Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Lorentzian threads and nonlocal computation in holography

Elena Cáceres1, Rafael Carrasco2,*, and Juan F. Pedraza2

  • *Contact author: rafael.carrasco@ift.csic.es

Phys. Rev. D 113, 106024 – Published 22 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bk1l-3ffb

Abstract

Recent advances in holography and quantum gravity have shown that conformal field theories (CFTs) with classical gravity duals can implement nonlocal quantum computation protocols that appear local from the bulk perspective. We examine the extent to which current prescriptions for holographic complexity support this claim, focusing on the complexity=volume (CV) proposal. The reformulation of CV in terms of Lorentzian threads suggests that bulk computations are performed with local gates. However, we find that the original formalism is insufficient when it comes to analyzing the complexity of subsystems and their inequalities. Specifically, standard Lorentzian threads cannot account for the negativity of mutual complexity and its higher-partite generalizations. To address this deficiency, we modify the Lorentzian threads program by introducing multiple flavors of threads. Our analysis reveals that an optimal solution for this new program implies the existence of additional types of gates that enable nonlocal computations in the dual CFT. We give a tentative interpretation of the multiflavor program in terms of Lorentzian hyperthreads, in analogy with the Riemannian case.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  2. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2006) 045.
  3. G. Penington, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 002.
  4. H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes, and J. Sandor, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 025.
  5. K. Ghosh and C. Krishnan, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 119.
  6. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 149.
  7. B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira, and M. Van Raamsdonk, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 155009 (2012).
  8. X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 021601 (2016).
  9. B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk, and J. Sully, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 129.
  10. R. Espíndola, A. Guijosa, and J. F. Pedraza, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 646 (2018).
  11. N. Bao, C. Cao, S. Fischetti, and C. Keeler, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 185002 (2019).
  12. A. Guijosa, Y. D. Olivas, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 118.
  13. S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 066021 (2025).
  14. M. Van Raamsdonk, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 2323 (2010).
  15. B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. D 86, 065007 (2012).
  16. N. Lashkari, M. B. McDermott, and M. Van Raamsdonk, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 195.
  17. T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R. C. Myers, and M. Van Raamsdonk, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 051.
  18. L. Susskind, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 49 (2016).
  19. L. Susskind, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 24 (2016); 64, 44(A) (2016).
  20. J. F. Pedraza, A. Russo, A. Svesko, and Z. Weller-Davies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 271602 (2021).
  21. J. F. Pedraza, A. Russo, A. Svesko, and Z. Weller-Davies, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 093.
  22. S. Chapman, M. P. Heller, H. Marrochio, and F. Pastawski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121602 (2018).
  23. R. Jefferson and R. C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 107.
  24. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014).
  25. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 191301 (2016).
  26. J. Couch, W. Fischler, and P. H. Nguyen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 119.
  27. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi, and A. J. Speranza, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 081602 (2022).
  28. J. F. Pedraza, A. Russo, A. Svesko, and Z. Weller-Davies, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2242010 (2022).
  29. R. Carrasco, J. F. Pedraza, A. Svesko, and Z. Weller-Davies, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 167.
  30. M. Headrick and V. E. Hubeny, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 105012 (2018).
  31. M. Freedman and M. Headrick, Commun. Math. Phys. 352, 407 (2017).
  32. M. Headrick and V. E. Hubeny, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 180.
  33. P. Hayden, M. Headrick, and A. Maloney, Phys. Rev. D 87, 046003 (2013).
  34. N. Bao, S. Nezami, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica, J. Sully, and M. Walter, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 130.
  35. S. X. Cui, P. Hayden, T. He, M. Headrick, B. Stoica, and M. Walter, Commun. Math. Phys. 376, 609 (2019).
  36. V. E. Hubeny, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 068.
  37. C. A. Agón, J. De Boer, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 075.
  38. J. Harper, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 118.
  39. J. Harper, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 239.
  40. C. Akers and P. Rath, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 208.
  41. V. Balasubramanian, M. J. Kang, C. Murdia, and S. F. Ross, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 068.
  42. N. Iizuka and M. Nishida, Phys. Rev. D 112, 026011 (2025).
  43. N. Iizuka, S. Lin, and M. Nishida, arXiv:2504.01625.
  44. N. Iizuka, S. Lin, and M. Nishida, Phys. Rev. D 112, 066014 (2025).
  45. C. A. Agón, M. Headrick, and B. Swingle, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 145.
  46. E. Cáceres, J. Couch, S. Eccles, and W. Fischler, Phys. Rev. D 99, 086016 (2019).
  47. E. Caceres, S. Chapman, J. D. Couch, J. P. Hernandez, R. C. Myers, and S.-M. Ruan, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 012.
  48. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi, and A. J. Speranza, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 154.
  49. R. C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan, Complexity equals (almost) anything, in Proceedings of Gravity, Strings and Fields (Springer, Cham, 2025), 10.1007/978-3-031-91266-5_11.
  50. E. Cáceres, R. Carrasco, V. Patil, J. F. Pedraza, and A. Svesko, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 218.
  51. A. May, G. Penington, and J. Sorce, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 132.
  52. A. May, Quantum 6, 864 (2022).
  53. A. May, J. Sorce, and B. Yoshida, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 153.
  54. K. Dolev and S. Cree, arXiv:2210.13500.
  55. A. May and M. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 079.
  56. J. Harper, M. Headrick, and A. Rolph, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 168.
  57. J. Harper and M. Headrick, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 101.
  58. D.-H. Du, C.-B. Chen, and F.-W. Shu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 140.
  59. N. Bao, A. Chatwin-Davies, J. Pollack, and G. N. Remmen, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 152.
  60. C. A. Agón and M. Mezei, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 167.
  61. C. A. Agón, E. Cáceres, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 193.
  62. Y.-Y. Lin, J.-R. Sun, and Y. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 103, 126002 (2021).
  63. M. Headrick, J. Held, and J. Herman, Commun. Math. Phys. 396, 265 (2022).
  64. C. A. Agón and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 180.
  65. A. Rolph, SciPost Phys. 14, 097 (2023).
  66. M. Mintchev and E. Tonni, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 149.
  67. U. Gürsoy, J. F. Pedraza, and G. P. Planas, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 091.
  68. S. Caggioli, F. Gentile, D. Seminara, and E. Tonni, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 088.
  69. D.-H. Du and J.-R. Sun, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 016.
  70. M. Headrick, S. R. Kasireddy, and A. Rolph, arXiv:2510.22601.
  71. H. Wu and S. Ying, Phys. Rev. D 113, 066006 (2026).
  72. P. K. Das and M. Mahato, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 049.
  73. K. B. Rao and M. B. Rao, Theory of Charges: A Study of Finitely Additive Measures (Academic Press, New York, 1983).
  74. S. Boyd, S. P. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
  75. M. Slater, Lagrange multipliers revisited, in Traces and Emergence of Nonlinear Programming, edited by G. Giorgi and T. H. Kjeldsen (Springer Basel, Basel, 2014), pp. 293–306.
  76. A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 163.
  77. V. Balasubramanian, M. DeCross, A. Kar, and O. Parrikar, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 069.
  78. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 149.
  79. Z. Yang, P. Hayden, and X.-L. Qi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 175.
  80. T. Kohler and T. Cubitt, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 017.
  81. H. Apel, T. Kohler, and T. Cubitt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 052.
  82. E. Caceres, R. Carrasco, and V. Patil, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 010.
  83. F. Speelman, Leibniz Int. Proc. Inf. 61, 9 (2016).
  84. K. Dolev and S. Cree, arXiv:2203.10106.
  85. R. Allerstorfer, H. Buhrman, A. May, F. Speelman, and P. V. Lunel, Quantum 8, 1387 (2024).
  86. V. R. Asadi, E. Culf, and A. May, Leibniz Int. Proc. Inf. 325, 11:1 (2025).
  87. A. Bluhm, S. Höfer, A. May, M. Stasiuk, P. V. Lunel, and H. Yuen, arXiv:2505.23893.
  88. E. Minguzzi, Living Rev. Relativity 22, 1 (2019).
  89. J.-H. Treude and J. D. E. Grant, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 43, 233 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation