriminator for gravitational wave detection, Phys. Rev. D 71, 062001 (2005).
  60. S. Mozzon, L. K. Nuttall, A. Lundgren, T. Dent, S. Kumar, and A. H. Nitz, Dynamic normalization for compact binary coalescence searches in non-stationary noise, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 215014 (2020).
  61. A. H. Nitz, T. Dent, G. S. Davies, S. Kumar, C. D. Capano, I. Harry, S. Mozzon, L. Nuttall, A. Lundgren, and M. Tápai, 2-OGC: Open gravitational-wave Catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data, Astrophys. J. 891, 123 (2020).
  62. A. H. Nitz, Distinguishing short duration noise transients in LIGO data to improve the pycbc search for gravitational waves from high mass binary black hole mergers, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 035016 (2018).
  63. R. Biswas et al., Likelihood-ratio ranking of gravitational-wave candidates in a non-Gaussian background, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122008 (2012).
  64. G. S. C. Davies and I. W. Harry, Establishing significance of gravitational-wave signals from a single observatory in the pycbc offline search, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 215012 (2022).
  65. T. Dent and J. Veitch, Optimizing gravitational-wave searches for a population of coalescing binaries: Intrinsic parameters, Phys. Rev. D 89, 062002 (2014).
  66. P. Kumar and T. Dent, Optimized search for a binary black hole merger population in LIGO-Virgo O3 data, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043036 (2024).
  67. R. Essick, P. Godwin, C. Hanna, L. Blackburn, and E. Katsavounidis, iDQ: Statistical inference of non-Gaussian noise with auxiliary degrees of freedom in gravitational-wave detectors, Mach. Learn. 2, 015004 (2020).
  68. V. Tiwari, Estimation of the sensitive volume for gravitational-wave source populations using weighted Monte Carlo integration, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 145009 (2018).
  69. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 93, 122003 (2016).
  70. D. Keppel, Balancing act of template bank construction: Inspiral waveform template banks for gravitational-wave detectors and optimizations at fixed computational cost, Phys. Rev. D 87, 124003 (2013).
  71. R. Essick et al., Compact binary coalescence sensitivity estimates with injection campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 112, 102001 (2025).
  72. M. Zevin, I. M. Romero-Shaw, K. Kremer, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Implications of eccentric observations on binary black hole formation channels, Astrophys. J. Lett. 921, L43 (2021).
  73. https://gwosc.org/.
  74. K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, G. Morrás, and G. Pratten, Data release: Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search (Zenodo, 2026), 10.5281/zenodo.19646205.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103023– Published 12 May, 2026
  • Received 12 December 2025
  • Accepted 1 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation