- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quasiparticle tunneling in two coupled chiral SYK model

Avik Chakraborty and Manavendra Mahato*

  • *Contact author: manav@iiti.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 126018 – Published 15 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b57b-rxvx

Abstract

The chiral SYK model [Lian et al. The chiral SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 067] is a 1+1-dimensional generalization of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with chiral Majorana fermions and homogeneous random interactions. In the large-N limit, the model admits an exact solution of the two-point function due to its scaling symmetry and exhibits a quantized thermal Hall conductance consistent with that of a 2+1-dimensional gapped topological system. We study two chiral SYK systems coupled by a relevant quadratic interaction that explicitly breaks scaling and time-reversal symmetry. Working in the regime of weak intersystem coupling, we solve the Dyson-Schwinger equations perturbatively and obtain analytic expressions for two-point functions at finite temperature. Unlike the coupled SYK model in 0+1 dimensions, the 1+1-dimensional chiral system does not develop a mass gap, and no thermal phase transition is observed. We show that the leading correction to the thermodynamic free energy is temperature independent, implying that the entropy density remains identical to that of two uncoupled chiral SYK systems. A real-time analysis of the retarded correlator reveals the emergence of massless collective bosonic modes propagating between the two subsystems at zero temperature, signaling quasiparticle tunneling without gap generation. Our results demonstrate a sharp qualitative distinction between relevant deformations of SYK models in zero and one spatial dimensions and highlight the robustness of gapless chiral edge dynamics against explicit scaling symmetry-breaking interactions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/ (2015).
  2. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).
  3. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  4. A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 183.
  5. S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas, and S. Sachdev, Holographic Quantum Matter (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2018).
  6. X.-Y. Song, C.-M. Jian, and L. Balents, Strongly correlated metal built from Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 216601 (2017).
  7. S. Sachdev, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and strange metals, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041025 (2015).
  8. A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 014.
  9. K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS2 holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 111601 (2016).
  10. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional nearly anti-de-Sitter space, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 12C104 (2016).
  11. J. Engelsöy, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verlinde, An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 139.
  12. Y. Gu and A. Kitaev, On the relation between the magnitude and exponent of OTOCs, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 075.
  13. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  14. Y. Gu, X.-L. Qi, and D. Stanford, Local criticality, diffusion and chaos in generalized Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 125.
  15. M. Berkooz, P. Narayan, M. Rozali, and J. Simón, Higher dimensional generalizations of the SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 138.
  16. M. Blake, R. A. Davison, and S. Sachdev, Thermal diffusivity and chaos in metals without quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. D 96, 106008 (2017).
  17. R. A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y. Gu, K. Jensen, and S. Sachdev, Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155131 (2017).
  18. S.-K. Jian and H. Yao, Solvable Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models in higher dimensions: From diffusion to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206602 (2017).
  19. Y. Chen, H. Zhai, and P. Zhang, Tunable quantum chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model coupled to a thermal bath, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 150.
  20. W. Cai, X.-H. Ge, and G.-H. Yang, Diffusion in higher dimensional SYK model with complex fermions, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 076.
  21. P. Zhang and H. Zhai, Topological Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201112 (2018).
  22. G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, Towards a 2d QFT analog of the SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 167.
  23. J. Murugan, D. Stanford, and E. Witten, More on supersymmetric and 2d analogs of the SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 146.
  24. M. Berkooz, P. Narayan, M. Rozali, and J. Simón, Comments on the random Thirring model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 057.
  25. P. Narayan and J. Yoon, SYK-like tensor models on the lattice, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 083.
  26. I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Uncolored random tensors, melon diagrams, and the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D 95, 046004 (2017).
  27. S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, and G. Tarnopolsky, Bosonic tensor models at large N and small ε, Phys. Rev. D 96, 106014 (2017).
  28. B. Lian, S. L. Sondhi, and Z. Yang, The chiral SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 067.
  29. R. B. Laughlin, Quantized Hall conductivity in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5632 (1981).
  30. B. I. Halperin, Quantized Hall conductance, current carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2185 (1982).
  31. F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ‘parity anomaly’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  32. X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085308 (2006).
  33. G. W. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991).
  34. N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two-dimensions with breaking of parity and time reversal symmetries, and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000).
  35. X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  36. A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 321, 2 (2006).
  37. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Diving into traversable wormholes, Fortschr. Phys. 65, 1700034 (2017).
  38. J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi, Eternal traversable wormhole, arXiv:1804.00491.
  39. J. Maldacena and A. Milekhin, SYK wormhole formation in real time, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 258.
  40. Y. D. Lensky and X.-L. Qi, Rescuing a black hole in the large-q coupled SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 116.
  41. P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis, and A. C. Wall, Traversable wormholes via a double trace deformation, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 151.
  42. F. D. M. Haldane, Luttinger liquid theory of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
  43. R. Heidenreich, R. Seiler, and D. Uhlenbrock, The Luttinger model, J. Stat. Phys. 22, 27 (1980).
  44. J. von Delft and H. Schoeller, Bosonization for beginners: Refermionization for experts, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 510, 225 (1998).
  45. C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantized thermal transport in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832 (1997).
  46. DLMF, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15, edited by f. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain.
  47. D. F. Lawden, Elliptic Functions and Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013), Vol. 80.
  48. L. Balents and M. P. Fisher, Chiral surface states in the bulk quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2782 (1996).
  49. J. Naud, L. P. Pryadko, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional quantum Hall effect in infinite-layer systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5408 (2000).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 126018– Published 15 June, 2026
  • Received 26 January 2026
  • Accepted 8 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation