- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Massive cold hybrid stars in a modified Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model

Sk Md Adil Imam1,2,*, Pedro Costa2,†, Mariana Dutra3,‡, Odilon Lourenço3,§, Renan Pereira2, and Constança Providência2,∥

  • *Contact author: adil.imam@unab.cl
  • †Contact author: pcosta@uc.pt
  • ‡Contact author: marianad@ita.br
  • §Contact author: odilon@ita.br
  • ∥Contact author: cp@uc.pt
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 083016 – Published 6 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bn23-n899

Abstract

We propose a modified Polyakov-loop Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model in which the Polyakov potential is given by an explicit dependence on the quark chemical potential, allowing it to remain finite at zero temperature and thus to describe the confinement-deconfinement transition in cold dense matter. Combining this modified quark sector with hadronic equations of state via a Maxwell construction, we find that, depending on the model parameters, the equation of state can exhibit either two phase transitions, from hadronic matter to confined quark matter and subsequently to deconfined quark matter, or a single transition directly from hadronic to deconfined quark matter or from hadronic to confined quark matter. Stable massive cold hybrid stars with only confined and/or deconfined quark phase are obtained. We systematically examine how the parameters of the modified Polyakov potential and the quark vector interactions control the location of these transitions, and find that repulsive vector interactions are essential to obtain a stable quark core. Hybrid stars with confined and/or a deconfined core can reach maximum masses above 2M⊙, provided a sufficiently stiff hadronic equation of state is used at low density. In the core of the maximum-mass configurations, the speed of sound shows variations at finite baryon densities, with cs2(μ) departing from the asymptotic conformal value cs2=1/3 in confined core stars. These variations serve as a diagnostic of the equation-of-state stiffness while remaining fully consistent with causality and thermodynamic stability. This work establishes the qualitative role of each model parameter in shaping hybrid-star structure.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (90)

  1. L. Bonanno and A. Sedrakian, Astron. Astrophys. 539, A16 (2012).
  2. S. Benic, D. Blaschke, D. E. Alvarez-Castillo, T. Fischer, and S. Typel, Astron. Astrophys. 577, A40 (2015).
  3. T. Miyatsu, M.-K. Cheoun, and K. Saito, Astrophys. J. 813, 135 (2015).
  4. T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023021 (2020).
  5. T. Malik and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063024 (2022).
  6. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), https://www.bnl.gov/rhic/ (2025), accessed: 2026-06-03.
  7. CERN, Large hadron collider, https://home.cern/science/accelerators/large-hadron-collider (2026), accessed: 2026-06-03.
  8. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), https://www.bnl.gov/eic/ (2026), accessed: 2026-06-03.
  9. GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, FAIR—Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research, https://www.gsi.de/en/researchaccelerators/fair (2026), accessed: 2026-06-03.
  10. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, NICA: Nuclotron-based Ion Collider Facility, https://nica.jinr.ru/ (2026), accessed: 2026-06-03.
  11. P. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts, and J. Hessels, Nature (London) 467, 1081 (2010).
  12. H. T. Cromartie et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), Nat. Astron. 4, 72 (2019).
  13. J. Antoniadis et al., Science 340, 1233232 (2013).
  14. E. Fonseca et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L12 (2021).
  15. D. Choudhury et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 971, L20 (2024).
  16. L. Mauviard et al., Astrophys. J. 995, 60 (2025).
  17. T. E. Riley et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L21 (2019).
  18. M. C. Miller et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L24 (2019).
  19. S. Vinciguerra, T. Salmi, A. L. Watts, D. Choudhury, T. E. Riley, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, Y. Kini, S. Guillot, D. Chakrabarty, W. C. G. Ho, D. Huppenkothen, S. M. Morsink, Z. Wadiasingh, and M. T. Wolff, Astrophys. J. 961, 62 (2024).
  20. T. E. Riley et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L27 (2021).
  21. M. C. Miller et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021).
  22. T. Salmi, D. Choudhury, Y. Kini, T. E. Riley, S. Vinciguerra, A. L. Watts, M. T. Wolff, Z. Arzoumanian, S. Bogdanov, D. Chakrabarty, K. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, D. Huppenkothen, R. M. Ludlam, S. M. Morsink, and P. S. Ray, Astrophys. J. 974, 294 (2024).
  23. A. J. Dittmann, M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, I. M. Holt, C. Chirenti, M. T. Wolff, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, S. M. Morsink, Z. Arzoumanian, and K. C. Gendreau, Astrophys. J. 974, 295 (2024).
  24. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
  25. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018).
  26. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophys. J. Lett. 882, L24 (2019).
  27. M. Punturo et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  28. D. Reitze et al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833.
  29. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 494 (1973).
  30. H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. 47B, 365 (1973).
  31. D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973).
  32. M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Schäfer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1455 (2008).
  33. A. Kurkela, P. Romatschke, and A. Vuorinen, Phys. Rev. D 81, 105021 (2010).
  34. O. Komoltsev and A. Kurkela, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202701 (2022).
  35. K. Splittorff and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 031601 (2007).
  36. T. DeGrand, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and J. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2060 (1975).
  37. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  38. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).
  39. M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
  40. U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27, 195 (1991).
  41. S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  42. K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B 591, 277 (2004).
  43. S. Rößner, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 75, 034007 (2007).
  44. C. Ratti, S. Rößner, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, Eur. Phys. J. C 49, 213 (2007).
  45. N. Bratovic, T. Hatsuda, and W. Weise, Phys. Lett. B 719, 131 (2013).
  46. C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014019 (2006).
  47. K. Fukushima, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114028 (2008).
  48. V. A. Dexheimer and S. Schramm, Phys. Rev. C 81, 045201 (2010).
  49. O. A. Mattos, O. Lourenço, and T. Frederico, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1291, 012031 (2019).
  50. O. A. Mattos, T. Frederico, and O. Lourenço, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 24 (2021).
  51. O. A. Mattos, T. Frederico, C. H. Lenzi, M. Dutra, and O. Lourenço, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116001 (2021).
  52. O. Ivanytskyi, M. A. Pérez-García, V. Sagun, and C. Albertus, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103020 (2019).
  53. I. N. Mishustin, L. M. Satarov, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 62, 034901 (2000).
  54. M. Ferreira, R. C. Pereira, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 102, 083030 (2020).
  55. G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8 (1976).
  56. S. Klimt, M. Lutz, U. Vogl, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A516, 429 (1990).
  57. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 1422 (1970).
  58. L. G. Yaffe and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 26, 963 (1982).
  59. S. Rößner, T. Hell, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A814, 118 (2008).
  60. V. Dexheimer and S. Schramm, Nucl. Phys. A827, 579c (2009).
  61. J. Steinheimer, V. Dexheimer, M. Bleicher, H. Petersen, S. Schramm, and H. Stöcker, Phys. Rev. C 81, 044913 (2010).
  62. M. Ferreira, P. Costa, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034006 (2018).
  63. H. Hansen, R. Stiele, and P. Costa, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094001 (2020).
  64. V. Dexheimer, R. O. Gomes, T. Klähn, S. Han, and M. Salinas, Phys. Rev. C 103, 025808 (2021).
  65. P. Costa, M. C. Ruivo, C. A. De Sousa, and H. Hansen, Symmetry 2, 1338 (2010).
  66. S. Ejiri, Y. Iwasaki, and K. Kanaya, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094505 (1998).
  67. G. Boyd, J. Engels, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, C. Legeland, M. Lütgemeier, and B. Petersson, Nucl. Phys. B469, 419 (1996).
  68. O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, and F. Zantow, Phys. Lett. B 543, 41 (2002).
  69. C. S. Fischer, L. Fister, J. Luecker, and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Lett. B 732, 273 (2014).
  70. B.-J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074023 (2007).
  71. H. Abuki, R. Anglani, R. Gatto, G. Nardulli, and M. Ruggieri, Phys. Rev. D 78, 034034 (2008).
  72. G.-y. Shao, Z.-d. Tang, M. Di Toro, M. Colonna, X.-y. Gao, and N. Gao, Phys. Rev. D 94, 014008 (2016).
  73. X.-y. Xin, S.-x. Qin, and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 89, 094012 (2014).
  74. R. Pereira, Chiral transition, and deconfinement in hybrid stars, Master’s thesis, University of Coimbra, 2016.
  75. S. Gupta, X. Luo, B. Mohanty, H. G. Ritter, and N. Xu, Science 332, 1525 (2011).
  76. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
  77. K. Olive, Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  78. T. Schäfer, E. V. Shuryak, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1267 (1995).
  79. T. Hell, K. Kashiwa, and W. Weise, J. Mod. Phys. 04, 644 (2013).
  80. R. Z. Denke and M. B. Pinto, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056008 (2013).
  81. P. Costa, M. Ferreira, D. P. Menezes, J. Moreira, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036012 (2015).
  82. R. C. Pereira, P. Costa, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094001 (2016).
  83. A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, Astrophys. J. 774, 17 (2013).
  84. S. Typel, G. Röpke, T. Klähn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, Phys. Rev. C 81, 015803 (2010).
  85. M. Fortin, M. Oertel, and C. Providência, Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 35, 44 (2018).
  86. C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5647 (2001).
  87. M. Alford, M. Braby, M. Paris, and S. Reddy, Astrophys. J. 629, 969 (2005).
  88. J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, Phys. Rev. 55, 374 (1939).
  89. R. C. Tolman, Phys. Rev. 55, 364 (1939).
  90. M. Albino, T. Malik, M. Ferreira, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 113, 083019 (2026).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 083016– Published 6 October, 2026
  • Received 17 August 2026
  • Accepted 15 September 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation