Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

de Sitter scalar discrete series: Gupta-Bleuler structure and holography

Maryam Bajalan1,*, Jean-Pierre Gazeau2,3,†, and Hamed Pejhan1,‡

  • *Contact author: maryam.bajalan@math.bas.bg
  • †Contact author: gazeau@apc.in2p3.fr, j.gazeau@uwb.edu.pl
  • ‡Contact author: pejhan@math.bas.bg

Phys. Rev. D 114, 085010 – Published 9 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bh8b-59lg

Abstract

We show that scalar discrete-series unitary irreducible representations (UIRs) Πp,0 (p=1,2,…) of the de Sitter (dS) group SO0(1,4) admit a dS-covariant Krein realization on the dS hyperboloid, endowed with a dS-invariant nondegenerate Klein-Gordon (KG) sesquilinear form, in which the group action is indecomposable and organizes naturally into a Gupta-Bleuler triplet. The positive- and negative-norm sectors are already present in the underlying Krein space, whereas a null sector emerges only at an intermediate stage, where the induced KG form becomes degenerate, and its radical leads canonically to the physical quotient carrying the UIR Πp,0. We further show that suitable limits of the bulk theory at the “future” and “past” conformal boundaries I± give rise to dS-invariant boundary realizations endowed with induced kernel inner products. While the bulk negative-norm sector admits no independent boundary counterpart, the boundary realization retains the physical and gauge structures inherited from the bulk. The resulting boundary module nevertheless remains indecomposable, with its physical quotient carrying the discrete-series representation Πp,0. The antipodal symmetry provides a natural relation between the realizations on I+ and I−, ensuring the consistency of the boundary construction and its geometric interpretation. At the heart of the analysis lies a Fourier-type bulk-boundary transform that provides a dS-covariant identification of the bulk and boundary physical sectors, establishing a one-to-one intertwining correspondence between the bulk and boundary realizations of Πp,0 while preserving reflection positivity.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. E. P. Wigner, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, Ann. Math. 40, 149 (1939).
  2. T. D. Newton and E. P. Wigner, Localized states for elementary systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 400 (1949).
  3. M. Enayati, J.-P. Gazeau, H. Pejhan, and A. Wang, The de Sitter (dS) Group and its Representations, 2nd ed. (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2024).
  4. J.-P. Gazeau, H. Pejhan, and I. Todorov, Massless Representations in Conformal Space and Their de Sitter Restrictions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press), arXiv:2601.18433.
  5. J. Dixmier, Représentations intégrables du groupe de De Sitter, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 89, 9 (1961).
  6. L. H. Thomas, On unitary representations of the group of de Sitter space, Ann. Math. 42, 113 (1941).
  7. T. D. Newton, A note on the representations of the de Sitter group, Ann. Math. 51, 730 (1950).
  8. R. Takahashi, Sur les représentations unitaires des groupes de Lorentz généralisés, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 91, 289 (1963).
  9. C. Martin, Sur certaines représentations locales de l’algèbre de Lie so(4,1) et de l’algèbre de Lie du groupe de Poincaré, Ann. I. H. P.: Phys. Theor. 20, 373 (1974), https://www.numdam.org/item/AIHPA_1974__20_4_373_0.pdf.
  10. U. Ottoson, A classification of the unitary irreducible representations of SO0(N,1), Commun. Math. Phys. 8, 228 (1968).
  11. F. Schwarz, Unitary irreducible representations of the groups SO(n,1), J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 12, 131 (1971)
  12. V. A. Letsios, M. N. Sempé, and G. A. Silva, Spinning fields on Sd and dSd, unitary irreducible representations, and ladder operators, Phys. Rev. D 111, 025018 (2025).
  13. R. L. Lipsman, Group Representations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974).
  14. E. Witten, Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, arXiv:hep-th/0106109.
  15. A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 034.
  16. J. Bros, H. Epstein, and U. Moschella, Analyticity properties and thermal effects for general quantum field theory on de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D 65, 084012 (2002).
  17. J.-P. Gazeau, M. A. del Olmo, and H. Pejhan, A novel holographic framework preserving reflection positivity in dSd spacetime, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138402 (2024).
  18. Z. Sun, A note on the representations of SO(1,d+1), Rev. Math. Phys. 37, 2430007 (2025).
  19. M. Hogervorst, J. Penedones, and K. S. Vaziri, Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 162.
  20. J. Penedones, K. S. Vaziri, and Z. Sun, Hilbert space of quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 111, 045001 (2025).
  21. J. Mickelsson and J. Niederle, Contractions of representations of de Sitter groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 27, 167 (1972).
  22. T. Garidi, E. Huguet, and J. Renaud, de Sitter waves and the zero curvature limit, Phys. Rev. D 67, 124028 (2003).
  23. A. O. Barut and A. Böhm, Reduction of a class of O(4,2) representations with respect to SO(4,1) and SO(3,2), J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 11, 2938 (1970).
  24. G. Mack and I. Todorov, Irreducibility of the ladder representations of U(2,2) when restricted to the Poincaré subgroup, J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 10, 2078 (1969).
  25. G. Mack, All unitary ray representations of the conformal group SU(2,2) with positive energy, Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 1 (1977).
  26. H. Pejhan, M. Enayati, J.-P. Gazeau, and A. Wang, Gupta-Bleuler quantization for linearized gravity in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 100, 066012 (2019).
  27. J. Gibbons, A. Higuchi, and W. C. C. Lima, Infrared problem in the Faddeev-Popov ghost propagator in perturbative quantum gravity in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 103, 065016 (2021).
  28. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  29. A. Higuchi, Symmetric tensor spherical harmonics on the N-sphere and their application to the de Sitter group SO(N,1), J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 28, 1553 (1987).
  30. J. E. Avery and J. S. Avery, Hyperspherical Harmonics and their Physical Applications (World Scientific, Singapore, 2018).
  31. J.-P. Gazeau, P. Siegl, and A. Youssef, Krein spaces in de Sitter quantum theories, SIGMA 6, 23 (2010).
  32. J.-P. Gazeau, J. Renaud, and M. V. Takook, Gupta-Bleuler quantization for minimally coupled scalar fields in de Sitter space, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 1415 (2000).
  33. J.-P. Gazeau and H. Pejhan, Matter-antimatter (a) symmetry in de Sitter Universe, Europhys. Lett. 148, 59001 (2024).
  34. H. Araki, Indecomposable representations with invariant inner product, Commun. Math. Phys. 97, 149 (1985).
  35. D. Pierotti, Some remarks on the Gupta-Bleuler triplet, J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 31, 1862 (1990).
  36. J. Simon, Introduction to the 1-cohomology of Lie groups, in Harmonic Analysis and Representations of Semisimple Lie Groups, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, Vol. 39, edited by P. Trombi (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980), pp. 449–465.
  37. M. Bajalan, J.-P. Gazeau, H. Pejhan, and P. Siegl, Araki cohomology of the de Sitter scalar discrete series (to be published).
  38. J.-P. Gazeau and H. Pejhan, A misleading naming convention: de Sitter ‘tachyonic’ scalar fields, Found. Phys. 55, 8 (2025).
  39. B. Allen, Vacuum states in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 32, 3136 (1985).
  40. B. Allen and A. Folacci, Massless minimally coupled scalar field in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3771 (1987).
  41. J. Bros, H. Epstein, and U. Moschella, Scalar tachyons in the de Sitter universe, Lett. Math. Phys. 93, 203 (2010).
  42. D. Anninos, T. Anous, B. Pethybridge, and G. Şengör, The discreet charm of the discrete series in dS2, J. Phys. A 57, 025401 (2024).
  43. K. Kirstenand and J. Garriga, Massless minimally coupled fields in de Sitter space: O(4)-symmetric states versus de Sitter-invariant vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 48, 567 (1993).
  44. S. D. Bièvre and J. Renaud, Massless Gupta-Bleuler vacuum on the (1+1)-dimensional de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6230 (1998).
  45. V. A. Letsios and S. Vitouladitis, Axions on de Sitter space, arXiv:2606.28858.
  46. F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, editors, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010).
  47. W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and R. P. Soni, Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1966).
  48. L. K. Hua, Harmonic Analysis of Functions of Several Complex Variables in the Classical Domains (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1963).
  49. I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, and L. Moiseevich, Table of Integrals, Series Products (Academic Press, New York, 1980).
  50. W. E. Boyce, R. C. DiPrima, and D. B. Meade, Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 7th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation