Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Radiative seesaw model with baryon number violation and upper limit on neutron-antineutron transition time

Rabindra N. Mohapatra1 and Nobuchika Okada2

  • 1Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115007 – Published 3 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/byvx-p48q

Abstract

The minimal scotogenic model where small neutrino masses arise via radiative seesaw, is known to provide a unified framework for neutrino mass and origin of matter via leptogenesis. However if the inflation reheat temperature of the universe is below the sphaleron decoupling temperature, then leptogenesis fails and one way to understand the origin of matter would be to add an effective interaction involving the right-handed neutrino (RHN) N of the form 1Λ2NuRdRdR. This model can lead to observable neutron-antineutron (nn¯) oscillation if N is a Majorana fermion. We show that if RHNs are produced nonthermally, we can get a cosmological upper limit on the transition time τnn¯, which is within the reach of the planned European spallation source high-intensity baryon extraction and measurement/neutron-antineutron experiment. Proton stability is guaranteed by the Z2 invariance, which prevents the appearance of the Dirac mass term for the neutrino.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  2. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  3. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  4. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979).
  5. T. Yanagida, Conf. Proc. C 7902131, 95 (1979).
  6. S. L. Glashow, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61, 687 (1980).
  7. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 315, 305 (2005).
  8. A. Abada, S. Davidson, F. X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2006) 004.
  9. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  10. D. Bodeker and W. Buchmuller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035004 (2021).
  11. G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B 258, 305 (1991).
  12. H. Murayama, H. Suzuki, T. Yanagida, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1912 (1993).
  13. A. Ghoshal, R. Samanta, and G. White, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035019 (2023).
  14. X. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 147.
  15. Z. j. Tao, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5693 (1996).
  16. E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 73, 077301 (2006).
  17. R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, and V. S. Rychkov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 015007 (2006).
  18. N. G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 18, 2574 (1978).
  19. S. Kashiwase and D. Suematsu, Phys. Rev. D 86, 053001 (2012).
  20. T. Hugle, M. Platscher, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023020 (2018).
  21. D. Borah, P. S. B. Dev, and A. Kumar, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055012 (2019).
  22. L. Sarma, P. Das, and M. K. Das, Nucl. Phys. B963, 115300 (2021).
  23. J. Racker, Phys. Rev. D 111, L081301 (2025).
  24. I. M. Ávila, A. Karan, S. Mandal, S. Sadhukhan, and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rep. 1173, 1 (2026).
  25. P. S. B. Dev and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 92, 016007 (2015).
  26. H. Davoudiasl and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 92, 016005 (2015).
  27. Christophe Grojean, Bibhushan Shakya, James D. Wells, and Zhengkang Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 171801 (2018).
  28. V. Kuzmin, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 12, 335 (1970); [JETP Lett. 12, 228 (1970)].
  29. Rabindra N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1316 (1980); 44, 1643(E) (1980).
  30. K. S. Babu, R. N. Mohapatra, and S. Nasri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 131301 (2006).
  31. K. S. Babu, P. S. Bhupal Dev, E. C. F. S. Fortes, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115019 (2013).
  32. N. Okada, M. U. Rehman, and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D 82, 043502 (2010).
  33. E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson, and J. Edsjo, Phys. Rev. D 79, 035013 (2009).
  34. A. Ilnicka, M. Krawczyk, and T. Robens, Phys. Rev. D 93, 055026 (2016).
  35. J. Lahiri, T. Robens, and K. Rolbiecki, arXiv:2511.23133.
  36. A. Pierce and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2007) 026.
  37. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rep. 1116, 261 (2025).
  38. D. Chowdhury and O. Eberhardt, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 052.
  39. F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B 659, 703 (2008).
  40. E. Rinaldi, S. Syritsyn, M. L. Wagman, M. I. Buchoff, C. Schroeder, and J. Wasem, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074510 (2019).
  41. S. Rao and R. Shrock, Phys. Lett. 116B, 238 (1982).
  42. M. Baldo-Ceolin et al., Z. Phys. C 63, 409 (1994).
  43. K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 012008 (2021).
  44. K. Fridell, J. Harz, and C. Hati, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 185.
  45. V. Santoro, D. Milstead, P. Fierlinger, W. M. Snow, J. Amaral, J. Barrow, M. Bartis, P. Bentley, L. Björk, G. Brooijmans et al., J. Phys. G 52, 040501 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation